Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1971422310> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W1971422310 endingPage "e15" @default.
- W1971422310 startingPage "e8" @default.
- W1971422310 abstract "Immediate implant is a placement of the implant immediately into fresh extraction socket site after tooth extraction and is considered to be a predictable and acceptable procedure. The present work is designed to evaluate the periodontal condition after immediate implant placement and the success rate of implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration. Twenty adult male patients with an endodontic failure, tooth fracture decayed tooth (hopeless tooth) were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: One group (I) received immediate implants augmented with autogenous bone graft, and the other (group II) received immediate implants augmented with a synthetic bone graft. The results revealed that there was a significant difference between the groups for pocket depth and clinical attachment level. The difference between the groups was statistically highly significant only at 12 months (P < .01). In addition, there was statistically significant difference between the groups at 9 and 12 months (P < .001). Moreover, there was significant decrease of marginal bone loss in group I compared with group II (P < .01). In addition, there was statistically significant difference between the both groups at 9 and 12 months for bone density (P < .001). In conclusion, the immediate dental implant placement with autogenous bone graft showed a significant superiority to synthetic bone graft. In addition, the immediate placement–delayed loaded dental implant remains the procedure of choice for predictable achieving of osseointegration. Immediate implant is a placement of the implant immediately into fresh extraction socket site after tooth extraction and is considered to be a predictable and acceptable procedure. The present work is designed to evaluate the periodontal condition after immediate implant placement and the success rate of implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration. Twenty adult male patients with an endodontic failure, tooth fracture decayed tooth (hopeless tooth) were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: One group (I) received immediate implants augmented with autogenous bone graft, and the other (group II) received immediate implants augmented with a synthetic bone graft. The results revealed that there was a significant difference between the groups for pocket depth and clinical attachment level. The difference between the groups was statistically highly significant only at 12 months (P < .01). In addition, there was statistically significant difference between the groups at 9 and 12 months (P < .001). Moreover, there was significant decrease of marginal bone loss in group I compared with group II (P < .01). In addition, there was statistically significant difference between the both groups at 9 and 12 months for bone density (P < .001). In conclusion, the immediate dental implant placement with autogenous bone graft showed a significant superiority to synthetic bone graft. In addition, the immediate placement–delayed loaded dental implant remains the procedure of choice for predictable achieving of osseointegration." @default.
- W1971422310 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1971422310 creator A5072182497 @default.
- W1971422310 creator A5082580098 @default.
- W1971422310 creator A5088252569 @default.
- W1971422310 date "2008-11-01" @default.
- W1971422310 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W1971422310 title "A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration" @default.
- W1971422310 cites W119428450 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W1963801288 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W1975021236 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W1987667507 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W1998176158 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2009218602 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2009317538 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2018441170 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2021792184 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2039886469 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2056880575 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2071130421 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2071564049 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2072862972 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2088725277 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2090840340 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2113279194 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2113811246 @default.
- W1971422310 cites W2153770395 @default.
- W1971422310 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.015" @default.
- W1971422310 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18805718" @default.
- W1971422310 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W1971422310 type Work @default.
- W1971422310 sameAs 1971422310 @default.
- W1971422310 citedByCount "32" @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102012 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102013 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102014 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102015 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102016 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102017 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102018 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102019 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102020 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102021 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102022 @default.
- W1971422310 countsByYear W19714223102023 @default.
- W1971422310 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1971422310 hasAuthorship W1971422310A5072182497 @default.
- W1971422310 hasAuthorship W1971422310A5082580098 @default.
- W1971422310 hasAuthorship W1971422310A5088252569 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C101414908 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C2780338112 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C101414908 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C126322002 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C141071460 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C199343813 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C2780338112 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C2781411149 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C3018023364 @default.
- W1971422310 hasConceptScore W1971422310C71924100 @default.
- W1971422310 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W1971422310 hasLocation W19714223101 @default.
- W1971422310 hasLocation W19714223102 @default.
- W1971422310 hasOpenAccess W1971422310 @default.
- W1971422310 hasPrimaryLocation W19714223101 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W1695561036 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W1971422310 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W2122846005 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W2347233032 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W2353286404 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W2589424220 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W2908578951 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W3082114139 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W4323310030 @default.
- W1971422310 hasRelatedWork W4366181057 @default.
- W1971422310 hasVolume "106" @default.
- W1971422310 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1971422310 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1971422310 magId "1971422310" @default.
- W1971422310 workType "article" @default.