FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966248753> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966248753 endingPage "41" @default.
• W1966248753 startingPage "37" @default.
• W1966248753 abstract "Most studies of hallux valgus surgery focus on the radiological findings or on medium-term clinical follow-up. The results obtained using various osteotomy techniques do not differ greatly. However, patient comfort and the need for postoperative care do appear to present differences. In the Kramer technique, the osteotomy is secured with a wire extruding from the skin of the foot. In this situation, patients may well experience problems (or at least discomfort) in the immediate postoperative period. Previous studies of the Kramer technique (also known as SERI, or percutaneous distal metatarsal osteotomy) do not report an increased number of complications. Early complications may not influence the outcome in the medium to long term, and patient discomfort during the postoperative period is rarely reflected in the analysis of one-year results obtained with standard scales such as AOFAS; in our experience, however, patient discomfort, the care burden (i.e., the number of visits and emergency service consultations) and the economic cost of immediate postoperative care are all aspects that should be borne in mind when assessing the merits of different surgical techniques. In this study we compare the care burden and economic cost of two surgical approaches to hallux valgus correction – the Kramer and the scarf techniques – during the first postoperative year. Retrospective review of two independent patient cohorts. Sixty-nine feet underwent Kramer osteotomy and 133 the scarf technique. Care burden was assessed by the number of visits each patient required and the complications. The follow-up and costs of each were assessed and compared independently. Both techniques obtain satisfactory clinical results at one year. However, comparison of clinical progression showed AOFAS score increases of 34.7 points for Kramer and 41.1 points for the scarf technique (p-value < 0.05). Patients in the Kramer group required a higher number of visits, especially postoperative emergency department visits (p < 0.05), and had a significantly higher number of complications (27.5% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.05). The mean cost of follow-up was significantly higher in the Kramer group (€ 218.97 vs. € 171.41, p < 0.05). Kramer osteotomy presented significantly higher care burdens, complication rates and associated costs during the first year of follow-up. It is therefore a less cost-effective technique. Thus, even though according to the results of AOFAS we would not have changed our clinical practice, the analysis of these data has made us change our treatment strategy for hallux valgus and practically abandoned the use of the Kramer osteotomies." @default.
• W1966248753 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966248753 creator A5000052075 @default.
• W1966248753 creator A5001192020 @default.
• W1966248753 creator A5004652605 @default.
• W1966248753 creator A5011468616 @default.
• W1966248753 creator A5064156343 @default.
• W1966248753 creator A5082318258 @default.
• W1966248753 date "2015-03-01" @default.
• W1966248753 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1966248753 title "Comparison of postoperative costs of two surgical techniques for hallux valgus (Kramer vs. scarf)" @default.
• W1966248753 cites W138123818 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W1700304324 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W1970952652 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2028122989 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2037505693 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2043379958 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2067300980 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2073875056 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2075867851 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2082342902 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2089295042 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2379408243 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W4246740050 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W4301458939 @default.
• W1966248753 cites W2052875094 @default.
• W1966248753 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2014.09.004" @default.
• W1966248753 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25682405" @default.
• W1966248753 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1966248753 type Work @default.
• W1966248753 sameAs 1966248753 @default.
• W1966248753 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532015 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532016 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532017 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532018 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532019 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532020 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532021 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532022 @default.
• W1966248753 countsByYear W19662487532023 @default.
• W1966248753 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966248753 hasAuthorship W1966248753A5000052075 @default.
• W1966248753 hasAuthorship W1966248753A5001192020 @default.
• W1966248753 hasAuthorship W1966248753A5004652605 @default.
• W1966248753 hasAuthorship W1966248753A5011468616 @default.
• W1966248753 hasAuthorship W1966248753A5064156343 @default.
• W1966248753 hasAuthorship W1966248753A5082318258 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C190892606 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C141071460 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C167135981 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C1862650 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C190892606 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C2776389721 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C2780813298 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C2781017183 @default.
• W1966248753 hasConceptScore W1966248753C71924100 @default.
• W1966248753 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1966248753 hasLocation W19662487531 @default.
• W1966248753 hasLocation W19662487532 @default.
• W1966248753 hasOpenAccess W1966248753 @default.
• W1966248753 hasPrimaryLocation W19662487531 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W1995695297 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2067974056 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2117695196 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2333879843 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2413781052 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2523542174 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2766540937 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W2977919527 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W3032124713 @default.
• W1966248753 hasRelatedWork W3146996116 @default.
• W1966248753 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W1966248753 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1966248753 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1966248753 magId "1966248753" @default.
• W1966248753 workType "article" @default.