FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1968942015> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1968942015 endingPage "1293" @default.
• W1968942015 startingPage "1288" @default.
• W1968942015 abstract "Repeat carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for recurrent stenosis remains a challenging treatment option associated with high morbidity and mortality. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an attractive alternative management option for these patients. However, data about the effectiveness and safety of CAS in a large number of unselected patients are less known. We evaluated 3,070 patients who underwent CAS enrolled in a German registry from 1996 to 2006 at 31 sites. We compared clinical and angiographic features and inhospital outcomes of patients with and without previous CEA who underwent CAS. Of 3,070 patients in the registry, 223 (7.3%) underwent CAS for restenosis after previous CEA. Median age was similar in patients with and without previous CEA (70 years, interquartile range 64 to 76 vs 71 years, interquartile range 65 to 76). Ipsilateral neurologic symptoms occurred in approximately 1/2 the patients in both groups. Other co-morbid conditions and angiographic or procedural factors did not differ between the 2 groups. Inhospital events including death (0% vs 0.4%), ipsilateral major stroke (1.4% vs 1.5%), death or major ipsilateral stroke (1.4% vs 1.7%), ipsilateral transient ischemic attack (1.9% vs 2.8%), myocardial infarction (0.4% vs 0.1%), and reintervention (0.7% vs 0.4%) were all low and not significantly different between those with and without previous CEA (p >0.05 for all comparisons). In conclusion, our data for a large number of patients who underwent CAS in a recent contemporary community-based practice attests to the low risk of periprocedural events in patients with recurrent stenosis after previous CEA. This low risk along with the less invasive nature of the procedure should make CAS an attractive and perhaps preferred option for the treatment of these patients. Repeat carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for recurrent stenosis remains a challenging treatment option associated with high morbidity and mortality. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an attractive alternative management option for these patients. However, data about the effectiveness and safety of CAS in a large number of unselected patients are less known. We evaluated 3,070 patients who underwent CAS enrolled in a German registry from 1996 to 2006 at 31 sites. We compared clinical and angiographic features and inhospital outcomes of patients with and without previous CEA who underwent CAS. Of 3,070 patients in the registry, 223 (7.3%) underwent CAS for restenosis after previous CEA. Median age was similar in patients with and without previous CEA (70 years, interquartile range 64 to 76 vs 71 years, interquartile range 65 to 76). Ipsilateral neurologic symptoms occurred in approximately 1/2 the patients in both groups. Other co-morbid conditions and angiographic or procedural factors did not differ between the 2 groups. Inhospital events including death (0% vs 0.4%), ipsilateral major stroke (1.4% vs 1.5%), death or major ipsilateral stroke (1.4% vs 1.7%), ipsilateral transient ischemic attack (1.9% vs 2.8%), myocardial infarction (0.4% vs 0.1%), and reintervention (0.7% vs 0.4%) were all low and not significantly different between those with and without previous CEA (p >0.05 for all comparisons). In conclusion, our data for a large number of patients who underwent CAS in a recent contemporary community-based practice attests to the low risk of periprocedural events in patients with recurrent stenosis after previous CEA. This low risk along with the less invasive nature of the procedure should make CAS an attractive and perhaps preferred option for the treatment of these patients." @default.
• W1968942015 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5001991451 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5004481198 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5019137844 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5030292811 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5033538116 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5040186735 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5047948391 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5061869826 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5070106208 @default.
• W1968942015 creator A5085798844 @default.
• W1968942015 date "2007-05-01" @default.
• W1968942015 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1968942015 title "Comparison of Inhospital Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Previous Carotid Endarterectomy Undergoing Carotid Stenting (from the German ALKK CAS Registry)" @default.
• W1968942015 cites W1968013204 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W1974428015 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W1992260881 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W1998003306 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W1998145155 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2023344865 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2032037583 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2035430083 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2038169486 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2043731739 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2047297114 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2061920235 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2076822791 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2080504768 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2095752411 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2115082463 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2120258166 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2126355194 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2132385924 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2132619922 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2169527012 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2315045935 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W2767911074 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W3016015592 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W4205997800 @default.
• W1968942015 cites W86545412 @default.
• W1968942015 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.047" @default.
• W1968942015 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17478159" @default.
• W1968942015 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1968942015 type Work @default.
• W1968942015 sameAs 1968942015 @default.
• W1968942015 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W1968942015 countsByYear W19689420152013 @default.
• W1968942015 countsByYear W19689420152015 @default.
• W1968942015 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5001991451 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5004481198 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5019137844 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5030292811 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5033538116 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5040186735 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5047948391 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5061869826 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5070106208 @default.
• W1968942015 hasAuthorship W1968942015A5085798844 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C2778283817 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C2779169563 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C119060515 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C126322002 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C127413603 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C141071460 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C164705383 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C2778283817 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C2778583881 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C2779169563 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C2780007028 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C2780645631 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C2781068581 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C500558357 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C71924100 @default.
• W1968942015 hasConceptScore W1968942015C78519656 @default.
• W1968942015 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W1968942015 hasLocation W19689420151 @default.
• W1968942015 hasLocation W19689420152 @default.
• W1968942015 hasOpenAccess W1968942015 @default.
• W1968942015 hasPrimaryLocation W19689420151 @default.
• W1968942015 hasRelatedWork W1898305458 @default.
• W1968942015 hasRelatedWork W2160162709 @default.
• W1968942015 hasRelatedWork W2220272582 @default.
• W1968942015 hasRelatedWork W2348573880 @default.
• W1968942015 hasRelatedWork W2375943790 @default.

• next