Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966248062> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 94 of
94
with 100 items per page.
- W1966248062 endingPage "493" @default.
- W1966248062 startingPage "484" @default.
- W1966248062 abstract "Summary 1. Individual variation in the intake rate of foraging animals arises largely from variation in two characteristics: their intrinsic ability to forage in the absence of competitors (foraging efficiency) and the detrimental effect of competitors on their intake rate (susceptibility to interference). We use a model to explore the relative importance of foraging efficiency and dominance, which influences susceptibility to interference, in determining the intake rate of foraging animals at a range of competitor densities. 2. The model is parameterized and tested for a shorebird–prey system, oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus L. feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis L., in which interference occurs because dominant individuals steal prey from subdominant ones. In both oystercatchers which open mussels by stabbing their bill between the shell valves (stabbers) and those which hammer a hole through the shell (hammerers), foraging efficiency is predicted to be the major determinant of intake rate at competitor densities below 100–150 birds ha ‐1 and dominance the major determinant at higher densities. In reality, a very similar relationship is found in stabbers, but in hammerers foraging efficiency remains the most important determinant of intake rate across the full range of observed competitor densities, in contrast to the model's prediction. Oystercatchers typically forage at densities in the range 100–250 birds ha ‐1 , in the region in which foraging efficiency and dominance are of approximately equal importance to stabbers, while foraging efficiency is most important to hammerers. We suggest reasons for the difference in the model's predictive power for stabbers and hammerers. 3. We use the model to make the general predictions that the relative importance of foraging efficiency is higher when (i) it varies more between individuals, (ii) prey encounter rate is high, (iii) handling time is short, (iv) prey stealing (kleptoparasitic) attacks occur over short distances, (v) the probability of stealing prey is low, and (vi) movement speed while foraging is low. In the oystercatcher–mussel system, prey encounter rate is lower and handling time longer than in most other shorebird–prey systems. This suggests that the importance of foraging efficiency in determining intake rate is likely to be greater in many other shorebirds. 4. Most studies of between individual variation in intake rate have focused on the importance of dominance rather than variation in foraging efficiency. Both the model predictions and field data suggest that variation in foraging efficiency may be a more important source of variation in intake rate than its previous depth of study would suggest." @default.
- W1966248062 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1966248062 creator A5045999349 @default.
- W1966248062 creator A5073554842 @default.
- W1966248062 creator A5079897298 @default.
- W1966248062 creator A5081573346 @default.
- W1966248062 date "2000-05-01" @default.
- W1966248062 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
- W1966248062 title "Individual variation in intake rate: the relative importance of foraging efficiency and dominance" @default.
- W1966248062 cites W1983463029 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W1986143737 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2006429184 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2024654250 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2028992442 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2049066751 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2068673760 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2069570798 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2073932436 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2082433676 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2092696058 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2136127709 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2318259615 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2318368363 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2318926633 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2319282646 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2324037622 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2333821723 @default.
- W1966248062 cites W2335740744 @default.
- W1966248062 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00410.x" @default.
- W1966248062 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W1966248062 type Work @default.
- W1966248062 sameAs 1966248062 @default.
- W1966248062 citedByCount "45" @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622012 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622013 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622014 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622015 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622016 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622019 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622020 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622021 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622022 @default.
- W1966248062 countsByYear W19662480622023 @default.
- W1966248062 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1966248062 hasAuthorship W1966248062A5045999349 @default.
- W1966248062 hasAuthorship W1966248062A5073554842 @default.
- W1966248062 hasAuthorship W1966248062A5079897298 @default.
- W1966248062 hasAuthorship W1966248062A5081573346 @default.
- W1966248062 hasBestOaLocation W19662480621 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C151913843 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C165287380 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C2779370140 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C2780614658 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C104317684 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C151913843 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C159985019 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C165287380 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C188382862 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C18903297 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C192562407 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C204323151 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C2779370140 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C2780614658 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C55493867 @default.
- W1966248062 hasConceptScore W1966248062C86803240 @default.
- W1966248062 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W1966248062 hasLocation W19662480621 @default.
- W1966248062 hasOpenAccess W1966248062 @default.
- W1966248062 hasPrimaryLocation W19662480621 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W1966128573 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W1978591541 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W1997339638 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W2003655669 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W2022972740 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W2046044777 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W2062276014 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W2086946011 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W2156877322 @default.
- W1966248062 hasRelatedWork W3207525140 @default.
- W1966248062 hasVolume "69" @default.
- W1966248062 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1966248062 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1966248062 magId "1966248062" @default.
- W1966248062 workType "article" @default.