Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969277097> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 items per page.
- W1969277097 endingPage "454" @default.
- W1969277097 startingPage "453" @default.
- W1969277097 abstract "Isokinetic testing is often used to assess strength in various muscle groups. It was determined that a number of protocols have used several different repetition sets to assess peak torque. This study measured peak torque in both males and females when using five different velocities and four different repetition sets. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of using variable repetitions on peak torque production in male and female athletes. METHODS: Fifteen male (mean age=20.2 years, height = 199 cm, weight= 84.85 kg) and fifteen female (mean age= 20.5 years, height = 171.9 cm, weight = 77.15 kg) university athletes with no known knee injuries were tested on a Cybex NORM isokinetic machine performing maximal knee extensions with knee flexions held constant at 300 deg/sec. Each subject was tested five or six times, one or two familiarization and four experimental sessions, at velocities of 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 deg/sec. The variable repetitions of four, six, eight or ten were randomly assigned. A 2 X 4 X 5 repeated measures ANOVA (alpha < 0.05) was used to analyze the data, with gender, repetitions, and velocities as independent variables and peak torque as the dependent variable. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in peak torque in either male or female athletes when using a variable number of repetitions. Interestingly enough, when assessing the means of the males and females, the females were much more consistent in peak torque production at each velocity than their male counterparts, regardless of number of repetitions. Additionally, the males in four of the five velocities produced the greatest peak torque when performing four repetitions. Females tended to produce greater peak torques when they executed eight or ten repetitions. As expected there were significant differences in peak torque based on velocity (F=742.95, p<0.05). Additionally, there were significant differences in peak torque by gender (130.774, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When assessing peak torque it appears that females need more repetitions while males need fewer repetitions. This would seem to be an important consideration in rehabilitation protocols and research investigations." @default.
- W1969277097 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1969277097 creator A5009249623 @default.
- W1969277097 creator A5075172825 @default.
- W1969277097 creator A5083444022 @default.
- W1969277097 date "2009-05-01" @default.
- W1969277097 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1969277097 title "Effect Of Variable Repetitions On Peak Torque In Male And Female Athletes" @default.
- W1969277097 doi "https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000355931.21331.a1" @default.
- W1969277097 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1969277097 type Work @default.
- W1969277097 sameAs 1969277097 @default.
- W1969277097 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1969277097 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1969277097 hasAuthorship W1969277097A5009249623 @default.
- W1969277097 hasAuthorship W1969277097A5075172825 @default.
- W1969277097 hasAuthorship W1969277097A5083444022 @default.
- W1969277097 hasBestOaLocation W19692770971 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C102959455 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C144171764 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C2781054738 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C102959455 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C105795698 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C121332964 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C140793950 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C144171764 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C1862650 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C2781054738 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C33923547 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C71924100 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C86803240 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C97355855 @default.
- W1969277097 hasConceptScore W1969277097C99476002 @default.
- W1969277097 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W1969277097 hasLocation W19692770971 @default.
- W1969277097 hasLocation W19692770972 @default.
- W1969277097 hasOpenAccess W1969277097 @default.
- W1969277097 hasPrimaryLocation W19692770971 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W1537235493 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W1981365936 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W2042351583 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W2099565054 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W2184725358 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W2914077585 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W2967928906 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W2978849696 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W4311786358 @default.
- W1969277097 hasRelatedWork W4318026423 @default.
- W1969277097 hasVolume "41" @default.
- W1969277097 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1969277097 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1969277097 magId "1969277097" @default.
- W1969277097 workType "article" @default.