FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1968049137> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1968049137 endingPage "1145" @default.
• W1968049137 startingPage "1145" @default.
• W1968049137 abstract "We thank Dr CS Pramesh and co-authors for their comments which we read with huge interest. Several arguments are given here to respond to their questions. We agree with the fact that a significant percentage of supracarinal lymph nodes are involved in oesophageal cancer, the reason why our educational article suggests a radical transthoracic oesophagectomy, with supracarcinal, but not cervical, lymph node dissection. 1 Mariette C. Piessen G. Oesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38: 210-213 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar With regard to cervical lymphadenectomy, many arguments are given in our article against the systematic use of a three-field lymphadenectomy. Of course those assertions are based on the current literature and we recognize that more evidence is needed. Consequently, the randomised trial promoted by the authors testing the safety and the survival impact of a three-filed lymphadenectomy would be of huge help. As described in our paper, 1 Mariette C. Piessen G. Oesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38: 210-213 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar the literature supports a three-field lymphadenectomy for subgroups of patients in whom the balance between benefits and risks is beneficial. We hope that the authors' trial will help to further identify which patients may benefit from a three-field, rather than a two-field, radical lymphadenectomy. Moreover, we agree that the higher the number of lymph nodes retrieved the better the locoregional control and the survival, 2 Peyre C.G. Hagen J.A. DeMeester S.R. et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 549-556 Crossref PubMed Scopus (172) Google Scholar but this can also be achieved with a radical two-field lymphadenectomy. 3 Mariette C. Piessen G. Briez N. Triboulet J.P. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 365-371 Crossref PubMed Scopus (307) Google Scholar The quality of the lymphadenectomy in the abdominal and the thoracic compartments is probably of greater significance than the absolute number of nodes removed, as demonstrated by the “en bloc” concept. 3 Mariette C. Piessen G. Briez N. Triboulet J.P. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 365-371 Crossref PubMed Scopus (307) Google Scholar In other words, the number of nodes removed is not by itself the absolute paragon, but rather one of several controls of surgical quality. Finally, as reported by the authors, acceptable rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality after three-field lymphadenectomy are achievable in experienced hands but need to be proven in common practice, especially in the obese patients more and more frequently observed in Western countries." @default.
• W1968049137 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1968049137 creator A5000213748 @default.
• W1968049137 creator A5025553705 @default.
• W1968049137 date "2012-11-01" @default.
• W1968049137 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1968049137 title "Response to Dr Pramesh and co-authors" @default.
• W1968049137 cites W2043005121 @default.
• W1968049137 cites W2088976546 @default.
• W1968049137 cites W2093604213 @default.
• W1968049137 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.05.002" @default.
• W1968049137 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1968049137 type Work @default.
• W1968049137 sameAs 1968049137 @default.
• W1968049137 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1968049137 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1968049137 hasAuthorship W1968049137A5000213748 @default.
• W1968049137 hasAuthorship W1968049137A5025553705 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C2776874909 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C2777297899 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C2779742542 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C121608353 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C126322002 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C141071460 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C142724271 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C2775862295 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C2776874909 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C2777297899 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C2779742542 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C2780824555 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C2780849966 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C61434518 @default.
• W1968049137 hasConceptScore W1968049137C71924100 @default.
• W1968049137 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W1968049137 hasLocation W19680491371 @default.
• W1968049137 hasOpenAccess W1968049137 @default.
• W1968049137 hasPrimaryLocation W19680491371 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W1563002699 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W2030407014 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W2039582558 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W2039652252 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W2051277356 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W2275677229 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W262282081 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W3028652714 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W3038842196 @default.
• W1968049137 hasRelatedWork W4366351043 @default.
• W1968049137 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W1968049137 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1968049137 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1968049137 magId "1968049137" @default.
• W1968049137 workType "article" @default.