FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1972532335> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1972532335 endingPage "10" @default.
• W1972532335 startingPage "1" @default.
• W1972532335 abstract "It is now more than six months since the beginning of the accident on 11 March 2011 at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan. The Japanese government and local health authorities have started to collect the information necessary to estimate radiation doses received by those living in the area around the plant, drafted plans for the health care of residents, and started to implement some of them. This paper reviews and discusses the studies necessary for risk evaluation of cancer and non-cancer diseases, including those already planned, mainly from the view point of evaluating health risk using epidemiological approaches. In the long run, it is important to establish a cohort with a control group. Even if the cumulative doses are estimated to be so low that it is difficult to evaluate the risk of cancer and non-cancer diseases, it is necessary to conduct such a study to reassure residents. The health care programme of the Fukushima Prefecture government, including health check-ups of residents, will help to assess indirect effects of radiation exposure, including psychological problems. The success of any studies of radiation epidemiology depends on the collection of accurate information on radiation doses received by the study subjects. However, some of the dosimetry surveys were not conducted in a timely manner. (It should be recognised, though, that such a problem might have been inevitable, considering the chaotic condition after the nuclear accident.) Accurate estimation of the radiation dose received by each resident is not only important for scientific risk evaluation but also to inform each resident about his or her potential risk. Otherwise, residents will bear an undue psychological burden from uncertainties regarding their radiation exposure and its health consequences. One of other important tasks in Fukushima is the improvement of the quality of the regional cancer registry in this prefecture. It is also important to start thyroid cancer screening in a year or two since the expected minimum latent period among those exposed in early childhood is about 4 years. Recently, local health authorities decided to start a thyroid screening programme for those aged 18 years or younger. Any scientific efforts in Fukushima, which need to gain the trust of study subjects about the objectivity of research, may suffer from the fact that residents in Fukushima Prefecture have begun to suspect that the Japanese government and local authorities are keeping important information from them. It seems necessary to make more effort to reflect the opinions of residents when planning health care programmes and to gain the understanding of the public for the programme. In summary, there are many problems that make the evaluation of cancer and non-cancer disease risk in Fukushima difficult. The help of international colleagues will be invaluable for overcoming those problems. In this paper, these efforts are briefly summarised and some comments are made." @default.
• W1972532335 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1972532335 creator A5062453760 @default.
• W1972532335 date "2012-02-10" @default.
• W1972532335 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1972532335 title "Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture—a preliminary review of current plans" @default.
• W1972532335 cites W1968954104 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W1983729531 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W1985912623 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2039980135 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2044909118 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2052097990 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2072368383 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2074910163 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2134258634 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2149678754 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2178703797 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2314452590 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W2979037148 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W3202663589 @default.
• W1972532335 cites W4234375295 @default.
• W1972532335 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/1" @default.
• W1972532335 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22327057" @default.
• W1972532335 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1972532335 type Work @default.
• W1972532335 sameAs 1972532335 @default.
• W1972532335 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352012 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352013 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352014 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352015 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352016 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352017 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352019 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352020 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352021 @default.
• W1972532335 countsByYear W19725323352022 @default.
• W1972532335 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1972532335 hasAuthorship W1972532335A5062453760 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C107130276 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C2779979336 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C2909705833 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C513653683 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C107130276 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C121332964 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C138885662 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C142724271 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C185544564 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C18903297 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C2778137410 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C2779979336 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C2909705833 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C41895202 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C513653683 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C545542383 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C71924100 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C86803240 @default.
• W1972532335 hasConceptScore W1972532335C99454951 @default.
• W1972532335 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1972532335 hasLocation W19725323351 @default.
• W1972532335 hasLocation W19725323352 @default.
• W1972532335 hasOpenAccess W1972532335 @default.
• W1972532335 hasPrimaryLocation W19725323351 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W1960127248 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W1964097468 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2088224969 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2159059257 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2188002544 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2363746303 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2384146528 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2544010440 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W2946133360 @default.
• W1972532335 hasRelatedWork W3163536085 @default.
• W1972532335 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W1972532335 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1972532335 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1972532335 magId "1972532335" @default.
• W1972532335 workType "article" @default.