FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1973416187> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1973416187 endingPage "956" @default.
• W1973416187 startingPage "949" @default.
• W1973416187 abstract "Statement of problem Different techniques have been suggested for cleaning dentin surfaces after the removal of an interim prosthesis and before the application of a bonding agent. How different surface-cleaning techniques affect the bond strength of the composite resin restorations is not clear. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different surface-cleaning techniques on the bond strength of composite resin restorations and the surface topography of the prepared tooth surfaces. Material and methods The occlusal surfaces of 25 molars were ground until the dentin was exposed. A bonding agent and interim cement were applied on the teeth. The teeth were divided into 5 groups (n=5) according to the method used for surface-cleaning (microairborne-particle abrasion, alcohol, rubber-rotary instrument, desiccating agent, and control). Once the surfaces of the teeth had been cleaned, the same bonding material was applied to the teeth. A 5-mm-thick composite resin layer was built up. Each specimen was sectioned to microbars, and 6 centrally located beams were selected for microtensile testing (n=30) (1.10 ±0.10 mm). The data were statistically analyzed with 1-way ANOVA (1-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). The Bonferroni test was used for significantly different groups (α=.05). One specimen from each group was observed under a scanning electron microscope and an atomic force microscope. Energy dispersive x-ray analysis also was performed. Results Bond strength values were in the following descending order: microairborne-particle abrasion, desiccating agent, alcohol, rubber-rotary instrument, control. Differences between the microairborne-particle abrasion group and the remainder of the groups, desiccating agent--rubber-rotary instrument, desiccating agent-control, alcohol--rubber-rotary instrument, and alcohol-control groups, were statistically significant (P<.05). The microairborne-particle abrasion group displayed the roughest surface and a different surface topography from the remainder of the groups. Increased aluminum was observed in the microairborne-particle abrasion group. Conclusions Surface-cleaning techniques, except for the rubber-rotary instrument, increased the bond strength of composite resin. The roughest dentin surfaces and highest bond strength were achieved with the microairborne-particle abrasion technique. Different techniques have been suggested for cleaning dentin surfaces after the removal of an interim prosthesis and before the application of a bonding agent. How different surface-cleaning techniques affect the bond strength of the composite resin restorations is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different surface-cleaning techniques on the bond strength of composite resin restorations and the surface topography of the prepared tooth surfaces. The occlusal surfaces of 25 molars were ground until the dentin was exposed. A bonding agent and interim cement were applied on the teeth. The teeth were divided into 5 groups (n=5) according to the method used for surface-cleaning (microairborne-particle abrasion, alcohol, rubber-rotary instrument, desiccating agent, and control). Once the surfaces of the teeth had been cleaned, the same bonding material was applied to the teeth. A 5-mm-thick composite resin layer was built up. Each specimen was sectioned to microbars, and 6 centrally located beams were selected for microtensile testing (n=30) (1.10 ±0.10 mm). The data were statistically analyzed with 1-way ANOVA (1-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). The Bonferroni test was used for significantly different groups (α=.05). One specimen from each group was observed under a scanning electron microscope and an atomic force microscope. Energy dispersive x-ray analysis also was performed. Bond strength values were in the following descending order: microairborne-particle abrasion, desiccating agent, alcohol, rubber-rotary instrument, control. Differences between the microairborne-particle abrasion group and the remainder of the groups, desiccating agent--rubber-rotary instrument, desiccating agent-control, alcohol--rubber-rotary instrument, and alcohol-control groups, were statistically significant (P<.05). The microairborne-particle abrasion group displayed the roughest surface and a different surface topography from the remainder of the groups. Increased aluminum was observed in the microairborne-particle abrasion group. Surface-cleaning techniques, except for the rubber-rotary instrument, increased the bond strength of composite resin. The roughest dentin surfaces and highest bond strength were achieved with the microairborne-particle abrasion technique." @default.
• W1973416187 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1973416187 creator A5055465960 @default.
• W1973416187 creator A5061746346 @default.
• W1973416187 creator A5062753017 @default.
• W1973416187 creator A5065011744 @default.
• W1973416187 creator A5078776935 @default.
• W1973416187 creator A5083945896 @default.
• W1973416187 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W1973416187 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W1973416187 title "Effect of different surface-cleaning techniques on the bond strength of composite resin restorations" @default.
• W1973416187 cites W122932297 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W128969355 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W144487667 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W1582071537 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W194918563 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W19649939 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W1966688689 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W1978963459 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W198617406 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W1990296779 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W1998742143 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2000336658 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2011701678 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2019799775 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2021219173 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2022053256 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2037834996 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2039811924 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2042202823 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2058747682 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2068096864 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2072942565 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2075637680 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2077020199 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2085080328 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2095042794 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2107720645 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2128856024 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2152902550 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2233666393 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W2412790980 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W571487888 @default.
• W1973416187 cites W90304462 @default.
• W1973416187 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.001" @default.
• W1973416187 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24939254" @default.
• W1973416187 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1973416187 type Work @default.
• W1973416187 sameAs 1973416187 @default.
• W1973416187 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1973416187 countsByYear W19734161872017 @default.
• W1973416187 countsByYear W19734161872021 @default.
• W1973416187 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1973416187 hasAuthorship W1973416187A5055465960 @default.
• W1973416187 hasAuthorship W1973416187A5061746346 @default.
• W1973416187 hasAuthorship W1973416187A5062753017 @default.
• W1973416187 hasAuthorship W1973416187A5065011744 @default.
• W1973416187 hasAuthorship W1973416187A5078776935 @default.
• W1973416187 hasAuthorship W1973416187A5083945896 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C118231568 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C176933379 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C26771246 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C3020197141 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C104779481 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C112950240 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C118231568 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C159096172 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C159985019 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C176933379 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C180478085 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C192562407 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C199343813 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C202271784 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C26771246 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C2779227376 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C2779263046 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C3020197141 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C68928338 @default.
• W1973416187 hasConceptScore W1973416187C71924100 @default.
• W1973416187 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1973416187 hasLocation W19734161871 @default.
• W1973416187 hasLocation W19734161872 @default.
• W1973416187 hasOpenAccess W1973416187 @default.
• W1973416187 hasPrimaryLocation W19734161871 @default.
• W1973416187 hasRelatedWork W15928199 @default.
• W1973416187 hasRelatedWork W2138157871 @default.

• next