FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969525814> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1969525814 endingPage "1723" @default.
• W1969525814 startingPage "1712" @default.
• W1969525814 abstract "Background Surgical correction of acetabular dysplasia can postpone or prevent joint degeneration. The specific abnormalities that make up the dysplastic hip are controversial. Questions/purposes (1) What are the relative size, shape, and orientations of the typical nondysplastic hip? (2) How do these variables differ in the developmentally dysplastic hip? (3) Are there version differences between the acetabuli of dysplastic and nondysplastic hips? (4) Are there pairs of variables in which the change in one is always accompanied by a change in the other for both nondysplastic and dysplastic acetabuli? Methods Of 117 consecutive three-dimensional (3-D) CT scans performed for hip dysplasia between March 1988 and October 1995, 48 met criteria of developmentally dysplastic hips by plain radiography. These were retrospectively compared with 55 pelvic 3-D CT scans culled from 81 consecutive scans performed for reasons other than hip dysplasia (ie, hip pain, trauma, infection) that did not affect the hip or pelvic landmarks. The 3-D reconstructions were orientated anatomically for standardization of the measurements to be compared. Representative 3-D volumes of the acetabular space were constructed from which we could measure anatomic positions and dimensional information. One author performed all image orientation and measurements. Results Nondysplastic acetabuli are essentially hemispheric with height equal to width and twice the depth. The dysplastic acetabuli were elongated in females (52.4 ± 6.2 mm for dysplastic versus 46.5 ± 4.6 mm for nondysplastic (mean difference, 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-8.0; p = 0.002) and shallower in both females (18.7 ± 4.9 mm for dysplastic versus 23.6 ± 4.0 mm for nondysplastic; mean difference, 6.5; 95% CI, 4.4-8.5; p < 0.0001) and males (21.1 ± 4.8 mm for dysplastic versus 25.0 ± 4.3 mm for nondysplastic, mean difference, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.6-8.1; p = 0.0002); width was similar to that of nondysplastic hips. Acetabular openings were slightly more vertical than nondysplastic hips in females (5°; 95% CI, 1.9-8.1; p = 0.002) but not in male subjects. The dysplastic acetabuli were smaller in volume (18% in females, p = 0.002, and 19% in males, p = 0.0012) and had less space occupied by the femoral head compared with nondysplastic hips (p < 0.0001 for females, p < 0.0001 for males). Dysplastic hip midacetabulum was 4° more anteverted in females (95% CI, 0.5-6.8; p = 0.022) but not for males (p = 0.538). The upper dysplastic acetabulum was more retroverted in females and males (10.2°; 95% CI, 5.5-15; p < 0.0001, and 7.0°; 95% CI, 0.6-13.4; p = 0.032, respectively). Acetabular volumes in nondysplastic and dysplastic hips were related to acetabular width but not to length. Conclusions Developmentally dysplastic acetabuli are not deficient in merely a single dimension but are globally deficient. The subluxated femoral head lies in the elongated and retroverted superior acetabulum, which becomes progressively shallower as the acetabulum increases in length. Focally deficient anterior or posterior femoral head coverage is uncommon. Current procedures that redirect the acetabulum, no matter how technically successful, cannot fully compensate for the incongruence of a spherical femoral head within a shallow and elongated acetabulum unless corrected at an early age when acetabular remodeling is possible. Early detection and treatment of acetabular dysplasia should be emphasized. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study." @default.
• W1969525814 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1969525814 creator A5017986343 @default.
• W1969525814 creator A5019517745 @default.
• W1969525814 creator A5045484929 @default.
• W1969525814 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W1969525814 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1969525814 title "How Are Dysplastic Hips Different? A Three-dimensional CT Study" @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1534935138 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1862977572 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1867896069 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1935258276 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1969754960 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1970167540 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1972253473 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1974095600 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1974715421 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1976276093 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1976388893 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1988513162 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1992469768 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1993349759 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1993980780 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1997850769 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1998381016 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W1999357121 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2002217932 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2009066913 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2010866944 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2016244556 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2017471828 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2025096620 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2029091983 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2039494065 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2040556528 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W204170666 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2046343982 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2048272864 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2049536885 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2053853027 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2059825217 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2060681645 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2061049586 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2062260506 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2072576514 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2075728950 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2080003986 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2081291060 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2100791674 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2102820040 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2105836393 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2108121065 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2121875590 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2130798365 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2133069599 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2135128675 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2142639711 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2144946292 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2157473207 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2169416263 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2174891063 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2274340083 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2279250369 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2304952010 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2315082524 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2318148767 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2326688106 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2328465066 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2330744607 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2331054259 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2333504022 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2334311969 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2344172246 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2395262326 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2407714934 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2470364374 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2624864994 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2988157061 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W2989069164 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W4233761379 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W4242364918 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W4251567101 @default.
• W1969525814 cites W4292477356 @default.
• W1969525814 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4103-y" @default.
• W1969525814 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4385337" @default.
• W1969525814 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25524428" @default.
• W1969525814 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1969525814 type Work @default.
• W1969525814 sameAs 1969525814 @default.
• W1969525814 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142016 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142017 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142018 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142019 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142020 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142021 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142022 @default.
• W1969525814 countsByYear W19695258142023 @default.

• next