FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966367169> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966367169 endingPage "43.e1" @default.
• W1966367169 startingPage "38" @default.
• W1966367169 abstract "Purpose To compare a new insertion method using an EndoGlide (Angiotech/Network Medical Products) with the standard Busin glide (Moria USA) assisted insertion of the posterior lamellar corneal graft in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Design Prospective, consecutive, comparative, nonrandomized study. Methods Surgery was performed between October 2008 and October 2010 in 52 eyes of 52 consecutive patients with endothelial dysfunction suitable for DSEK. Twenty-two consecutive eyes underwent the new EndoGlide-assisted insertion of donor lenticule and 30 eyes underwent the surgery using the Busin glide. Six-month follow-up data are available for all patients. Clinical details, best-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and corneal endothelial cell loss were assessed at 6 months after DSEK. Results At 6 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity was similar in both groups (0.13 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the EndoGlide eyes as compared with 0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the Busin group; P = .34). Mean spherical equivalent was 0.65 diopter (D) and 0.51 D, and mean refractory cylinder was 1.39 D and 1.08 D, respectively (P = .40). The endothelial cell loss was much lower in the EndoGlide group (25.76%) as compared with the Busin group (47.46%; P < .0001). Conclusions In conclusion, the new EndoGlide results in significantly less endothelial cell loss than Busin glide donor insertion in DSEK. The visual outcomes and refractive changes were similar in both groups. To compare a new insertion method using an EndoGlide (Angiotech/Network Medical Products) with the standard Busin glide (Moria USA) assisted insertion of the posterior lamellar corneal graft in Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Prospective, consecutive, comparative, nonrandomized study. Surgery was performed between October 2008 and October 2010 in 52 eyes of 52 consecutive patients with endothelial dysfunction suitable for DSEK. Twenty-two consecutive eyes underwent the new EndoGlide-assisted insertion of donor lenticule and 30 eyes underwent the surgery using the Busin glide. Six-month follow-up data are available for all patients. Clinical details, best-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and corneal endothelial cell loss were assessed at 6 months after DSEK. At 6 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity was similar in both groups (0.13 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the EndoGlide eyes as compared with 0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the Busin group; P = .34). Mean spherical equivalent was 0.65 diopter (D) and 0.51 D, and mean refractory cylinder was 1.39 D and 1.08 D, respectively (P = .40). The endothelial cell loss was much lower in the EndoGlide group (25.76%) as compared with the Busin group (47.46%; P < .0001). In conclusion, the new EndoGlide results in significantly less endothelial cell loss than Busin glide donor insertion in DSEK. The visual outcomes and refractive changes were similar in both groups." @default.
• W1966367169 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966367169 creator A5020848756 @default.
• W1966367169 creator A5065181814 @default.
• W1966367169 creator A5087924329 @default.
• W1966367169 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1966367169 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1966367169 title "A Prospective Study Comparing EndoGlide and Busin Glide Insertion Techniques in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty" @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1574155093 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1968692064 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1973596492 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1976839074 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1981569689 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1982594013 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1989193461 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1990291427 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W1999091358 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2000452043 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2001764888 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2016362669 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2023680661 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2026297026 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2028813683 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2047827907 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2079290932 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2085875878 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2133585417 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W2152245609 @default.
• W1966367169 cites W62354223 @default.
• W1966367169 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.013" @default.
• W1966367169 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21907966" @default.
• W1966367169 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1966367169 type Work @default.
• W1966367169 sameAs 1966367169 @default.
• W1966367169 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692012 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692013 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692014 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692015 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692016 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692017 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692018 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692019 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692020 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692021 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692022 @default.
• W1966367169 countsByYear W19663671692023 @default.
• W1966367169 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966367169 hasAuthorship W1966367169A5020848756 @default.
• W1966367169 hasAuthorship W1966367169A5065181814 @default.
• W1966367169 hasAuthorship W1966367169A5087924329 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConcept C259533 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConceptScore W1966367169C118487528 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConceptScore W1966367169C141071460 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConceptScore W1966367169C188816634 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConceptScore W1966367169C259533 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConceptScore W1966367169C2778257484 @default.
• W1966367169 hasConceptScore W1966367169C71924100 @default.
• W1966367169 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1966367169 hasLocation W19663671691 @default.
• W1966367169 hasLocation W19663671692 @default.
• W1966367169 hasOpenAccess W1966367169 @default.
• W1966367169 hasPrimaryLocation W19663671691 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W12941325 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W2083248541 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W2108720969 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W2313889000 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W2396091285 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W2577343001 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W3028606979 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W3029119644 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W202679667 @default.
• W1966367169 hasRelatedWork W2612152597 @default.
• W1966367169 hasVolume "153" @default.
• W1966367169 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1966367169 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1966367169 magId "1966367169" @default.
• W1966367169 workType "article" @default.