Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1972502595> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W1972502595 endingPage "442" @default.
- W1972502595 startingPage "435" @default.
- W1972502595 abstract "Aims: Standardised assessment tools for developmental coordination disorder (DCD) do not always seem to agree with each other, which causes problems in making clinical and research decisions. This case study research aims to first determine whether or not three standardised assessment tools converge on diagnostic categories of DCD and, second, examine how useful observational assessment is to understanding the intervention process and the outcomes for selected children who exhibited discrepancies between the standard assessment tools. Methods: Based on the case formulation approach, a 7-week individual intervention program was developed for seven children who had delayed motor development and did not meet the DSM diagnostic exclusion criteria for DCD. The observational assessment of this 7-week, weekly intervention was documented, and a motor performance test and two questionnaires were administered before and after the intervention program. The authors examined the consistency and the discrepancies between the assessment tools regarding diagnostic status by employing methodological triangulation of the observational assessment, the movement test and the questionnaires. Results: The three standardised assessment tools agreed on the DCD categories of four out of the seven children both before and after the intervention. The standardised assessment tools produced discrepant results in the DCD categories of four children. Insights gained from the observational assessment could explain some of the reasons behind the discrepancies. Conclusions: Clinicians and researchers need to recognise discrepancies between different standardised assessment tools, not as errors, but as reflections of multiple aspects of motor development. Critical triangulation serves this purpose. Observational assessment can be useful to reconcile the discrepancy between standardised assessment tools and to make an ultimate clinical judgement for the diagnosis of DCD." @default.
- W1972502595 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1972502595 creator A5070971256 @default.
- W1972502595 creator A5076220099 @default.
- W1972502595 date "2013-09-01" @default.
- W1972502595 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W1972502595 title "Critical triangulation of a movement test, questionnaires, and observational assessment for children with DCD" @default.
- W1972502595 cites W1981453950 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W1986639780 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W1995562037 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2022442280 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2034405579 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2048156133 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2080654684 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2091790416 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2099842563 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2119386671 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2163744687 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W2163993412 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W3123732438 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W4210447690 @default.
- W1972502595 cites W4247665917 @default.
- W1972502595 doi "https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.9.435" @default.
- W1972502595 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W1972502595 type Work @default.
- W1972502595 sameAs 1972502595 @default.
- W1972502595 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W1972502595 countsByYear W19725025952017 @default.
- W1972502595 countsByYear W19725025952019 @default.
- W1972502595 countsByYear W19725025952020 @default.
- W1972502595 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1972502595 hasAuthorship W1972502595A5070971256 @default.
- W1972502595 hasAuthorship W1972502595A5076220099 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C169976356 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C176743888 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C2779106727 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C118552586 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C138496976 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C142724271 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C151730666 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C15744967 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C169976356 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C176743888 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C23131810 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C2777267654 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C2779106727 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C2780665704 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C71924100 @default.
- W1972502595 hasConceptScore W1972502595C86803240 @default.
- W1972502595 hasIssue "9" @default.
- W1972502595 hasLocation W19725025951 @default.
- W1972502595 hasOpenAccess W1972502595 @default.
- W1972502595 hasPrimaryLocation W19725025951 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W1891813875 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W1972502595 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2060597045 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2067033638 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2187310527 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2321394668 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2765980456 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W1972502595 hasRelatedWork W2976382042 @default.
- W1972502595 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W1972502595 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1972502595 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1972502595 magId "1972502595" @default.
- W1972502595 workType "article" @default.