FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1973645885> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1973645885 endingPage "355" @default.
• W1973645885 startingPage "352" @default.
• W1973645885 abstract "Hebrew Studies 49 (2008) 352 Reviews pages for results from the study is a rather meager haul for an entire book of 200 pages. The methodological questions relating to use of the data from Mesopotamian , Egyptian, and Greek temples should have been debated. The positions taken and interpretations offered should have had more discussion in many cases. Each individual chapter should have had a concluding synthesis of what the chapter had demonstrated, and the final conclusion could have been of sufficient length and detail that it was clear what had been demonstrated by the book as a whole. There are many useful data here, but readers will have to analyze it for themselves. Lester L. Grabbe University of Hull Hull, England l.l.grabbe@hull.ac.uk THE FIRST BOOK OF SAMUEL. By David Toshio Tsumura. NICOT. Pp. xxii + 698. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2007. Cloth, $50.00. David Tsumura has given us a modern philological and literary commentary which addresses a number of issues that are not normally part of scholarly discourse. A comprehensive introduction reviews modern theories of the history of the text (including the latest publications on the texts from the Judean Desert), recent literary-historical and literary-structural/semiotic (‘holistic’) scholarship, historiography, historical and religious background, and questions of grammar and syntax. The present reviewer was happy to note chapters on discourse analysis, including an expose of Longacre’s approach and a note of viewpoint (though not from a literary angle). A chapter on prose and poetry discusses the structure of parallelism, poetic prose, different forms of repetition and brachylogy. The keys include an index of Subjects, Modern Authors, Scriptural references, and Foreign words (Hebrew, Akkadian, Ugaritic, Phoenician/Punic, and other ancient languages). 1 Samuel is considered to serve two purposes: the establishment of the monarchy and the preparation of David for the role of the king, all through the prophetic authority of Samuel as God’s messenger. The author’s critical position is fairly (and rationally) conservative. The final redaction of the book of Samuel is attributed to the late tenth century, in view of the note on the Judean crown possession of Ziklag which seems to refer to the period before the campaign of Shishak, and in any case does not make sense after the Assyrian conquest of the entire Philistine area Hebrew Studies 49 (2008) 353 Reviews (1 Sam 27:6, pp. 11, 612). The author rejects the assumption of such blocks as a comprehensive “Ark Narrative” (1 Samuel 4–7; 2 Samuel 6) and the “History of David’s Rise” (1 Samuel 16–2 Samuel 5), and tends to prefer smaller frames, such as the “Ark Narrative” (1 Samuel 4–7only), embedded within the Samuel History (1 Samuel 1–7), followed by a “Story of Saul” (1 Sam 9:1–15:35), and a “Story of Saul and David” (1 Samuel 16–31). Of these blocks, the Ark Narrative is tentatively attributed to the pre-Davidic era, in view of the lack of allusions to a royal cult in Jerusalem (pp. 11–12). The Saul-David Story is considered to reflect the political tensions in the time of David’s rule, and is intrinsically linked to the “Story of King David” (2 Samuel 1–20), in particular by means of the report of Saul’s death and David’s elegy in the opening chapter (pp. 13–16). The framework of 2 Samuel 21–24 is viewed as an epilogue that provides a thematic closure for the David tales, and in which the tale of the offering at the threshing floor of Araunah marks the transition to the account of Solomon’s Temple building. The author regards Solomon’s accession narrative (1 Kings 1–2) as an interface of David and Solomon tales (pp. 67–68). In Tsumura’s view, the contrast between the alleged pro-monarchic and anti-monarchic passages has been exaggerated (pp. 11, 248), seeing that in biblical context the human king always is considered the regent/deputy of God, as the heavenly king (pp. 249, 275, 282; following to a certain extent M. Tsevat). Instead of an anti-monarchic division, the author locates the tale on the “Transition to..." @default.
• W1973645885 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1973645885 creator A5011045346 @default.
• W1973645885 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W1973645885 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1973645885 title "<i>The First Book of Samuel</i> (review)" @default.
• W1973645885 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2008.0007" @default.
• W1973645885 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1973645885 type Work @default.
• W1973645885 sameAs 1973645885 @default.
• W1973645885 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1973645885 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1973645885 hasAuthorship W1973645885A5011045346 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C23987474 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C26022165 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C2777688943 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C60048249 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C91304198 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C107993555 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C124952713 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C138885662 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C142362112 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C144024400 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C164913051 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C166957645 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C17744445 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C199539241 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C23987474 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C26022165 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C2777688943 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C2778061430 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C29598333 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C41895202 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C60048249 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C74916050 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C91304198 @default.
• W1973645885 hasConceptScore W1973645885C95457728 @default.
• W1973645885 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1973645885 hasLocation W19736458851 @default.
• W1973645885 hasOpenAccess W1973645885 @default.
• W1973645885 hasPrimaryLocation W19736458851 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W2014283458 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W2051423673 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W2051493941 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W2592174098 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W4232017935 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W595181176 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W647500501 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W804128570 @default.
• W1973645885 hasRelatedWork W852142944 @default.
• W1973645885 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W1973645885 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1973645885 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1973645885 magId "1973645885" @default.
• W1973645885 workType "article" @default.