FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1973166299> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1973166299 abstract "This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of duloxetine versus other oral treatments used after failure of acetaminophen for management of patients with osteoarthritis.A systematic literature review of English language articles was performed in PUBMED, EMBASE, MedLine In-Process, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1985 and March 2013. Randomized controlled trials of duloxetine and all oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids were included if treatment was ≥12 weeks and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) total score was available. Studies were assessed for quality using the assessment tool from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines for single technology appraisal submissions.WOMAC baseline and change from baseline total scores were extracted and standardized. A frequentist meta-analysis, meta-regression, and indirect comparison were performed using the DerSimonian-Laird and Bucher methods. Bayesian analyses with and without adjustment for study-level covariates were performed using noninformative priors.Thirty-two publications reported 34 trials (2 publications each reported 2 trials) that met inclusion criteria. The analyses found all treatments except oxycodone (frequentist) and hydromorphone (frequentist and Bayesian) to be more effective than placebo. Indirect comparisons to duloxetine found no significant differences for most of the compounds. Some analyses showed evidence of a difference with duloxetine for etoricoxib (better), tramadol and oxycodone (worse), but without consistent results between analyses. Forest plots revealed positive trends in overall efficacy improvement with baseline scores. Adjusting for baseline, the probability duloxetine is superior to other treatments ranges between 15% to 100%.Limitations of this study include the low number of studies included in the analyses, the inclusion of only English language publications, and possible ecological fallacy associated with patient level characteristics.This analysis suggests no difference between duloxetine and other post-first line oral treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) in total WOMAC score after approximately 12 weeks of treatment. Significant results for 3 compounds (1 better and 2 worse) were not consistent across performed analyses." @default.
• W1973166299 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5021469947 @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5022073944 @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5041035865 @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5049601071 @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5053768859 @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5077626458 @default.
• W1973166299 creator A5087903595 @default.
• W1973166299 date "2014-03-11" @default.
• W1973166299 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1973166299 title "The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1517555081 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1552860920 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1606934131 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1729003160 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1951588231 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1980913979 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1983104516 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1985247069 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1988145586 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1989188451 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W1993562654 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2003069609 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2003924139 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2005947177 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2014259208 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2016969982 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2019729102 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2020387702 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2021580648 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2023622543 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2030311535 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2032095501 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2034092444 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2035833931 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2045844949 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2048164399 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2055728946 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2055841596 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2055846831 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2057765075 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2061974517 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2066584443 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2076084708 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2083274218 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2083582055 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2083893275 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2089414790 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2092782520 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2098995101 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2099326967 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2103600429 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2103796156 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2106903173 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2107178532 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2107536070 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2110263281 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2113079259 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2117896603 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2118200369 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2126930838 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2130513475 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2133888386 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2134502485 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2138446311 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2140699272 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2144625636 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2145176191 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2155772830 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2156028141 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2158365407 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2160172135 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2162582390 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2164323898 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2164863281 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W2167792025 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W4246373723 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W4248226706 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W4297918764 @default.
• W1973166299 cites W97805483 @default.
• W1973166299 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-76" @default.
• W1973166299 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4007556" @default.
• W1973166299 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24618328" @default.
• W1973166299 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1973166299 type Work @default.
• W1973166299 sameAs 1973166299 @default.
• W1973166299 citedByCount "43" @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992014 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992015 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992016 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992017 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992018 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992019 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992020 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992021 @default.
• W1973166299 countsByYear W19731662992022 @default.
• W1973166299 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1973166299 hasAuthorship W1973166299A5021469947 @default.
• W1973166299 hasAuthorship W1973166299A5022073944 @default.

• next