FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1968143388> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1968143388 endingPage "437" @default.
• W1968143388 startingPage "432" @default.
• W1968143388 abstract "The arterial blood gas measurement process is a painful and invasive procedure, often uncomfortable for both the patient and the physician. Because the patient-related factors that determine the difficulty of the process cannot be controlled, the physician-related factors and blood gas measurement techniques are a modifiable area of improvement that ought to be considered. Many hospitals use insulin syringes or syringes washed with heparin for the purpose of blood gas measurement because they do not have blood gas-specific syringes. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare safety-engineered blood gas syringes and conventional heparinized syringes used during the arterial blood gas extraction process in terms of ease of operation, the physician-patient satisfaction, laboratory appropriateness, and complications.Our study included patients whose arterial blood gas needed to be measured in the emergency department and who agreed to participate in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The arterial blood gas of the patients from the first group was measured by using conventional heparinized syringes, whereas safety-engineered blood gas syringes were used to measure the arterial blood gas of the patients from the second group. The groups were compared in terms of demographic data, the number of attempts, the physician and patient satisfaction, early and late-term complications, and laboratory appropriateness of the taken sample.A total of 550 patients were included in our study in a 2-month study period. There were no significant differences between patients in terms of sex, age, weight, height, body mass index, and wrist circumference. In addition, the number of attempts (P=.489), patients' pain level during the procedure (P=.145), and the degree of difficulty of the procedure according to the patient (P=.109) and physician (P=.554) were not significantly different between the groups. After arterial blood gas extraction procedure, 115 patients (20.9%) developed complications. In the conventional heparinized syringe group, the complication rate (n=69; 25.1%) was significantly higher compared with the group that used safety-engineered blood gas syringes (n=46; 16%; P=.0211). Localized pain, which is one of the most common early complications, was more frequent in the conventional heparinized syringe group (19.3%). Complications in women (P=.003) and local pain (P=.01) developed lesser in the second group that used safety-engineered blood gas syringes, and the patient-physician satisfaction was higher in that group, as well. In the evaluation 48 hours after the procedure, the ratios of infection and local hematoma were higher in the conventional heparinized syringe group (P=.0213 and P < .0001).In this study, we did not find any significant differences between the conventional heparinized syringes and safety-engineered blood gas syringes in terms of ease of operation, physician and patient satisfaction, and appropriateness of the taken sample. However, patients whose arterial blood gas was extracted by using safety-engineered blood gas syringes felt less pain and experienced fewer infections and hematomas at their puncture site." @default.
• W1968143388 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1968143388 creator A5046569907 @default.
• W1968143388 creator A5067809398 @default.
• W1968143388 creator A5069268434 @default.
• W1968143388 creator A5091126781 @default.
• W1968143388 date "2014-05-01" @default.
• W1968143388 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1968143388 title "The comparison of heparinized insulin syringes and safety-engineered blood gas syringes used in arterial blood gas sampling in the ED setting (randomized controlled study)" @default.
• W1968143388 cites W1990192683 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2005984730 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2015488045 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2027879155 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2047633336 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2068566778 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2083956818 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2089811762 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2091772130 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2108693332 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2112236146 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2113120654 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2136424493 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W2160516642 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W4213048641 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W4234507524 @default.
• W1968143388 cites W82482778 @default.
• W1968143388 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.020" @default.
• W1968143388 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24560392" @default.
• W1968143388 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1968143388 type Work @default.
• W1968143388 sameAs 1968143388 @default.
• W1968143388 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1968143388 countsByYear W19681433882015 @default.
• W1968143388 countsByYear W19681433882016 @default.
• W1968143388 countsByYear W19681433882017 @default.
• W1968143388 countsByYear W19681433882022 @default.
• W1968143388 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1968143388 hasAuthorship W1968143388A5046569907 @default.
• W1968143388 hasAuthorship W1968143388A5067809398 @default.
• W1968143388 hasAuthorship W1968143388A5069268434 @default.
• W1968143388 hasAuthorship W1968143388A5091126781 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C2778571141 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C2779537118 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C2908947950 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C2988731192 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C3019971873 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C118552586 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C126322002 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C141071460 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C159110408 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C177713679 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C194828623 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C2778571141 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C2779537118 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C2780221984 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C2780724011 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C2908947950 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C2988731192 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C3019971873 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C42219234 @default.
• W1968143388 hasConceptScore W1968143388C71924100 @default.
• W1968143388 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1968143388 hasLocation W19681433881 @default.
• W1968143388 hasLocation W19681433882 @default.
• W1968143388 hasOpenAccess W1968143388 @default.
• W1968143388 hasPrimaryLocation W19681433881 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W151296130 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W2097823875 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W2134188970 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W2379214474 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W2409188043 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W2468849255 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W2883664337 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W3087817847 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W4242930443 @default.
• W1968143388 hasRelatedWork W4367363111 @default.
• W1968143388 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W1968143388 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1968143388 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1968143388 magId "1968143388" @default.
• W1968143388 workType "article" @default.