FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1972846654> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1972846654 endingPage "1926" @default.
• W1972846654 startingPage "1918" @default.
• W1972846654 abstract "Objective To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature (PCC) measurements made by combined scanning-slit/Placido-disc topography (Orbscan II) after LASIK. Design Experimental instrument validation study. Participants We recruited 22 consecutive postmyopic LASIK patients for the repeatability study and another 50 consecutive postmyopic LASIK patients for the reproducibility study. Methods To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 examiner measured 22 postmyopic LASIK eyes 10 times successively in the shortest time possible. To study intersession reproducibility, the same operator obtained measurements from another 50 eyes with stable refraction in 2 consecutive visits at the same time of the day between 6 and 9 months after myopic LASIK. We explored any association between residual stromal bed thickness and measurement variability. Main Outcome Measures Orbscan II scanning-slit PCC data, precision, within-subject coefficient of variation (CVw), limits of agreement (LoA), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results For intrasession repeatability, precision was 0.067 mm (best-fit sphere [BFS]), 0.110 diopters (D; power within 5 mm), 0.158 D (power within 3 mm), and 0.46 (eccentricity). Repeatability was high for PCC BFS and power measurements within 3-mm and 5-mm zones (CVw ranged from 0.5%–1.2%) but poor for eccentricity data (CVw, 31.6%). Correspondingly, ICCs ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 for PCC BFS and power, and the ICC was 0.20 for PCC eccentricity values. For intersession reproducibility, on average, no difference in PCC measurements could be found, indicating that when there is variability, it is due to random factors. The width of the 95% LoA between sessions was clinically acceptable for BFS (0.25 mm) and power (0.4 D [within 5 mm] and 0.6 D [within 3 mm]). Similarly, ICCs indicated good intersession reliability for BFS and power (0.98, 0.96, and 0.85 for BFS, power within 5 mm, and power within 3 mm, respectively) but poor reliability for eccentricity (0.59). Repeatability and reproducibility were unrelated to stromal bed thickness. Conclusions Orbscan II provides reliable post-LASIK PCC data for symmetrical parameters (BFS and power), independent of the residual stromal bed thickness, but is unreliable for measurements that are radially asymmetrical (eccentricity). Orbscan II is useful for monitoring the PCC after LASIK once the early postoperative period is over. To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature (PCC) measurements made by combined scanning-slit/Placido-disc topography (Orbscan II) after LASIK. Experimental instrument validation study. We recruited 22 consecutive postmyopic LASIK patients for the repeatability study and another 50 consecutive postmyopic LASIK patients for the reproducibility study. To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 examiner measured 22 postmyopic LASIK eyes 10 times successively in the shortest time possible. To study intersession reproducibility, the same operator obtained measurements from another 50 eyes with stable refraction in 2 consecutive visits at the same time of the day between 6 and 9 months after myopic LASIK. We explored any association between residual stromal bed thickness and measurement variability. Orbscan II scanning-slit PCC data, precision, within-subject coefficient of variation (CVw), limits of agreement (LoA), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For intrasession repeatability, precision was 0.067 mm (best-fit sphere [BFS]), 0.110 diopters (D; power within 5 mm), 0.158 D (power within 3 mm), and 0.46 (eccentricity). Repeatability was high for PCC BFS and power measurements within 3-mm and 5-mm zones (CVw ranged from 0.5%–1.2%) but poor for eccentricity data (CVw, 31.6%). Correspondingly, ICCs ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 for PCC BFS and power, and the ICC was 0.20 for PCC eccentricity values. For intersession reproducibility, on average, no difference in PCC measurements could be found, indicating that when there is variability, it is due to random factors. The width of the 95% LoA between sessions was clinically acceptable for BFS (0.25 mm) and power (0.4 D [within 5 mm] and 0.6 D [within 3 mm]). Similarly, ICCs indicated good intersession reliability for BFS and power (0.98, 0.96, and 0.85 for BFS, power within 5 mm, and power within 3 mm, respectively) but poor reliability for eccentricity (0.59). Repeatability and reproducibility were unrelated to stromal bed thickness. Orbscan II provides reliable post-LASIK PCC data for symmetrical parameters (BFS and power), independent of the residual stromal bed thickness, but is unreliable for measurements that are radially asymmetrical (eccentricity). Orbscan II is useful for monitoring the PCC after LASIK once the early postoperative period is over." @default.
• W1972846654 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1972846654 creator A5021361215 @default.
• W1972846654 creator A5037426805 @default.
• W1972846654 creator A5040149451 @default.
• W1972846654 creator A5053719025 @default.
• W1972846654 date "2006-11-01" @default.
• W1972846654 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W1972846654 title "Repeatability and Reproducibility of Posterior Corneal Curvature Measurements by Combined Scanning-Slit and Placido-Disc Topography after LASIK" @default.
• W1972846654 cites W141585252 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1511393708 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1559529406 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1865461679 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1970330875 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1970679844 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1973450404 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1977892984 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1978512146 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1985680571 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1992735824 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W1996806274 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2015301207 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2021414064 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2022662237 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2031895168 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2033417651 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2036947376 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2045908465 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2047817288 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2052772617 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2058905267 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2060388687 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2064320238 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2065273840 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2070337194 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2070835172 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2071949348 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2072395661 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2083717857 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2087762496 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2089159406 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2089777939 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2092250228 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2099269829 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2114581712 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2117917293 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2135569741 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2145599639 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2147454724 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2153708019 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2154068621 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2233404270 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2320153853 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2359895133 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W2478562907 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W4248808158 @default.
• W1972846654 cites W83571168 @default.
• W1972846654 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.053" @default.
• W1972846654 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16935339" @default.
• W1972846654 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1972846654 type Work @default.
• W1972846654 sameAs 1972846654 @default.
• W1972846654 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542012 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542013 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542014 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542015 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542016 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542017 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542021 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542022 @default.
• W1972846654 countsByYear W19728466542023 @default.
• W1972846654 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1972846654 hasAuthorship W1972846654A5021361215 @default.
• W1972846654 hasAuthorship W1972846654A5037426805 @default.
• W1972846654 hasAuthorship W1972846654A5040149451 @default.
• W1972846654 hasAuthorship W1972846654A5053719025 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C154020017 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C190538878 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C259533 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C2776435665 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C2780350528 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C89838059 @default.
• W1972846654 hasConcept C9893847 @default.

• next