FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1973259369> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1973259369 endingPage "201" @default.
• W1973259369 startingPage "183" @default.
• W1973259369 abstract "A basic tenet of nitrogen utilization in phytoplankton is that ammoniuln inhibits nitrate uptake. Consequently, it is generally believed that little or no nitrate uptake occurs at ammonium concentrations above ca 1 yM. A thorough review of field studies shows that the reduction of nitrate uptake rate in the presence of ammonium is rarely so severe, and that it is a highly variable phenomenon. To simplify quantification of the interaction between nitrate and ammonium uptake, it is proposed that it be divided into an indirect interaction, preference, and a direct effect, inhibition. In order to determine preference and inhibition it is necessary to measure uptake of each inorganic nitrogen source alone and in the presence of increasing concentrations of the other nitrogen source. Preference for ammonium uptake is manifested primarily in a higher V,,,,, and lower K, for ammonium uptake than for nitrate uptake and is accentuated by low light and low nitrogen availability. However, although ammonium is the preferred nitrogen source for uptake, growth rates on nitrate usually equal or exceed those on ammonium. Inhibition of nitrate uptake by ammonium is much more variable, but when separated from preference is less extreme. I t is also enhanced by low light, but unlike preference, i t is greater when phytoplankton are N sufficient. Species differences are apparent for both preference and inhibition, but there are only enough data for preference to determine how it varies among algal groups. Finally, there are reports of low concentrations of ammonium stimulating nitrate uptake and of nitrate inhibiting ammonium uptake. Such unexpected interactions along with variations in preference and inhibition with species composition and environmental conditions may account for the variability observed in field studies and will not be explainable or predictable until more is known about the underlying biochemical mechanisms. Even though it is not possible at present to model nitrate uptake accurately because of uncertainty about the interaction between ammonluln and nitrate uptake, it is quite evident that the simplistic view that nitrate uptake is reduced to zero if ammonium exceeds 1 1iM would often result in large underestimates of nitrate uptake and new production. INTRODUCTION Itis generally believed that the rateof nitrate uptake by phytoplankton is severely reduced by the presence of ammonium. This effect is referred to either as 'inhibition' of nitrate uptake by ammonium or 'preference' for ammonium, and in its most extreme form it is believed to result in no nitrate uptake above a threshold ammonium concentration of ca 1 PM. Evidence for the negative effect of ammonium on nitrate utilization arises from 3 sources: (1) early laboratory studies of nitrate utilization in freshwater green algae (reviewed in Morris 1974), (2 ) early field studies in marine ecosystems (Table l ) , and (3) theoretical considerations of the relative energy requirements for the utilization of nitrate and ammonium, due to the number of electrons required to reduce nitrate to ammonium (Losado & Guerrero 1979, Syrett 1981). In many of these early studies it was assumed that nitrate uptake (transport into the cell) and reduction were so tightly coupled that uptake of nitrate must be inhibited by ammonium because the enzyme nitrate reductase is strongly inhibited. It is now known that nitrate uptake and reduction are frequently uncoupled during transient conditions in marine phytoplankton (DeManche e t al. 1979, Dortch et al. 1979, Collos 1982) and that nitrogen uptake and assimilation are so complex that it is difficult to explain the interaction between nitrate and ammonium uptake by one simple mechanism. O Inter-Research/Printed in F. R. Germany 017 1-8630/90/0061/0183/$ 03.00 T ab le 1 . E vl cl en ce f or t he n eg at lv e ef fe ct o f a m m o n ~ u ~ n o n n it ra te u p ta k e in t he f ~ e ld . A ll r at lo s ar e th e ra n g e of v al u es o b se rv ed o r ex tr ap o la te d f or 1 1 tM a m m o n iu m , th e pu ta tl ve t hr es ho lc l fo r in h ~ b lt lo n . If n ec es sa ry , d at a w er e re pl ot te d a s a fu nc ti on o f am m o n iu m c o n ce n tr at lo n , a ft er e x tr ac t~ o n fr om t ab le s an d f ~ g u re s In o rl gi na l re fe re n ce . T h e re la ti o n sh ~ p b et w ee n a r at 10 a nc l a n in cr ea se I n th e NM : co nc en tr at io n 1s d e sc r~ b e d b y : N V , no v ar ia ti on ; L , l in ea r d ec re as e; N L , n o n -l in ea r d ec re as e; 1 , u n ab le t o d et er m in e. V r ef er s to e it h er t he s p ec ~ fl c r at e of u p ta k e (h -' ) or r at e of tr an sp or t (y m ol I' h -' ) of a pa rt ic ul ar N c o m p o u n d . A re a C a r~ h h ra n S ea E su bt ro pi ca l P ac ~ fl c 0. 05 -0 .9 4 N V S co tl a S ea -A n ta rc t~ ca 0 .0 1 4 ::7 N V" @default.
• W1973259369 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1973259369 creator A5030950690 @default.
• W1973259369 date "1990-01-01" @default.
• W1973259369 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W1973259369 title "The interaction between ammonium and nitrate uptake in phytoplankton" @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1530561113 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1533134887 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1963934493 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1964834675 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1968639983 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1969354398 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1972440446 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1973703035 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1980957467 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1982427111 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1982539566 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1982872831 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1983121210 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1995036691 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1999320441 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W1999627193 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2002651877 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2008298570 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2013954085 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2015970680 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2017418032 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2025410092 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2028100108 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2036837791 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2038968086 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2043617210 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2045456845 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2048435337 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2049882431 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2053195646 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2056080582 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2073265394 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2073327071 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2073723669 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2078114051 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2093398893 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2095175046 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2097235527 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2115760768 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2116177972 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2117608807 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2118741129 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2122814062 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2132824552 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2133410019 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2139123790 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2146103230 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2162547768 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2169415185 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2273516412 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W2527591550 @default.
• W1973259369 cites W419645865 @default.
• W1973259369 doi "https://doi.org/10.3354/meps061183" @default.
• W1973259369 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W1973259369 type Work @default.
• W1973259369 sameAs 1973259369 @default.
• W1973259369 citedByCount "638" @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692012 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692013 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692014 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692015 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692016 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692017 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692018 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692019 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692020 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692021 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692022 @default.
• W1973259369 countsByYear W19732593692023 @default.
• W1973259369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1973259369 hasAuthorship W1973259369A5030950690 @default.
• W1973259369 hasBestOaLocation W19732593691 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C107872376 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C142796444 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C2776384668 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C2776617377 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C2779870022 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C2780892065 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C107872376 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C111368507 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C127313418 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C142796444 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C178790620 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C185592680 @default.
• W1973259369 hasConceptScore W1973259369C18903297 @default.

• next