FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1966946893> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1966946893 endingPage "789" @default.
• W1966946893 startingPage "781" @default.
• W1966946893 abstract "PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the factors—including subject, brain hemisphere, study site, field strength, imaging unit vendor, imaging run, and examination visit—affecting the reproducibility of functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging activations based on a repeated sensory-motor (SM) task. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review boards of all participating sites approved this HIPAA-compliant study. All subjects gave informed consent. Functional MR imaging data were repeatedly acquired from five healthy men aged 20–29 years who performed the same SM task at 10 sites. Five 1.5-T MR imaging units, four 3.0-T units, and one 4.0-T unit were used. The subjects performed bilateral finger tapping on button boxes with a 3-Hz audio cue and a reversing checkerboard. In a block design, 15-second epochs of alternating baseline and tasks yielded 85 acquisitions per run. Functional MR images were acquired with block-design echo-planar or spiral gradient-echo sequences. Brain activation maps standardized in a unit-sphere for the left and right hemispheres of each subject were constructed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, intraclass correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis, and paired Student t tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Significant factors were subject (P < .005), k-space (P < .005), and field strength (P = .02) for sensitivity and subject (P = .03) and k-space (P = .05) for specificity. At 1.5-T MR imaging, mean sensitivities ranged from 7% to 32% and mean specificities were higher than 99%. At 3.0 T, mean sensitivities and specificities ranged from 42% to 85% and from 96% to 99%, respectively. At 4.0 T, mean sensitivities and specificities ranged from 41% to 73% and from 95% to 99%, respectively. Mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (± their standard errors) were 0.77 ± 0.05 at 1.5 T, 0.90 ± 0.09 at 3.0 T, and 0.95 ± 0.02 at 4.0 T, with significant differences between the 1.5- and 3.0-T examinations and between the 1.5- and 4.0-T examinations (P < .01 for both comparisons). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.49 to 0.71. CONCLUSION: MR imaging at 3.0- and 4.0-T yielded higher reproducibility across sites and significantly better results than 1.5-T imaging. The effects of subject, k-space, and field strength on examination reproducibility were significant. © RSNA, 2005" @default.
• W1966946893 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5001556028 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5012263767 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5021319515 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5036726873 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5039914254 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5044035919 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5049632527 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5054913205 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5065328764 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5067281440 @default.
• W1966946893 creator A5081280282 @default.
• W1966946893 date "2005-12-01" @default.
• W1966946893 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1966946893 title "Reproducibility of Functional MR Imaging: Preliminary Results of Prospective Multi-institutional Study Performed by Biomedical Informatics Research Network" @default.
• W1966946893 cites W1968953714 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W1987630053 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W1994343730 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2001990992 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2006115291 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2016133161 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2019252604 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2020776370 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2057314949 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2098724504 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2101096443 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2110437310 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2111167419 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2113319997 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2121663311 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2124537635 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2124606882 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2126052291 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2126369491 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2137834354 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2138328476 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2139376466 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2143001635 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2148347694 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2151721316 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2157825442 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2163274894 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2170437306 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W2322685500 @default.
• W1966946893 cites W4205517823 @default.
• W1966946893 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373041630" @default.
• W1966946893 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1351264" @default.
• W1966946893 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16304101" @default.
• W1966946893 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1966946893 type Work @default.
• W1966946893 sameAs 1966946893 @default.
• W1966946893 citedByCount "87" @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932012 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932013 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932014 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932015 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932016 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932017 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932018 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932019 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932020 @default.
• W1966946893 countsByYear W19669468932022 @default.
• W1966946893 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5001556028 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5012263767 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5021319515 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5036726873 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5039914254 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5044035919 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5049632527 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5054913205 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5065328764 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5067281440 @default.
• W1966946893 hasAuthorship W1966946893A5081280282 @default.
• W1966946893 hasBestOaLocation W19669468932 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C2779226451 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C104709138 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C105795698 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C126322002 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C126838900 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C142724271 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C143409427 @default.
• W1966946893 hasConceptScore W1966946893C171606756 @default.

• next