FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1970079524> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1970079524 endingPage "363" @default.
• W1970079524 startingPage "357" @default.
• W1970079524 abstract "Introduction In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is compared with conventional surgery for the treatment of varicose veins based on incompetence of the small saphenous vein and the saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ). Methods In two Dutch hospitals, 189 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive EVLA (810-nm laser) or ligation of the SPJ. End points were success rate measured with duplex ultrasound (6 weeks post-treatment), perioperative pain, quality of life, duration of surgery, difficulty of surgery, complications, cosmetic results, and number of days to resume work and normal activities. Pain was measured on a visual analog scale (VAS). Quality of life was assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Euro Qol-5D. The follow-up duration in this article is 6 weeks. Results One hundred seventy-five patients have been treated and analyzed. One hundred eighteen patients (67%) underwent EVLA, and 57 patients (33%) underwent ligation of the SPJ. The patient characteristics were similar in both groups. In the surgery group, 21% residual incompetence of the SPJ was seen after 6 weeks, compared with 0.9% in the laser group. Both treatment modalities reduced pain after 6 weeks. One week post-treatment, patients in the EVLA group temporarily experienced more pain compared with the surgery group (31 vs 18 on a VAS from 0 to 100). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to quality of life. Both treatments did show improvement in quality of life. Also with regard to the cosmetics, there were no differences, aside from the fact that patients rated their scar as more beautiful after EVLA. After EVLA, patients could return to work more quickly. The operation time was longer in the surgery group. After 2 weeks, there were significantly more neurological complications in the surgery group: 18 (31%) vs 16 (17%) patients in the EVLA group. Ten percent of patients in the surgery group developed a surgical site infection vs 0% in the EVLA group. Conclusions EVLA provides an excellent alternative to conventional surgery in the treatment of symptomatic varicose veins due to an incompetent small saphenous vein with SPJ. EVLA has a superior immediate success rate, is easier and faster, and has fewer complications." @default.
• W1970079524 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5005768692 @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5009821736 @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5012038306 @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5023843843 @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5035440072 @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5040646043 @default.
• W1970079524 creator A5065976488 @default.
• W1970079524 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W1970079524 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W1970079524 title "Endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery in the treatment of small saphenous vein incompetence" @default.
• W1970079524 cites W1968866389 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W1989215478 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2012338200 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2016650672 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2019477944 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2024602826 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2027307208 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2040982599 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2044145792 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2045833744 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2048651982 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2054816078 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2067867348 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2074641075 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2085509545 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2095838368 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2109133579 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2123446449 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2133672069 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2139852532 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2142152557 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2144126113 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2154425342 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2159731163 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2169576331 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W2740271024 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W4232077500 @default.
• W1970079524 cites W4238325657 @default.
• W1970079524 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.05.005" @default.
• W1970079524 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26992756" @default.
• W1970079524 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1970079524 type Work @default.
• W1970079524 sameAs 1970079524 @default.
• W1970079524 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242015 @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242017 @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242018 @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242019 @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242021 @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242022 @default.
• W1970079524 countsByYear W19700795242023 @default.
• W1970079524 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5005768692 @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5009821736 @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5012038306 @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5023843843 @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5035440072 @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5040646043 @default.
• W1970079524 hasAuthorship W1970079524A5065976488 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C2776829320 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C2777475103 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C2779480337 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C120665830 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C121332964 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C141071460 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C14184104 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C159110408 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C168563851 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C2776829320 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C2777475103 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C2779480337 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C2779951463 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C31174226 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C520434653 @default.
• W1970079524 hasConceptScore W1970079524C71924100 @default.
• W1970079524 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1970079524 hasLocation W19700795241 @default.
• W1970079524 hasLocation W19700795242 @default.
• W1970079524 hasOpenAccess W1970079524 @default.
• W1970079524 hasPrimaryLocation W19700795241 @default.
• W1970079524 hasRelatedWork W2370945871 @default.
• W1970079524 hasRelatedWork W2372299581 @default.
• W1970079524 hasRelatedWork W2382738253 @default.
• W1970079524 hasRelatedWork W2384426257 @default.
• W1970079524 hasRelatedWork W2388803181 @default.
• W1970079524 hasRelatedWork W2393713527 @default.

• next