FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966368397> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966368397 endingPage "173" @default.
• W1966368397 startingPage "163" @default.
• W1966368397 abstract "Abstract. This article, based on a report prepared for the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) and the International Society for Low Vision Research and Rehabilitation (ISLRR), explores the assessment of various aspects of visual functioning as needed to document the outcomes of vision rehabilitation. Documenting patient abilities and functional vision (how the person functions) is distinct from the measurement of visual functions (how the eye functions) and also from the assessment of quality of life. All three areas are important, but their assessment should not be mixed. Observation of task performance offers the most objective measure of functional vision, but it is time‐consuming and not feasible for many tasks. Where possible, timing and error rates provide an easy score. Patient response questionnaires provide an alternative. They may save time and can cover a wider area, but the responses are subjective and proper scoring presents problems. Simple Likert scoring still predominates but Rasch analysis, needed to provide better result scales, is gaining ground. Selection of questions is another problem. If the range of difficulties does not match the range of patient abilities, and if the difficulties are not distributed evenly, the results are not optimal. This may be an argument to use different outcome questions for different conditions. Generic questionnaires are appropriate for the assessment of generic quality of life, but not for specific rehabilitation outcomes. Different questionnaires are also needed for screening, intake and outcomes. Intake questions must be relevant to actual needs to allow prioritization of rehabilitation goals; the activity inventory presents a prototype. Outcome questions should be targeted at predefined rehabilitation goals. The Appendix cites some promising examples. The Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT) is an example of a properly designed randomized control study, and has demonstrated the remarkable effectiveness of vision rehabilitation. It is hoped that further similar studies will follow." @default.
• W1966368397 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966368397 creator A5089842338 @default.
• W1966368397 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W1966368397 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1966368397 title "Assessment of functional vision and its rehabilitation" @default.
• W1966368397 cites W1977483499 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W1986514686 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W1995086395 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W1998865974 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2005672798 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2006529377 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2024568882 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2029751663 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2030499378 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2068039220 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2083050940 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2135848872 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2142887891 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2160509611 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2161217162 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2300351767 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W2473786944 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W3147465372 @default.
• W1966368397 cites W4292806894 @default.
• W1966368397 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01670.x" @default.
• W1966368397 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20039847" @default.
• W1966368397 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1966368397 type Work @default.
• W1966368397 sameAs 1966368397 @default.
• W1966368397 citedByCount "90" @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972012 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972013 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972014 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972015 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972016 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972017 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972018 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972019 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972020 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972021 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972022 @default.
• W1966368397 countsByYear W19663683972023 @default.
• W1966368397 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966368397 hasAuthorship W1966368397A5089842338 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C101266164 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C101266164 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C111472728 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C126322002 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C127413603 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C138496976 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C138885662 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C15744967 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C159110408 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C1862650 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C201995342 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C2778818304 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C2779530757 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C2779951463 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C2780451532 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C41008148 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C71924100 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C75630572 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C98184364 @default.
• W1966368397 hasConceptScore W1966368397C99508421 @default.
• W1966368397 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1966368397 hasLocation W19663683971 @default.
• W1966368397 hasLocation W19663683972 @default.
• W1966368397 hasOpenAccess W1966368397 @default.
• W1966368397 hasPrimaryLocation W19663683971 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W1582205914 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W2015394601 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W2016888119 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W2065401305 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W2156466608 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W2168499478 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W3120506548 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W3132426848 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W4323664158 @default.
• W1966368397 hasRelatedWork W1926427931 @default.

• next