FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1971497777> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1971497777 startingPage "338" @default.
• W1971497777 abstract "By Ronald A. May, R. Earl Welbaum, Randall I. Marmor and Roger P. Sauer I. PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION BONDS A. Bonds under Federal Laws 1. Procedural Ninety-day notice commenced when rented pilings were returned to subcontractor, not when pilings stopped being used. This Fifth Circuit case represents one more installment in the already lengthy legal history of the Miller Act's requirement that the claimant under a bond give notice within 90 days after furnishing work or materials. A general contractor had agreed to perform construction work on a Veterans Administration hospital in Biloxi, Mississippi. The construction required two cofferdams, and the subcontractor responsible for them entered into a rental agreement with the claimant in this case to provide the necessary pilings. The question arose as to whether the time started running on the notice requirement when the subcontractor returned the pilings or when they were removed from the site. The federal district court in Mississippi held that the time started running when the pilings were removed. On appeal, this decision was reversed, and the Fifth Circuit ruled the 90 days commenced when the pilings were returned to the supplier. The action therefore was timely. J.D. Fields & Co. v. Gottfried Corp. (1) 2. Substantive Subcontractor could recover from contractor and Miller Act surety for either breach of contract or quantum meruit. Maris Equipment Co. v. Morganti Inc. (2) is a federal district court decision from New York. The project was a $103 million federal detention center in Brooklyn. While most of the court's lengthy opinion is devoted to elements of damage, the significant legal issues involve the basis for the lawsuit itself. The subcontractor, who eventually prevailed after a four-week trial, was seeking recovery not only under the Miller Act but also under the theory of quantum meruit. Most of the jury's verdict was rendered under the quantum meruit claim. The district court eventually ordered a remittitur and the parties were able to settle the damage claim. A few weeks later, the court issued another opinion awarding prejudgment interest. (3) Bid bond held non-responsive to federal agency's solicitation where substituted form failed to include bond's penal sum. Bid bond held non-responsive where bid was by joint venture, but bond was issued in name of corporation as principal although joint venture and corporation were same legal entity. It's somewhat unusual, but two cases involving bid bonds were decided by the United States Court of Federal Claims within a few days of each other. In the first case, Interstate Rock Products v. United States, (4) the plaintiff wanted to bid on a road job at Bryce Canyon National Park and notified its bonding agent, who had the interesting name of Budd O. Scow, that it needed a bid bond. The bond was procured in the correct amount and included the appropriate penal sum. The original copy of the bond included some illegible parts, however, apparently caused by facsimile transmission, and Scow was requested to issue another bond. This time the bond was legible, but. inadvertently the penal sum was left blank. When the bids were opened, the plaintiff's low bid was rejected in favor of a bid half a million dollars higher. After an interminable discussion of 19 pages, the court finally concluded that the inadvertent omission of the penal sum invalidated the bid. The other bid bond case involved the construction of a contract with the Army Corp of Engineers for modernization of a school in the District of Columbia. The bid bond named as principal James G. Davis Construction Corp. The bid, however, was made in the name of Davis/HRGM, a joint venture. It seems to have been uncontradicted that the two entities were identical. Nevertheless, the court found the bond non-responsive. …" @default.
• W1971497777 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1971497777 creator A5007524930 @default.
• W1971497777 creator A5019824299 @default.
• W1971497777 creator A5061049626 @default.
• W1971497777 creator A5069735684 @default.
• W1971497777 date "2002-07-01" @default.
• W1971497777 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1971497777 title "Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 2001-Part II" @default.
• W1971497777 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W1971497777 type Work @default.
• W1971497777 sameAs 1971497777 @default.
• W1971497777 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1971497777 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1971497777 hasAuthorship W1971497777A5007524930 @default.
• W1971497777 hasAuthorship W1971497777A5019824299 @default.
• W1971497777 hasAuthorship W1971497777A5061049626 @default.
• W1971497777 hasAuthorship W1971497777A5069735684 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C112951243 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C2777496998 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C2779913896 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C2780765947 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C112951243 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C17744445 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C18903297 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C199539241 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C2777134139 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C2777496998 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C2778449503 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C2779913896 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C2780765947 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C86803240 @default.
• W1971497777 hasConceptScore W1971497777C97460637 @default.
• W1971497777 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1971497777 hasLocation W19714977771 @default.
• W1971497777 hasOpenAccess W1971497777 @default.
• W1971497777 hasPrimaryLocation W19714977771 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W132605850 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W1513389580 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W1531621279 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W1971641682 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W1975672492 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W1998505842 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W2002618616 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W2037142080 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W2057182297 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W2060496329 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W229693298 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W2915712354 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W2915716641 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W300902100 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W348964889 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W40311873 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W584049277 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W794109643 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W82799998 @default.
• W1971497777 hasRelatedWork W312593811 @default.
• W1971497777 hasVolume "69" @default.
• W1971497777 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1971497777 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1971497777 magId "1971497777" @default.
• W1971497777 workType "article" @default.