Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1967233237> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 44 of
44
with 100 items per page.
- W1967233237 endingPage "82" @default.
- W1967233237 startingPage "75" @default.
- W1967233237 abstract "FOR SEVERAL REASONS the rewriting of history is a never-ending process: new evidence is uncovered; fresh interpretations are advanced and defended; changing conditions require new information from the past. But the continuous revision of written history does not permit any and all reinterpretations and rewritings to be equally acceptable. To the unacceptable category must be assigned a new, massive study of American constitutional history, William W. Crosskey's Politics and the Constitution in the History of the United States. Already this iconoclastic work has provoked sufficient informed interest to be enthusiastically reviewed by a federal judge in the Nation, and to be the subject of a symposium in the University of Chicago Law Review. Yet Mr. Crosskey's work, even with its diligent harrowing of the sources, remains a misreading of history rather than a novel and debatable interpretation of the American Constitution. It is not the purpose of this article to disagree with the heartfelt wish for plenary Congressional power which animates Mr. Crosskey's volumes. Rather, the aim here is to show that, regardless of how tempting his end may be, his use of historical evidence is impermissible. Because Mr. Crosskey chose to defend his thesis by close and often involved reasoning, the present refutation of his position must, perforce, follow him over that somewhat forbidding terrain. In a limited space it is impossible to analyze completely his manifold misreading of history, but one of his major points-a reinterpretation of the commerce clause-can be taken as representative of his method, his facts and his claims. It is that major point which we shall analyze in detail here, although other interpretations certainly merit similar examination." @default.
- W1967233237 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1967233237 creator A5034183780 @default.
- W1967233237 date "1954-03-01" @default.
- W1967233237 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1967233237 title "A New Effort To Rewrite the Constitution" @default.
- W1967233237 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/106591295400700106" @default.
- W1967233237 hasPublicationYear "1954" @default.
- W1967233237 type Work @default.
- W1967233237 sameAs 1967233237 @default.
- W1967233237 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1967233237 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1967233237 hasAuthorship W1967233237A5034183780 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConceptScore W1967233237C17744445 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConceptScore W1967233237C199360897 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConceptScore W1967233237C199539241 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConceptScore W1967233237C2776154427 @default.
- W1967233237 hasConceptScore W1967233237C41008148 @default.
- W1967233237 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W1967233237 hasLocation W19672332371 @default.
- W1967233237 hasOpenAccess W1967233237 @default.
- W1967233237 hasPrimaryLocation W19672332371 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W1527862632 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W2109507516 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W2112962394 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W2118300983 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W2135396778 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W2166247150 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W2740990710 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W3137189469 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W4235530921 @default.
- W1967233237 hasRelatedWork W4243252198 @default.
- W1967233237 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W1967233237 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1967233237 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1967233237 magId "1967233237" @default.
- W1967233237 workType "article" @default.