FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969063021> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1969063021 endingPage "455" @default.
• W1969063021 startingPage "448" @default.
• W1969063021 abstract "Abstract Background: Marginal hard tissue defects present at implants with a rough surface can heal with a high degree of bone fill and osseointegration. The healing of similar defects adjacent to implants with a smooth surface appears to be less predictable. Objective: The aim was to compare bone healing at implants with turned or rough surface topographies placed in self‐contained defects using either a submerged or non‐submerged installation technique. Material and Methods: Six dogs were used. Three months after tooth extraction four experimental sites were prepared for implant installation in both sides of the mandible. The marginal 5 mm of the canal prepared for the implant was widened. Thus, following implant placement a circumferential gap occurred between the bone tissue and the implant surface that was between 1 and 1.25 mm wide. In each side of the mandible two implants with a turned surface and two implants with a rough surface were installed. The implants in the right side were fully submerged, while a non‐submerged technique was applied in the left side. The animals were sacrificed 4 months later, block biopsies of each implant site were dissected and ground as well as paraffin sections were prepared. Results: The marginal defects around rough surface implants exhibited after 4 months of healing substantial bone fill and a high degree of osseointegration following either the submerged or the non‐submerged installation technique. Healing at turned implants was characterized by incomplete bone fill and the presence of a connective tissue zone between the implant and the newly formed bone. The distance between the implant margin (M) and the most coronal level of bone‐to‐implant contact (B) at implants with a rough surface was 0.84±0.37 mm at submerged and 0.90±0.39 mm at non‐submerged sites. The distance M–B at implants with a turned surface was 3.39±0.52 mm at submerged and 3.23±0.68 mm at non‐submerged sites. The differences between the rough and turned implants regarding the length of distance M–B were statistically significant (paired t ‐test). Conclusion: Osseointegration at implants placed in sites with marginal defects is influenced by the surface characteristics of the implant." @default.
• W1969063021 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1969063021 creator A5023369662 @default.
• W1969063021 creator A5034983323 @default.
• W1969063021 creator A5077903031 @default.
• W1969063021 creator A5087060936 @default.
• W1969063021 date "2005-04-13" @default.
• W1969063021 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1969063021 title "Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog" @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1520230219 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1523723016 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1562125623 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1588564868 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1790636930 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1858310198 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1968077970 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1988422073 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1989129526 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W1990746690 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2001132984 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2015320537 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2022384578 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2043407520 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2043621524 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2052873763 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2068454857 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2086648976 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2092025365 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2093906426 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2103711878 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2104644692 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2107986553 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2131275492 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2133068289 @default.
• W1969063021 cites W2143116703 @default.
• W1969063021 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2005.00693.x" @default.
• W1969063021 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15842258" @default.
• W1969063021 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1969063021 type Work @default.
• W1969063021 sameAs 1969063021 @default.
• W1969063021 citedByCount "94" @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212012 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212013 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212014 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212015 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212016 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212017 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212018 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212019 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212020 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212021 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212022 @default.
• W1969063021 countsByYear W19690630212023 @default.
• W1969063021 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1969063021 hasAuthorship W1969063021A5023369662 @default.
• W1969063021 hasAuthorship W1969063021A5034983323 @default.
• W1969063021 hasAuthorship W1969063021A5077903031 @default.
• W1969063021 hasAuthorship W1969063021A5087060936 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C101414908 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C157369684 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C2779767645 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C518705261 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C8337478 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C101414908 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C136229726 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C141071460 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C142724271 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C157369684 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C192562407 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C199343813 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C2779767645 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C2781411149 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C518705261 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C59822182 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C71924100 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C8337478 @default.
• W1969063021 hasConceptScore W1969063021C86803240 @default.
• W1969063021 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1969063021 hasLocation W19690630211 @default.
• W1969063021 hasLocation W19690630212 @default.
• W1969063021 hasOpenAccess W1969063021 @default.
• W1969063021 hasPrimaryLocation W19690630211 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W1914206384 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W2001764992 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W2122914998 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W2176597632 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W2397223004 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W2480464219 @default.
• W1969063021 hasRelatedWork W2519784353 @default.

• next