FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966762525> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966762525 endingPage "46" @default.
• W1966762525 startingPage "41" @default.
• W1966762525 abstract "BACKGROUND: Early stage colorectal tumors can be removed by endoscopic mucosal resection but larger such tumors (>20mm) may require piecemeal resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using newly developed endoknives has enabled en-block resection of lesions regardless of size and shape. However ESD for colorectal tumor is technically difficult. Therefore, we performed EMR with small incision (EMR with SI) for more reliable EMR, ESD with snaring (simplified ESD) and ESD using thestandard Flush knife and the novel ball tipped Flush knife (Flush knife BT) for easier and safer colorectal ESD. AIMS: The aims of our study were 1) to compare the treatment results of the following 3 methods (EMR with SI/simplified ESD/ ESD) for early stage colorectal tumors, and 2) to assess the performance of Flush knife BT in colorectal ESD. METHODS: We treated 24/44/468 colorectal tumors and examined the clinicopathological features and treatment results such as tumor size, resected specimen size, procedure time, en-bloc resection rate, complication rate. We also treated 58 colorectal tumors (LST-NG:20, LST-G:36, other:2) using standard Flush knife and 80 colorectal tumors (LST-NG:32, LSTG: 44, other:2) using Flush knife BT, and examined the clinicopathological features and treatment results mentioned above and also the procedure speed. RESULT: The median tumor size (mm) (EMR with SI/ simplified EMR/ESD) was 20/17/30 (EMR with SI vs. simplified ESD:p=n.s, simplified ESD vs. ESD:p< 0.0001). The median resected specimen size (mm) was 22.5/26 /41 (EMR with SI vs. simplified ESD: p=0.0018, simplified ESD vs. ESD: p<0.0001). The procedure time (min.) was 19/27/60 (EMR with SI vs. simplified ESD: p=n.s, simplified ESD vs. ESD: p< 0.0001) The en-block resection rate (%) was 83.3/90.9 /98.9. The complication rate (post-operative bleeding rate/perforation rate) was 0/0, 2.3/4.5, 1.5/1.5 (simplified ESD vs. ESD : p=n.s). In the treatment results of ESD for LSTs by knives, there was no difference between standard Flush knife and Flush knife BT for clinicopathological features and treatment results (procedure time, complication rate and en bloc R0 resection rate). However, procedure speed (cm2/min.) of LST-G was significantly faster in the Flush knife BT than in standard Flush knife. (standard Flush knife: 0.21 vs. Flush knife BT: 0.27, p= 0.034). CONCLUSION: EMR with small incision (EMR with SI) and ESD with snaring (simplified ESD) are good option to fill the gap between EMR and ESD in the colorectum, and also considered to become the nice training for the introduction of ESD. Flush knife BT appears to improve procedure speed compared with standard Flush knife, especially for LST-G in colorectal ESD." @default.
• W1966762525 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5002627702 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5020434543 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5021274281 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5029092593 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5042865102 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5045857753 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5050163685 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5050341064 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5060893642 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5062943543 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5064991646 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5072700467 @default.
• W1966762525 creator A5086844751 @default.
• W1966762525 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W1966762525 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1966762525 title "Endoscopic treatment for early stage colorectal tumors: The comparison between EMR with small incision, simplified ESD, and ESD using the standard Flush knife and the ball tipped Flush knife" @default.
• W1966762525 cites W1964753576 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W1982342920 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W1982429622 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W1998652462 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2010746918 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2021073360 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2023014310 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2026694915 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2043323206 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2074236799 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2087507912 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2129787845 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2131073034 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2144545582 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W2163529942 @default.
• W1966762525 cites W32989530 @default.
• W1966762525 doi "https://doi.org/10.2298/aci1003041t" @default.
• W1966762525 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21066982" @default.
• W1966762525 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1966762525 type Work @default.
• W1966762525 sameAs 1966762525 @default.
• W1966762525 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252012 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252013 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252014 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252015 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252016 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252017 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252019 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252020 @default.
• W1966762525 countsByYear W19667625252021 @default.
• W1966762525 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5002627702 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5020434543 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5021274281 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5029092593 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5042865102 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5045857753 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5050163685 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5050341064 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5060893642 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5062943543 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5064991646 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5072700467 @default.
• W1966762525 hasAuthorship W1966762525A5086844751 @default.
• W1966762525 hasBestOaLocation W19667625251 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C2778866283 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C121608353 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C126322002 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C141071460 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C146357865 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C151730666 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C159110652 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C2777137803 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C2778866283 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C526805850 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C71924100 @default.
• W1966762525 hasConceptScore W1966762525C86803240 @default.
• W1966762525 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1966762525 hasLocation W19667625251 @default.
• W1966762525 hasLocation W19667625252 @default.
• W1966762525 hasOpenAccess W1966762525 @default.
• W1966762525 hasPrimaryLocation W19667625251 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W2045123221 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W2075131855 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W2088888663 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W2115287424 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W2140658376 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W2187977240 @default.
• W1966762525 hasRelatedWork W3171178304 @default.

• next