FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969972546> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1969972546 endingPage "97" @default.
• W1969972546 startingPage "89" @default.
• W1969972546 abstract "Until the twentieth century, no express prohibition against the use of force existed in international law. However, the legitimacy of armed conflict has been an issue of concern since ancient times. Most significantly, the just war doctrine, which was influenced heavily by the writings of Saint Augustine and Saint Thomas Aquinas, characterized armed conflict in terms of right and wrong, morality and immorality. For Augustine, writing in the fifth century A.D., just wars were those that “avenge[d] injuries, when the nation or city against which warlike action is to be directed has neglected either to punish wrongs committed by its own citizens or to restore what has been unjustly taken by it.”1 850 years later, Aquinas refined this standard by suggesting three criteria with which to assess the use of force. To be just, the use of armed force had to be authorized by the sovereign, be for a just cause (i.e., the other side must have committed a wrong), and the belligerent nation or city had to posses the “right intention,” specifically, “the advancement of good, or the avoidance of evil.”2 Writers from the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries built on the works of Augustine and Aquinas, but continued to address just war in its theological context. By the sixteenth century, however, the classic formulation of the doctrine was under challenge. Typical was Machiavelli’s celebrated pronouncement: “that war is just which is necessary.”3 With the end of the religious wars and advent of the modern nationstate system, marked historically by the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, the just war doctrine fell into desuetude. Positivism, an approach to norms based on the practices of states (including agreements between them), emerged to replace it. Its foundational principle, sovereignty, rejected external, non-consensual limits on a state’s prerogative to select the tools of international intercourse, including war, that it deemed best suited to achieve its national interests. Although positivism acknowledged that states should exhaust peaceful remedies before resorting to force, once that occurred, the right to use force was essentially unlimited. The sole exceptions were cased bound by bilateral treaties in which the parties had agreed not to settle disputes forcibly. By the turn of the twentieth century, the legal milieu began to change. The Hague Conventions for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes of" @default.
• W1969972546 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1969972546 creator A5038443729 @default.
• W1969972546 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W1969972546 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1969972546 title "International Law and the Use of Force: The Jus Ad Bellum" @default.
• W1969972546 cites W144367562 @default.
• W1969972546 cites W1494352049 @default.
• W1969972546 cites W2139709470 @default.
• W1969972546 cites W856686930 @default.
• W1969972546 doi "https://doi.org/10.11610/connections.02.3.10" @default.
• W1969972546 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W1969972546 type Work @default.
• W1969972546 sameAs 1969972546 @default.
• W1969972546 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1969972546 countsByYear W19699725462013 @default.
• W1969972546 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1969972546 hasAuthorship W1969972546A5038443729 @default.
• W1969972546 hasBestOaLocation W19699725461 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConcept C2776729102 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConcept C2779280718 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConcept C2779980412 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConceptScore W1969972546C17744445 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConceptScore W1969972546C199539241 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConceptScore W1969972546C2776729102 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConceptScore W1969972546C2779280718 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConceptScore W1969972546C2779980412 @default.
• W1969972546 hasConceptScore W1969972546C55447825 @default.
• W1969972546 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1969972546 hasLocation W19699725461 @default.
• W1969972546 hasOpenAccess W1969972546 @default.
• W1969972546 hasPrimaryLocation W19699725461 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W1429681057 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W2078047217 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W2079488196 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W2476475114 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W310275886 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W4248061730 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W4309324317 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W4312423179 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W4321197991 @default.
• W1969972546 hasRelatedWork W96096147 @default.
• W1969972546 hasVolume "02" @default.
• W1969972546 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1969972546 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1969972546 magId "1969972546" @default.
• W1969972546 workType "article" @default.