FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1968049454> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1968049454 endingPage "310" @default.
• W1968049454 startingPage "304" @default.
• W1968049454 abstract "IntroductionThe objectives of this study were to determine the validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) and its associated OrthoCAD software (Cadent) in measuring tooth widths and deriving Bolton ratios.MethodsThirty subjects had impressions taken of their teeth and rendered as stone casts. In addition, their mouths were scanned with the iOC and the scans were converted into digital models. Tooth widths were measured with a digital caliper from the physical models and with the OrthoCAD software from the virtual models. Bolton ratios were derived using the data from each method. Validity was assessed with a paired t test, reliability with the Pearson correlation coefficient, and reproducibility with the intraclass correlation coefficient.ResultsAlthough there were statistically significant differences between mean tooth widths (P = 0.0083) and Bolton ratios (P = 0.0354 and P <0.0001) with the 2 methods, the discrepancies were deemed to be clinically insignificant. The Pearson r for tooth-width replications was 0.99 for both techniques, and all intraclass correlation coefficient values exceeded 87%.ConclusionsThe iOC/OrthoCAD system can be used to measure tooth widths and calculate Bolton ratios with clinically acceptable accuracy and excellent reliability and reproducibility. It appears to be a sound orthodontic aid. The objectives of this study were to determine the validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) and its associated OrthoCAD software (Cadent) in measuring tooth widths and deriving Bolton ratios. Thirty subjects had impressions taken of their teeth and rendered as stone casts. In addition, their mouths were scanned with the iOC and the scans were converted into digital models. Tooth widths were measured with a digital caliper from the physical models and with the OrthoCAD software from the virtual models. Bolton ratios were derived using the data from each method. Validity was assessed with a paired t test, reliability with the Pearson correlation coefficient, and reproducibility with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Although there were statistically significant differences between mean tooth widths (P = 0.0083) and Bolton ratios (P = 0.0354 and P <0.0001) with the 2 methods, the discrepancies were deemed to be clinically insignificant. The Pearson r for tooth-width replications was 0.99 for both techniques, and all intraclass correlation coefficient values exceeded 87%. The iOC/OrthoCAD system can be used to measure tooth widths and calculate Bolton ratios with clinically acceptable accuracy and excellent reliability and reproducibility. It appears to be a sound orthodontic aid." @default.
• W1968049454 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1968049454 creator A5028447901 @default.
• W1968049454 creator A5071187784 @default.
• W1968049454 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W1968049454 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1968049454 title "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: A comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios" @default.
• W1968049454 cites W1994813159 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2017385988 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2018779473 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2050666426 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2061554433 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2066094438 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2083169522 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2087333857 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2091620114 @default.
• W1968049454 cites W2092399153 @default.
• W1968049454 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.011" @default.
• W1968049454 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23910212" @default.
• W1968049454 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1968049454 type Work @default.
• W1968049454 sameAs 1968049454 @default.
• W1968049454 citedByCount "115" @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542013 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542014 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542015 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542016 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542017 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542018 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542019 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542020 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542021 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542022 @default.
• W1968049454 countsByYear W19680494542023 @default.
• W1968049454 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1968049454 hasAuthorship W1968049454A5028447901 @default.
• W1968049454 hasAuthorship W1968049454A5071187784 @default.
• W1968049454 hasBestOaLocation W19680494541 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C186738849 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C2780092901 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C89838059 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C104709138 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C105795698 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C121332964 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C154945302 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C163258240 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C186738849 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C199343813 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C2524010 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C2779751349 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C2780092901 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C29694066 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C33923547 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C41008148 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C43214815 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C62520636 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C71924100 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C89838059 @default.
• W1968049454 hasConceptScore W1968049454C9893847 @default.
• W1968049454 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1968049454 hasLocation W19680494541 @default.
• W1968049454 hasLocation W19680494542 @default.
• W1968049454 hasOpenAccess W1968049454 @default.
• W1968049454 hasPrimaryLocation W19680494541 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W1968049454 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W1975822811 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W2004029572 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W2094109012 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W2117051396 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W2157610036 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W2518012683 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W2990766896 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W3011191706 @default.
• W1968049454 hasRelatedWork W3089194228 @default.
• W1968049454 hasVolume "144" @default.
• W1968049454 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1968049454 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1968049454 magId "1968049454" @default.
• W1968049454 workType "article" @default.