Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1968762493> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 62 of
62
with 100 items per page.
- W1968762493 endingPage "179" @default.
- W1968762493 startingPage "178" @default.
- W1968762493 abstract "Dr. Grover’s very kind and complimentary remarks about the recent review [l] on ATP-sensitive potassium channel openers during ischemia and reperfusion are much appreciated. One point, however, causes Dr. Grover considerable concern-this is the citation of (and by implication a presumed agreement with) the comments in the paper by Richer et al. [2]. This paper was critical of the conclusions of a study [3] by Dr. Grover and colleagues in which the authors compared intravenous versus intracoronary administration of nicorandil versus cromakalim. This reply to Dr. Grover is from the author of the review [ 1 ] and the senior co-author of the contentious paper [2]. Dr. Grover states that “Professor Hearse criticised this study based on the lOO-fold lower dose of nicorandil given into the coronary”. Dr. Grover then goes on to justify the choice of this dose on the basis of the fact that the coronary bed supplies a very small mass of tissue and therefore a much lower absolute dose is required than with intravenous administration. We filly accept this and indeed, neither the review El] nor the Richer article [2] took specific issue with this aspect of Dr. Grover’s protocol design. The criticism that was intended related not to the choice of dose between intravenous and intracoronary studies but to the fact that Grover et al. [3] used a dose of nicorandil that was only 3 times higher than that selected for cromakalim. What Professor Hearse actually stated in his concluding synopsis of the Richer paper was that “they argued that, since nicorandil was ten times less potent than cromakalim, any study designed to compare the two drugs and the two routes of administration should have employed a larger dose of nicorandil.” The choice of intravenous versus intracoronary dose was not actually contested by the author of the review. The point at issue (which has been made on a previous occasion [4] by the co-signatory of this letter) is quite straight forward: namely, that because nicorandil is at least 10 times less potent than" @default.
- W1968762493 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1968762493 creator A5049153704 @default.
- W1968762493 date "1996-01-01" @default.
- W1968762493 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1968762493 title "Reply Mechanisms of action of various ATP-sensitive potassium channel openers" @default.
- W1968762493 cites W2007486538 @default.
- W1968762493 cites W2054207754 @default.
- W1968762493 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6363(96)90071-1" @default.
- W1968762493 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
- W1968762493 type Work @default.
- W1968762493 sameAs 1968762493 @default.
- W1968762493 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1968762493 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1968762493 hasAuthorship W1968762493A5049153704 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C2776309818 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C2779768347 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C517785266 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C83743174 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C12554922 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C126322002 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C134018914 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C178790620 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C185592680 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C2776309818 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C2779768347 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C517785266 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C555293320 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C71924100 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C83743174 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C86803240 @default.
- W1968762493 hasConceptScore W1968762493C98274493 @default.
- W1968762493 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W1968762493 hasLocation W19687624931 @default.
- W1968762493 hasOpenAccess W1968762493 @default.
- W1968762493 hasPrimaryLocation W19687624931 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W1986644095 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2002868219 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2022996845 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2034298434 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2048888553 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2083773502 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2279134014 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2353238170 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2417079282 @default.
- W1968762493 hasRelatedWork W2995767258 @default.
- W1968762493 hasVolume "31" @default.
- W1968762493 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1968762493 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1968762493 magId "1968762493" @default.
- W1968762493 workType "article" @default.