FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1967490618> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1967490618 endingPage "328" @default.
• W1967490618 startingPage "328" @default.
• W1967490618 abstract "For many years, public officials and analysts have been acutely aware of a fundamental interaction between Soviet and U.S. decisions on nuclear forces. The force level, technology, and mix that each side considers adequate for its own security depends on the existing (or anticipated) force level, technology, and mix of its adversary. Various models (see Brubaker, 1972; Brito, 1972; Intriligator, 1975; McGuire, 1965, 1967)-some predating the cold war altogether-have been proposed to deduce the implications of mutual interdependence, so as to understand the nature of this Arms Race process. While numerous theoretical explanations exist, the opportunity for testing out the alternate models is necessarily restricted, in that one must wait for sufficient historical data to accumulate. In view of the fact that 15 years of historical data since the introduction of intercontinental missiles in 1960 are now available in an unclassified form,' certain empirical tests to explore the nature of the arms race and of interaction between the United States and the U.S.S.R. appear feasible and desirable. This paper reports on data collection, model formulation, and preliminary regression analysis into this problem. Since rather more subtle formulations and substantially more exhaustive regression runs are required to produce definitive results, the conclusions reached so far must be qualified as tentative. The first purpose of the study is to analyze the historical data, so as (1) to discern whether an interaction process gave rise to the data; (2) to describe the process in quantitative terms to include the stability of Soviet and American behavior and points of equilibrium in their mutual competition; and (3) in some degree to predict its future course. Because of its inherent intuitive appeal and its correspondence with casually observed force-structure decisions in the U.S. context, there is a strong presumption that some such interaction exists. Therefore, another objective of the study is to compare alternative measures of strategic strength to see which measure yields the best, most intuitively plausible quantitative description of this interaction process, on the prior assumption that such a process exists." @default.
• W1967490618 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1967490618 creator A5011903095 @default.
• W1967490618 date "1977-08-01" @default.
• W1967490618 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1967490618 title "A Quantitative Study of the Strategic Arms Race in the Missile Age" @default.
• W1967490618 cites W1987952222 @default.
• W1967490618 cites W1999186989 @default.
• W1967490618 cites W2076081911 @default.
• W1967490618 cites W2315459739 @default.
• W1967490618 cites W2494936960 @default.
• W1967490618 cites W3123799296 @default.
• W1967490618 cites W632655355 @default.
• W1967490618 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/1925051" @default.
• W1967490618 hasPublicationYear "1977" @default.
• W1967490618 type Work @default.
• W1967490618 sameAs 1967490618 @default.
• W1967490618 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W1967490618 countsByYear W19674906182021 @default.
• W1967490618 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1967490618 hasAuthorship W1967490618A5011903095 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C178802073 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C2778857364 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C2989419327 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConcept C76509639 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C107993555 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C127413603 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C138921699 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C144024400 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C144133560 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C146978453 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C162324750 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C17744445 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C178802073 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C21547014 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C2778857364 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C2989419327 @default.
• W1967490618 hasConceptScore W1967490618C76509639 @default.
• W1967490618 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1967490618 hasLocation W19674906181 @default.
• W1967490618 hasOpenAccess W1967490618 @default.
• W1967490618 hasPrimaryLocation W19674906181 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W1539386280 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W2162905514 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W2316072308 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W2425146126 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W2795478672 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W3121658203 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W4247359544 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W4249606173 @default.
• W1967490618 hasRelatedWork W647120012 @default.
• W1967490618 hasVolume "59" @default.
• W1967490618 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1967490618 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1967490618 magId "1967490618" @default.
• W1967490618 workType "article" @default.