FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969142015> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1969142015 endingPage "482" @default.
• W1969142015 startingPage "459" @default.
• W1969142015 abstract "Freud’s Psychoanalysis: Interpretation and Property Paul Endo Psychoanalysis, writes Freud (1923), is “an art of interpretation” (239). In his major contributions to the history of psychoanalysis, On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement (1914) and An Autobiographical Study (1925), Freud revisits those defining moments when he first claims a knowledge unavailable to others, a knowledge that allows him to distinguish himself as psychoanalysis. In these critical encounters, property is allocated, identities are shaped, meaning is contested—the proper, in all senses, is distributed. Such scenes of interpretative election double as rites of initiation, passages into maturity that prove (both test and confirm) Freud’s responsibility for psychoanalysis. Claiming responsibility rather than originality, Freud can assert a moral right to psychoanalysis without arguing for genetic ownership. He can advance an alternate origin story less indebted to the essentialist narrative of a decisive break between pre-psychoanalysis and psychoanalysis “proper.” 1 Freud approaches ownership from the outside; he assumes responsibility for psychoanalysis, an assumption (“taking upon oneself”) that identifies him with psychoanalysis and, the one supporting and propping up the other, effectively creates both himself and Psychoanalysis in a single act. His paternity—which has more to do with affiliation than filiation—involves adopting contingent, local, even non-existent properties and, through what amounts to an instituting act, contracting them into service as “psychoanalysis.” In On the History, Freud recalls the silence with which his early researches were greeted by an unresponsive and even hostile scientific community. 2 He is careful to add that this isolation is not without its compensations: in a familiar autobiographical topos, ascetic withdrawal generates mystical conversion. “I learnt to restrain speculative tendencies and to follow the unforgotten advice of my master, Charcot: to look at [End Page 459] the same things again and again until they themselves begin to speak” (Freud 1914, 22). He is liberated from external influences and the politics of professional competition and jealousy. Publications “could be postponed as long as I pleased, since there was no doubtful ‘priority’ to be defended” (Freud 1914, 22). Property and ownership have no place in this Edenic “splendid isolation.” Indeed, according to Ernest Jones (1957), “Freud was never interested in questions of priority, which he found merely boring [. . .]” (100). But Freud’s anxieties about priority have been well-documented. 3 Even in what Michel de Certeau has called the “Freudian Novel,” a kind of hybrid historiography open to the impropriety or “non-topos” of poetry, Freud never completely abandons his pretensions to a proper, authoritative voice. De Certeau (1986) writes: “He needs to assure a surplus of institutional force in the place where it is lacking in his discourse so that it might be supposed to have knowledge” (33). 4 Freud is aware that property is contested and, moreover, that “splendid isolation”—taking oneself and one’s property out of circulation—is tantamount to abrogating one’s rights. Priority must be defended, counter-claims answered, one’s own position advanced and aggressively publicized. Throughout his career Freud is concerned with commemorating originary acts and celebrating discoveries. 5 Despite his epochal decentring of the subject, Freud’s authority depends upon a faith in ownership indebted to a liberal construction of the subject and its property. 6 If for Locke (1980) labor removes raw materials from a nature held in common, converting them into personal property (see 18–30), then for Freud and his hermeneutic economics, possession passes to the speculator able to extricate meaning from the meaningless through the addition of interpretive labour. This production of property is not modelled on self-expression, on the reproduction of the self from within. Instead, the subject claims responsibility by making an ethico-legal commitment to stand behind its property and accept—be fully conscious of—its liabilities. Freud’s faith in informed, responsible agency therefore allows him to acknowledge the alterity of self-formation without sacrificing the proper. [End Page 460] The discovered “fact” may pre-exist Freud, then, but if he arrives upon this information independently and, more important, through the proper kind of work (scientific methodology), he is justified in claiming discovery. Freud (1914) deliberately stunts his reading in order, as Byron would say, to “manage..." @default.
• W1969142015 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1969142015 creator A5070036961 @default.
• W1969142015 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W1969142015 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1969142015 title "Freud's Psychoanalysis: Interpretation and Property" @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1490781083 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1492012388 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1505422347 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1528777903 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1532477936 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1539566813 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1550992701 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1571651207 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1575652050 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1590850396 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1591108228 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1591352577 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1976430373 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W1983296185 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2000007266 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2012515754 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2015756904 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2059292536 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2065480447 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2069366313 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2070488390 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2078182366 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2090903812 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2093836961 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2099950913 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2134547888 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2136432360 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2326327955 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W2416018572 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W3032776661 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W3163055748 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W393783353 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W570915922 @default.
• W1969142015 cites W576872850 @default.
• W1969142015 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.1998.0022" @default.
• W1969142015 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W1969142015 type Work @default.
• W1969142015 sameAs 1969142015 @default.
• W1969142015 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1969142015 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1969142015 hasAuthorship W1969142015A5070036961 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C150104678 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C189950617 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C2775941552 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C2776950860 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C2781115785 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C107038049 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C11012388 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C111472728 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C11171543 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C138885662 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C144024400 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C150104678 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C15744967 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C189950617 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C199033989 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C2775941552 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C2776950860 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C2778355321 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C2780876879 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C2781115785 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C41895202 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C527412718 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C77805123 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C86803240 @default.
• W1969142015 hasConceptScore W1969142015C89423630 @default.
• W1969142015 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1969142015 hasLocation W19691420151 @default.
• W1969142015 hasOpenAccess W1969142015 @default.
• W1969142015 hasPrimaryLocation W19691420151 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W1556497657 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W2028153165 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W2054258938 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W2056874861 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W2068931236 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W2186895729 @default.
• W1969142015 hasRelatedWork W2327325220 @default.

• next