FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1968302227> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1968302227 endingPage "95" @default.
• W1968302227 startingPage "95" @default.
• W1968302227 abstract "Helping young siblings to get along with one another is one of the most challenging aspects of parenthood. Although the volume of research on sibling relations continues to grow, much of this research does not address patents' real concerns about how to help siblings develop positive relationships (Dunn, 1987; Schachter & Stone, 1987). Furthermore, although many resources are available to help parents reduce conflict and rivalry among their children (e.g., Ames, 1982; Bode, 1991; Faber & Mazlish, 1987; McDermott, 1980; Reit, 1985; Strean & Freeman, 1988; Weiss, 1981), most have not been empirically validated. Additionally, most resources have been developed without the benefit of a systematic assessment of what family members consider to be the most desirable and problematic features of children's sibling relationships. As the effectiveness of an intervention is likely to be enhanced when it is consistent with the needs and desires of the target population, this lack of parental input represents a significant limitation of the applied work to date. Thus, a major objective of the present study was to systematically assess parents' appraisals of the quality of their children's sibling relationships. The absence of a systematic needs assessment has left us with some basic dilemmas about how intervention and prevention programs for sibling relationship problems should be focused. For example, the issue of whether parents are most disturbed by the presence of frequent conflict or the lack of closeness and warmth between their children remains an empirical question. This issue is important because most of the currently available resources emphasize the reduction or elimination of sibling conflict and rivalry, while devoting almost no attention to the facilitation of prosocial sibling relationships (Kramer & Loula, 1992). In fact, the emphasis on the reduction of sibling conflict may be inappropriate given recent empirical evidence that experiences with non-aggressive sibling conflict may actually promote social development. For example, developmental advances in identity formation (Shantz & Hobart, 1989), negotiating and managing conflicts (Hartup, Laursen, Stewart, & Eastenson, 1988; Vandell & Bailey, 1992), and in tolerating negative affect (Katz, Kramer, & Gottman, 1992) have been linked with non-aggressive sibling conflict. Thus, the push to eliminate or greatly reduce all types of sibling conflict may be misguided given the significance of non-destructive conflict for children's social development. In addition, we currently know very little about how parental concerns may change as their children develop. Siblings may face different issues regarding their relationship as they mature, and yet the advice offered in most resources is not tailored to children of particular ages. Recent research suggests that several features of children's sibling relationships do change in accordance with development. For example, Buhrmester and Furman (1990) found that both warmth and conflict among siblings decreased from third to twelfth grade. There are also changes in the characteristics of sibling conflict. Young siblings' conflicts center primarily around objects and possessions, whereas conflicts among adolescents are often multidimensional and have no single cause (Raffaelli, 1992; Vandell & Bailey, 1992). Thus, a second objective of the present study was to systematically describe parents' concerns about their children's sibling relationships with respect to children's developmental levels. This study focused on the early stages of sibling relationship development (i.e., siblings aged 14 months to 8 years). As most of the research on children's sibling relationships has emphasized maternal rather than paternal influences (see Brody, Stoneman, & McCoy, 1992; Brody, Stoneman, McCoy, & Forehand, 1992; Volling & Belsky, in press, for exceptions), very little is known about whether mothers and fathers share similar concerns about their children's sibling relationships. …" @default.
• W1968302227 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1968302227 creator A5038340164 @default.
• W1968302227 creator A5064665596 @default.
• W1968302227 date "1995-01-01" @default.
• W1968302227 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1968302227 title "Parental Perceptions of Children's Sibling Relationships" @default.
• W1968302227 cites W1963783265 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W1977728303 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W1981550386 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W1986936900 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2000505721 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2003110912 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2009975837 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2023205979 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2045763069 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2053764232 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2061255300 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2061356227 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2099256638 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2129935722 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2162174198 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W2483751236 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W3006955415 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W574562514 @default.
• W1968302227 cites W586813619 @default.
• W1968302227 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/584746" @default.
• W1968302227 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W1968302227 type Work @default.
• W1968302227 sameAs 1968302227 @default.
• W1968302227 citedByCount "75" @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272012 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272013 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272014 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272015 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272016 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272017 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272018 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272019 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272020 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272021 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272022 @default.
• W1968302227 countsByYear W19683022272023 @default.
• W1968302227 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1968302227 hasAuthorship W1968302227A5038340164 @default.
• W1968302227 hasAuthorship W1968302227A5064665596 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConcept C2776120587 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConcept C2776194465 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConceptScore W1968302227C138496976 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConceptScore W1968302227C15744967 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConceptScore W1968302227C169760540 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConceptScore W1968302227C26760741 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConceptScore W1968302227C2776120587 @default.
• W1968302227 hasConceptScore W1968302227C2776194465 @default.
• W1968302227 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1968302227 hasLocation W19683022271 @default.
• W1968302227 hasOpenAccess W1968302227 @default.
• W1968302227 hasPrimaryLocation W19683022271 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W1971245872 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W1983492774 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W2006996753 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W2082995714 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W2104553934 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W2146176112 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W2153514689 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W2896387568 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W4246253394 @default.
• W1968302227 hasRelatedWork W4249827257 @default.
• W1968302227 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W1968302227 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1968302227 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1968302227 magId "1968302227" @default.
• W1968302227 workType "article" @default.