FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1969975931> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1969975931 endingPage "1393" @default.
• W1969975931 startingPage "1393" @default.
• W1969975931 abstract "The author of this letter is correct in stating that our paper is the only prospective study. It also includes validated outcome measures relevant to the condition. The reason for embarking upon the study was to attempt to dispel some of the myths that have evolved and become established in surgical and medico-legal thinking. These have been based upon experiential evidence and narrative reviews that are sometimes represented as a meta-analysis. Quality systematic meta-analysis can really occur only with level one or occasionally with good level two evidence. The reviews by Ahn and Todd contain level three and level four evidences.The debate regarding timing is particular to those indulging themselves in medical negligence activity. All spinal specialists recognise the need for urgent expeditious management and perceived ‘time thresholds’ for outcome are artificial. Mr Todds’ suggestions of principles are his own views. The concept that once the bladder is paralysed a spinal decompression can be carried out as a routine, is not accepted by this author or supported by any evidence. It is a stance that cannot be in the best interests of patient care.The limited available evidence suggests that age and incontinence at presentation are the main determinants of outcome. However, despite age over 55 and incontinence at presentation half the patients in this group in our study recovered bladder function with surgery. Half did not.Sub group analysis is not valid with such small numbers, if it was, we would have undertaken it.The partitioning of an analogue spectrum of a disorder into ‘digital’ compartments of convenience displays a lack of practical wisdom and common sense. In our study, we found both clinicians and patients were unable to be precise about the moment of transition from incomplete cauda equine syndrome to cauda equine syndrome with neurogenic retention of urine. Verifiable logic suggests that from an empty bladder to a full bladder with a urine production rate of between 40 and 100 mls per hour, could result in a significant variance of timing. Factors relating to neurogenic retention of urine are multiple. The precise definition of its onset is elusive.Mr Todd would be welcome to repeat our study, perhaps obtaining larger numbers.Yours sincerely,Mr Philip Sell" @default.
• W1969975931 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1969975931 creator A5041918834 @default.
• W1969975931 date "2009-05-29" @default.
• W1969975931 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1969975931 title "Reply to the letter to the editor of N. V. Todd concerning “Cauda Equina Syndrome treated by surgical decompression: the influence of timing on surgical outcome” by A. Qureshi, P. Sell (2007) Eur Spine J 16:2143–2151" @default.
• W1969975931 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1040-7" @default.
• W1969975931 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2899530" @default.
• W1969975931 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1969975931 type Work @default.
• W1969975931 sameAs 1969975931 @default.
• W1969975931 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1969975931 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1969975931 hasAuthorship W1969975931A5041918834 @default.
• W1969975931 hasBestOaLocation W19699759311 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C12770488 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C148220186 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C2780536975 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C3019419658 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C12770488 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C141071460 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C144237770 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C148220186 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C2779480328 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C2780536975 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C3019419658 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C33923547 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C61434518 @default.
• W1969975931 hasConceptScore W1969975931C71924100 @default.
• W1969975931 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W1969975931 hasLocation W19699759311 @default.
• W1969975931 hasLocation W19699759312 @default.
• W1969975931 hasOpenAccess W1969975931 @default.
• W1969975931 hasPrimaryLocation W19699759311 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2035183491 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2042584004 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2051239001 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2076264651 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2185976732 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2358664216 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2364362249 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2463563868 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W2742938313 @default.
• W1969975931 hasRelatedWork W3093674841 @default.
• W1969975931 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W1969975931 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1969975931 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1969975931 magId "1969975931" @default.
• W1969975931 workType "article" @default.