FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969546985> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1969546985 endingPage "e23" @default.
• W1969546985 startingPage "e22" @default.
• W1969546985 abstract "There is a paucity of clinical studies comparing single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction combined with posterolateral corner reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of single- and double-bundle transtibial PCL reconstruction combined with reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteus tendon for posterolateral corner insufficiency. The study population consisted of 42 patients who had undergone PCL reconstruction between March 2002 and July 2006, and for whom a minimum of two years of follow-up data were available. We compared clinical outcomes of two surgical techniques: a single-bundle technique with remnant preservation (23 patients, single-bundle group) or a double-bundle technique (19 patients, double-bundle group), each combined with reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament and popliteus tendon for posterolateral corner insufficiency. There were no difference between the single- and double-bundle groups in the mean side-to-side difference of posterior translation measured with Telos stress radiography (4.2 ± 1.7 vs. 3.9 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.628), and rates greater than 5 mm were 22% in single-bundle group and 21% in double-bundle group. Regarding the posterolateral rotatory laxity, there were no differences between the two groups in the mean side-to-side difference in the dial test. (5.3° ± 2.7° vs. 5.1° ± 2.4° at 30°, p = 0.801; 6.7° ± 2.7° vs. 6.7° ± 2.4° at 90°, p = 0.917), or in varus stress radiography (1.2 ± 1.2 mm vs. 1.3 ± 1.4 mm, p = 0.722). The Lysholm knee scores were 85.7 ± 7.6 in the single-bundle group and 87.7 ± 7.3 in the double-bundle group (p =0.392). There was a trend of no difference between the groups in IKDC knee score (p =0.969). The rates of abnormal and severely abnormal categories in IKDC were 30% in single-bundle group and 26% in double-bundle group. Double-bundle PCL reconstruction combined with posterolateral corner reconstruction does not appear to have advantages over remnant preserving single-bundle PCL reconstruction combined with posterolateral corner reconstruction with respect to the clinical outcomes or posterior knee stability." @default.
• W1969546985 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5001901358 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5009608402 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5038876477 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5053614015 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5054999845 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5062142298 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5069821851 @default.
• W1969546985 creator A5090111476 @default.
• W1969546985 date "2010-06-01" @default.
• W1969546985 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1969546985 title "Anterolateral Transtibial PCL Reconstruction Combined with Reconstruction of Posterolateral Corner Insufficiency: Comparison of Single-bundle vs Double-bundle PCL Reconstruction over a 2-6 Year Period (SS-45)" @default.
• W1969546985 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.04.056" @default.
• W1969546985 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1969546985 type Work @default.
• W1969546985 sameAs 1969546985 @default.
• W1969546985 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1969546985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5001901358 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5009608402 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5038876477 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5053614015 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5054999845 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5062142298 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5069821851 @default.
• W1969546985 hasAuthorship W1969546985A5090111476 @default.
• W1969546985 hasBestOaLocation W19695469851 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C2778134712 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C2779753412 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C2780345532 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C141071460 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C159985019 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C192562407 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C2778134712 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C2778434673 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C2779753412 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C2780345532 @default.
• W1969546985 hasConceptScore W1969546985C71924100 @default.
• W1969546985 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1969546985 hasLocation W19695469851 @default.
• W1969546985 hasOpenAccess W1969546985 @default.
• W1969546985 hasPrimaryLocation W19695469851 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W1980979920 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W2010847084 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W2022945028 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W2046926964 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W2047413182 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W2071609694 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W207162253 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W2336950637 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W3038460975 @default.
• W1969546985 hasRelatedWork W5367195 @default.
• W1969546985 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W1969546985 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1969546985 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1969546985 magId "1969546985" @default.
• W1969546985 workType "article" @default.