Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1972507959> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1972507959 endingPage "66" @default.
- W1972507959 startingPage "53" @default.
- W1972507959 abstract "Clinical studies indicate that genetic factors play a crucial role in primary osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. In addition, it has been suggested that these two diseases are inversely related. Within a population, one can find two sub-groups: the “bone formers” and the “bone losers”. The changes to the joint surfaces used to assess adult age at death are related to the loss of bone substance and to bone formation (osteophytes). The modification of these indicators with age differs between bone formers and bone losers. Therefore, age-at-death assessment methods should make use of two standards, one for each sub-group. A preliminary study examining the possibility of distinguishing those who lose cortical bone from those who show signs of bony formation was conducted on a series of skeletons from Portugal, dating to the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. Bone loss was evaluated using the cortical index (CI) of the second metacarpal on X-rays. The presence of osteophytes on dry bones was assessed macroscopically. Our study indicates that females’ CI decreases with age, whereas the presence of osteophytes is strongly related to age in both sexes. But we have failed to find the inverse relationship between osteophytes and bone loss. Our study, however, shows that within a population, some individuals are not likely to develop osteophytes. De nombreuses études démontrent que les facteurs génétiques jouent un rôle crucial dans le développement de l’arthrose et de l’ostéoporose et que ces deux maladies sont inversement proportionnelles. En effet, au sein d’une même population, deux groupes se distinguent: les «bone fomers» (ceux qui fabriquent de la substance osseuse) et les «bone losers» (ceux qui ont tendance à la perdre). Or, les modifications des surfaces articulaires utilisées pour estimer l’âge au décès des adultes sont liées à la formation et à la perte de substance osseuse. Par conséquent, ces indicateurs évoluent différemment selon la catégorie à laquelle l’individu appartient. Chaque méthode devrait donc proposer deux standards différents. Pour tester cette hypothèse, une étude préliminaire a été menée sur une série de squelettes portugais (fin du 19ième/début du 20ième siècle). Son objectif est de savoir s’il est possible de distinguer les «bone formers» des «bone losers». La perte osseuse a été évaluée par l’index cortical du second métacarpien sur radiographies. La présence d’ostéophytes a été diagnostiquée sur os sec. La relation inverse entre les ostéophytes et la perte osseuse n’a pas été démontrée. Par conséquent, la tentative de distinguer les «bone losers» et les «bone formers» s’est révélée infructueuse. Toutefois, notre étude indique que certains individus ne développent pas d’ostéophytes." @default.
- W1972507959 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1972507959 creator A5040069922 @default.
- W1972507959 creator A5042855345 @default.
- W1972507959 creator A5080850250 @default.
- W1972507959 creator A5022230317 @default.
- W1972507959 date "2007-03-01" @default.
- W1972507959 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1972507959 title "Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods" @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1514239377 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1522533096 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1591211846 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1896485613 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1938800549 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1967057044 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1967435292 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1971826867 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1990119775 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1992175171 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1992361072 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1993211667 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1994262310 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W1996503039 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2005692528 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2011071818 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2012867547 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2014407818 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2019739615 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2020111132 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2024432332 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2026015575 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2031240987 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2032635917 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2038533435 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2039319793 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2045212597 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2053280226 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2054781684 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2055366284 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2057028221 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2060360841 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2060398686 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2061466829 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2062617447 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2075930384 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2078408977 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2082807648 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2085540027 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2093767882 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2094928686 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2095050790 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2095071958 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2095159730 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2096423639 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2106447563 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2107101733 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2140040805 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2145387222 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2154753721 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2159837021 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2289779820 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2325462033 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2336113528 @default.
- W1972507959 cites W2597986589 @default.
- W1972507959 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2006.08.002" @default.
- W1972507959 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17266956" @default.
- W1972507959 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W1972507959 type Work @default.
- W1972507959 sameAs 1972507959 @default.
- W1972507959 citedByCount "20" @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592013 @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592014 @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592015 @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592016 @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592017 @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592018 @default.
- W1972507959 countsByYear W19725079592022 @default.
- W1972507959 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1972507959 hasAuthorship W1972507959A5022230317 @default.
- W1972507959 hasAuthorship W1972507959A5040069922 @default.
- W1972507959 hasAuthorship W1972507959A5042855345 @default.
- W1972507959 hasAuthorship W1972507959A5080850250 @default.
- W1972507959 hasBestOaLocation W19725079596 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C2781451080 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C3018268312 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConceptScore W1972507959C105702510 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConceptScore W1972507959C126322002 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConceptScore W1972507959C142724271 @default.
- W1972507959 hasConceptScore W1972507959C204787440 @default.