FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966264907> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966264907 endingPage "1346" @default.
• W1966264907 startingPage "1340" @default.
• W1966264907 abstract "To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic disc topographic imaging for detection of optic nerve damage in patients suspected of having glaucoma.Observational cohort study.A cohort of 82 patients suspected of having glaucoma based on the appearance of the optic nerve.All patients were imaged using the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter and HRT (software version 3.0) confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. All patients had normal standard automated perimetry visual fields at the time of imaging and were classified based on history of documented stereophotographic evidence of progressive glaucomatous change in the appearance of the optic nerve occurring before the imaging sessions.Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of GDx VCC and the HRT.Forty eyes with progressive glaucomatous optic nerve change were included in the glaucoma group, and 42 eyes without any evidence of progressive damage to the optic nerve followed untreated for an average time of 8.97+/-3.08 years were included in the normal group. The area under the ROC curve for the best parameter from GDx VCC (nerve fiber indicator [NFI]) was significantly larger than that of the best parameter from the HRT (rim volume) (0.83 vs. 0.70; P = 0.044). The NFI parameter also had a larger ROC curve area than that of the contour line-independent parameter glaucoma probability score (0.83 vs. 0.68; P = 0.023). Assuming borderline results as normal, the Moorfields regression analysis classification had a sensitivity of 48% for specificity of 69%. For a similar specificity (70%), the parameter NFI had a significantly larger sensitivity (83%) (P = 0.003).Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with GDx VCC had a superior performance versus topographic optic disc assessment with the HRT for detecting early damage in patients suspected of having glaucoma. For glaucoma diagnosis, these results suggest that GDx VCC may offer advantage over the HRT when these tests are combined with clinical examination of the optic nerve." @default.
• W1966264907 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966264907 creator A5011477510 @default.
• W1966264907 creator A5013649163 @default.
• W1966264907 creator A5043994887 @default.
• W1966264907 creator A5063363976 @default.
• W1966264907 creator A5065784507 @default.
• W1966264907 creator A5075198015 @default.
• W1966264907 date "2008-08-01" @default.
• W1966264907 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1966264907 title "Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Disc Imaging for Diagnosing Glaucoma in Patients Suspected of Having the Disease" @default.
• W1966264907 cites W1896510086 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W1973163265 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W1990724394 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2002526990 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2014022938 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2018868751 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2020220470 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2022187553 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2024440591 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2024842217 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2039303389 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2058173286 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2061483324 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2066861991 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2093439212 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2112827290 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2120019058 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2126692927 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2167326095 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W2328176404 @default.
• W1966264907 cites W4236135856 @default.
• W1966264907 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.008" @default.
• W1966264907 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2832850" @default.
• W1966264907 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18207246" @default.
• W1966264907 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1966264907 type Work @default.
• W1966264907 sameAs 1966264907 @default.
• W1966264907 citedByCount "94" @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072012 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072013 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072014 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072015 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072016 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072017 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072018 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072019 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072020 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072021 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072022 @default.
• W1966264907 countsByYear W19662649072023 @default.
• W1966264907 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966264907 hasAuthorship W1966264907A5011477510 @default.
• W1966264907 hasAuthorship W1966264907A5013649163 @default.
• W1966264907 hasAuthorship W1966264907A5043994887 @default.
• W1966264907 hasAuthorship W1966264907A5063363976 @default.
• W1966264907 hasAuthorship W1966264907A5065784507 @default.
• W1966264907 hasAuthorship W1966264907A5075198015 @default.
• W1966264907 hasBestOaLocation W19662649072 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2776823239 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2779735895 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2780592520 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2780837183 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2781227267 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C2983497740 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C105702510 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C118487528 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C126322002 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2776823239 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2778527774 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2779735895 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2780592520 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2780827179 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2780837183 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2781227267 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C2983497740 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C58471807 @default.
• W1966264907 hasConceptScore W1966264907C71924100 @default.
• W1966264907 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1966264907 hasLocation W19662649071 @default.
• W1966264907 hasLocation W19662649072 @default.
• W1966264907 hasLocation W19662649073 @default.
• W1966264907 hasLocation W19662649074 @default.
• W1966264907 hasOpenAccess W1966264907 @default.
• W1966264907 hasPrimaryLocation W19662649071 @default.
• W1966264907 hasRelatedWork W1503211735 @default.
• W1966264907 hasRelatedWork W1966264907 @default.
• W1966264907 hasRelatedWork W1998399997 @default.
• W1966264907 hasRelatedWork W2002526990 @default.
• W1966264907 hasRelatedWork W2005286832 @default.
• W1966264907 hasRelatedWork W2040049140 @default.

• next