FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966921310> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966921310 endingPage "334" @default.
• W1966921310 startingPage "328" @default.
• W1966921310 abstract "Purpose: The aim of this study was to illuminate the connotation of “dilemma” regarding the use of physical restraint on elderly patients as represented by female nurses working in general wards at community hospitals who also live with elderly adults at home. Method: The study used the questionnaire method with an independently prepared questionnaire. Participants: The objective of the study was explained to the persons in charge of nursing in the selected 17 hospitals, and 1929. Finally, this study of participants were 524 female nurses working in general 54 wards (excluding the emergency wards of psychiatry, pediatrics, obstetrics, outpatients, operating rooms, and intensive care units) at community hospitals who also live with elderly adults at home. Results and conclusions: Cronbach’s overall coefficient for the 20 items of dilemma was high (0.78) and the factor analysis extracted four dilemma factors as having a characteristic value of 1 (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure value = 0.81) with a cumulative contribution ratio of 64.5%. The high Cronbach’s for these items (0.86, 0.88, 0.87 and 0.81) confirmed the internal consistencies. With respect to the dilemma where nurses working in general wards at community hospitals who also live with elderly adults at home are faced with the physical restraint of elderly persons, four factors in the clarification of the dilemma were extracted: accomplishment of medical-treatment and accident prevention, characteristic features in nursing for elderly patients with dementia, healthcare professional relationship in nursing for elderly patients with dementia, and priorities on the accident prevention for elderly patients with dementia. Therefore, the construction of four systems to cope with these dilemmas is suggested. These systems would enable practising nurses to: (i) institution of policies to encourage discussion between nurses and other medical staff to reach consensus on treatment; (ii) allocating elderly care specialists to wards to promote alternatives to restraints; (iii) establishment of safety standards to define nurses’ responsibilities; and (iv) institution of continuous ethical education for nurses." @default.
• W1966921310 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966921310 creator A5025547247 @default.
• W1966921310 creator A5034570523 @default.
• W1966921310 creator A5079642054 @default.
• W1966921310 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1966921310 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W1966921310 title "Ethical Dilemma Factor in Regarding Physical Restraints to Elderly of Female Nurses with the Living Together Experience" @default.
• W1966921310 cites W1992560272 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2053079057 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2065616910 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2070892634 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2089083300 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2146847088 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2320142121 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2335013131 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2395326715 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2413322702 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W2993731300 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W346174202 @default.
• W1966921310 cites W71661463 @default.
• W1966921310 doi "https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2012.35064" @default.
• W1966921310 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1966921310 type Work @default.
• W1966921310 sameAs 1966921310 @default.
• W1966921310 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1966921310 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966921310 hasAuthorship W1966921310A5025547247 @default.
• W1966921310 hasAuthorship W1966921310A5034570523 @default.
• W1966921310 hasAuthorship W1966921310A5079642054 @default.
• W1966921310 hasBestOaLocation W19669213101 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C2778496695 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C106906290 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C111472728 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C138885662 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C142724271 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C159110408 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C171606756 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C2778496695 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C2779134260 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C2779483572 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C512399662 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C70410870 @default.
• W1966921310 hasConceptScore W1966921310C71924100 @default.
• W1966921310 hasIssue "05" @default.
• W1966921310 hasLocation W19669213101 @default.
• W1966921310 hasOpenAccess W1966921310 @default.
• W1966921310 hasPrimaryLocation W19669213101 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W1990074463 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2011867581 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2031786305 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2044623868 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2139094037 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2407312459 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2414647383 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W2999780792 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W3046083458 @default.
• W1966921310 hasRelatedWork W3135112006 @default.
• W1966921310 hasVolume "03" @default.
• W1966921310 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1966921310 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1966921310 magId "1966921310" @default.
• W1966921310 workType "article" @default.