Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1970278894> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W1970278894 endingPage "164" @default.
- W1970278894 startingPage "164" @default.
- W1970278894 abstract "Birnbaum et al1Birnbaum A. Esses D. Bijur P. et al.Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52: 151-159Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar report in their validation study of the San Francisco Syncope Rule that 26% of patients with serious outcomes were not identified by the rule. They also report that physician judgment without application of the prediction rule resulted in admission of all 61 (100%) subjects who experienced serious outcomes. What we cannot glean from the article is how the clinicians formulated that judgment. This critical but undefined component of decisionmaking receives far less attention than those components that are easily measured and therefore quantifiable. As a specialty we must learn more about how these judgments are formed, what clinical information leads to final disposition decisions in general, and specifically how this applies to syncope. Recently we have seen the implementation of checklists in medicine as a successful means of decreasing central line infections in the intensive care setting. The results have been laudable. The use of checklists in medicine has been compared to the use of checklists by airline pilots.2Groopman J. How Doctors Think. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007Google Scholar These are only comparable to a limited extent. The use of checklists is perfect for ensuring that protocol is followed where safety issues are clearly defined, but during an emergency the judgment of a skilled pilot or physician will often be preferable to a rule. Is it surprising that judgment was better than the San Francisco syncope rule? Probably not. Until we have adequately researched and probed the element of physician judgment, and are able to integrate this data into clinical decision rules, it is best to remember that physician judgment should never be replaced by rules, and rules should be used only as a reference to assist judgment." @default.
- W1970278894 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1970278894 creator A5005054859 @default.
- W1970278894 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W1970278894 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W1970278894 title "Clinical Judgment, Clinical Decision Rules, and Evidence-Based Medicine: Thoughts on “An Observation of Failure to Validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule”" @default.
- W1970278894 cites W2025968703 @default.
- W1970278894 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.08.037" @default.
- W1970278894 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19111205" @default.
- W1970278894 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1970278894 type Work @default.
- W1970278894 sameAs 1970278894 @default.
- W1970278894 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W1970278894 countsByYear W19702788942016 @default.
- W1970278894 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1970278894 hasAuthorship W1970278894A5005054859 @default.
- W1970278894 hasBestOaLocation W19702788941 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C20387591 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C2780703726 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C3020452639 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C118552586 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C164705383 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C177713679 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C19527891 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C20387591 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C2780703726 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C2780724011 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C2908647359 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C2987404301 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C3020452639 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C512399662 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C545542383 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C71924100 @default.
- W1970278894 hasConceptScore W1970278894C99454951 @default.
- W1970278894 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W1970278894 hasLocation W19702788941 @default.
- W1970278894 hasLocation W19702788942 @default.
- W1970278894 hasOpenAccess W1970278894 @default.
- W1970278894 hasPrimaryLocation W19702788941 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W1523295487 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W1995885510 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W2004659180 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W2041653200 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W2042517810 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W2050842371 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W3128299011 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W3135375157 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W2523398179 @default.
- W1970278894 hasRelatedWork W3155085044 @default.
- W1970278894 hasVolume "53" @default.
- W1970278894 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1970278894 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1970278894 magId "1970278894" @default.
- W1970278894 workType "article" @default.