FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1973149399> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1973149399 endingPage "218" @default.
• W1973149399 startingPage "215" @default.
• W1973149399 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Jan 2012Nomogram to Preoperatively Predict the Probability of Requiring Epididymovasostomy During Vasectomy Reversal David M. Fenig, Michael W. Kattan, Jesse N. Mills, Maria Gisbert, Changhong Yu, and Larry I. Lipshultz David M. FenigDavid M. Fenig Cheseapeake Urology Associates, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author , Michael W. KattanMichael W. Kattan Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio More articles by this author , Jesse N. MillsJesse N. Mills The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, Colorado Financial interest and/or other relationship with Auxilium and Eli Lilly. More articles by this author , Maria GisbertMaria Gisbert St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas More articles by this author , Changhong YuChanghong Yu Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio More articles by this author , and Larry I. LipshultzLarry I. Lipshultz Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas Financial interest and/or other relationship with Allergan, Auxilium, AMS, Pfizer and Repros Therapeutics. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.026AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Up to 6% of men who undergo vasectomy may later undergo vasectomy reversal. Most men require vasovasostomy but a smaller subset requires epididymovasostomy. Outcomes of epididymovasostomy depend highly on specialized training in microsurgery and, if predicted preoperatively, might warrant referral to a specialist in this field. We created a nomogram based on preoperative patient characteristics to better predict the need for epididymovasostomy. Materials and Methods: We evaluated patients who underwent primary vasectomy reversal during a 5-year period. Preoperative and intraoperative patient data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. We evaluated the ability of age, years since vasectomy, vasectomy site, epididymal fullness and granuloma presence or absence to preoperatively predict the need for epididymovasostomy in a given patient. The step-down method was used to create a parsimonious model, on which a nomogram was created and assessed for predictive accuracy. Results: Included in the study were 271 patients with a mean age of 42 years. Patient age was not positively associated with epididymovasostomy. Mean time from vasectomy to reversal was 9.7 years. Time to reversal and a sperm granuloma were selected as important predictors of epididymovasostomy in the final parsimonious model. The nomogram achieved a bias corrected concordance index of 0.74 and it was well calibrated. Conclusions: Epididymovasostomy can be preoperatively predicted based on years since vasectomy and a granuloma on physical examination. Urologists can use this nomogram to better inform patients of the potential need for epididymovasostomy and whether specialist referral is needed. References 1 : Vasectomy in the United States, 2002. J Urol2006; 176: 232. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol1999; 161: 1835. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Vasectomy reversal. Comp Ther1993; 19: 37. Google Scholar 4 : Should all urologists performing vasectomy reversals be able to perform vasoepididymostomies if required?. J Urol2004; 172: 1048. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Practice patterns in vasectomy reversal surgery: results of a questionnaire study among practicing urologists. J Urol2004; 171: 311. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med1996; 15: 361. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 7 : Model to predict if a vasoepididymostomy will be required for vasectomy reversal. J Urol2005; 173: 1681. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Vasectomy reversal performed 15 years or more after vasectomy: correlation of pregnancy outcome with partner age and with pregnancy results of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril2002; 77: 516. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 9 : Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol1991; 145: 505. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia. J Androl2003; 24: 22. Google Scholar 11 : Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusceptions vasoepididymostomy. BJU Int2005; 64: 598. Google Scholar 12 : Is microsurgical intussusceptions vasoepididymostomy a suitable option for men with obstructive azoospermia?. Nat Clin Pract Urol2006; 3: 20. Google Scholar 13 : Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men. J Urol2005; 174: 651. Link, Google Scholar 14 : Innovative single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy. Urology2007; 69: 800. Google Scholar 15 : Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal. Inter J Androl2010; 33: 730. Google Scholar 16 : The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol2004; 171: 304. Link, Google Scholar 17 : Microscopic vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril1977; 28: 1191. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 18 : Intraoperative observations during vasovasostomy in 334 patients. J Urol1983; 129: 524. Link, Google Scholar 19 : A 20-year experience with vasovasostomy. J Urol1986; 136: 413. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Prognostic value of intraoperative parameters observed during vasectomy reversal for predicting postoperative vas patency and fertility. World J Urol2009; 27: 781. Google Scholar © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byHayden R and Tanrikut C (2018) Detection and Management of Obstructive AzoospermiaUrology Practice, VOL. 2, NO. 1, (33-37), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015. Volume 187Issue 1January 2012Page: 215-218 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.KeywordsvasovasostomygranulomavasectomynomogramstestisMetricsAuthor Information David M. Fenig Cheseapeake Urology Associates, Baltimore, Maryland More articles by this author Michael W. Kattan Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio More articles by this author Jesse N. Mills The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, Colorado Financial interest and/or other relationship with Auxilium and Eli Lilly. More articles by this author Maria Gisbert St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas More articles by this author Changhong Yu Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio More articles by this author Larry I. Lipshultz Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas Financial interest and/or other relationship with Allergan, Auxilium, AMS, Pfizer and Repros Therapeutics. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W1973149399 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1973149399 creator A5001454707 @default.
• W1973149399 creator A5058833299 @default.
• W1973149399 creator A5069139102 @default.
• W1973149399 creator A5087500960 @default.
• W1973149399 creator A5088913702 @default.
• W1973149399 creator A5089619775 @default.
• W1973149399 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1973149399 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1973149399 title "Nomogram to Preoperatively Predict the Probability of Requiring Epididymovasostomy During Vasectomy Reversal" @default.
• W1973149399 cites W1528406463 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W1968945080 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W1975117313 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2027899976 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2035285738 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2048926566 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2057521852 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2096097248 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2096230174 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2115452531 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2129925362 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2142739870 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2147978885 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2164750779 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2257140768 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2257369435 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2266185260 @default.
• W1973149399 cites W2298412770 @default.
• W1973149399 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.026" @default.
• W1973149399 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22099990" @default.
• W1973149399 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1973149399 type Work @default.
• W1973149399 sameAs 1973149399 @default.
• W1973149399 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992012 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992013 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992014 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992015 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992016 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992017 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992018 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992020 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992021 @default.
• W1973149399 countsByYear W19731493992022 @default.
• W1973149399 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1973149399 hasAuthorship W1973149399A5001454707 @default.
• W1973149399 hasAuthorship W1973149399A5058833299 @default.
• W1973149399 hasAuthorship W1973149399A5069139102 @default.
• W1973149399 hasAuthorship W1973149399A5087500960 @default.
• W1973149399 hasAuthorship W1973149399A5088913702 @default.
• W1973149399 hasAuthorship W1973149399A5089619775 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2776761254 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2778216348 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2779623869 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C34626388 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C126322002 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C126894567 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C141071460 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2776135927 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2776761254 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2778216348 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2779076696 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2779623869 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2908647359 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C2986817661 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C34626388 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C512399662 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C61434518 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C71924100 @default.
• W1973149399 hasConceptScore W1973149399C99454951 @default.
• W1973149399 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1973149399 hasLocation W19731493991 @default.
• W1973149399 hasLocation W19731493992 @default.
• W1973149399 hasOpenAccess W1973149399 @default.
• W1973149399 hasPrimaryLocation W19731493991 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W1495715725 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W1963579990 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W1968913784 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W1973149399 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W2040488293 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W2160714414 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W2164907898 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W2328600973 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W236352026 @default.
• W1973149399 hasRelatedWork W4239386460 @default.
• W1973149399 hasVolume "187" @default.

• next