Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1973016323> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W1973016323 endingPage "47" @default.
- W1973016323 startingPage "46" @default.
- W1973016323 abstract "The case presented by John Mitchell raises several important legal issues.1 By far the most important in the context of the law on consent to medical treatment is the role of the medical profession in setting the parameters of consent. In the tort of negligence the Bolam test provides that a doctor who conforms with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of professional opinion is not negligent, allowing always for the possibility that there may be more than one responsible body of professional opinion.2 In general terms it is possible to say that it is the profession which effectively sets the standard of competence required by law.The law on consent to treatment should be distinguished, however, from the law of negligence. Any treatment that entails the physical touching of a competent adult patient without consent constitutes the tort of battery. Consent provides a defence which makes the touching lawful. With consent involving a competent adult the simple question from the lawyer's perspective is, did the patient in fact consent to the procedure? It is important to note that the question is not, did a …" @default.
- W1973016323 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1973016323 creator A5036147394 @default.
- W1973016323 date "1995-01-07" @default.
- W1973016323 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W1973016323 title "Commentary: The legal position" @default.
- W1973016323 cites W2079188835 @default.
- W1973016323 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6971.46" @default.
- W1973016323 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2548469" @default.
- W1973016323 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
- W1973016323 type Work @default.
- W1973016323 sameAs 1973016323 @default.
- W1973016323 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W1973016323 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1973016323 hasAuthorship W1973016323A5036147394 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C198082294 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C10138342 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C136764020 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C144133560 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C198082294 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C23123220 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C2522767166 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C41008148 @default.
- W1973016323 hasConceptScore W1973016323C71924100 @default.
- W1973016323 hasIssue "6971" @default.
- W1973016323 hasLocation W19730163231 @default.
- W1973016323 hasOpenAccess W1973016323 @default.
- W1973016323 hasPrimaryLocation W19730163231 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
- W1973016323 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
- W1973016323 hasVolume "310" @default.
- W1973016323 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1973016323 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1973016323 magId "1973016323" @default.
- W1973016323 workType "article" @default.