FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1974070172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1974070172 abstract "i. It is often, and sometimes accurately, said that first thoughts are best thoughts. In this paper I shall urge that the first thoughts of Peter Hacker' and (especially) Gordon Baker2 on the interpretation of Wittgenstein are indeed best thoughts, to be preferred to some of their more recent thoughts.3 I do not expect the argument here to be very original. Rather I shall try to use the tools provided by Baker and Hacker to attack their own more recent work. My chosen ground will be the notion of a criterion. I shall urge that this notion only makes sense within a certain view of meaning and understanding; and thus it cannot be given a use which is not '. . . arcane or theory-laden' (B & H (II), p. 7). To some extent, my target is a straw one, for Baker and Hacker admit that they have '. . . drawn a blank cheque upon volume 2 . . .' (B & H (II), p. 7) in their discussion both of 'criterion' and of 'grammar'. But enough of their view is apparent; and more could be drawn out although it is not strictly necessary to do so. It should be noted that, in a certain important way, I am not seeking to defend a traditional interpretation of Wittgenstein. Baker and Hacker rightly offer an interpretation quite different from those standardly given. But this is only because their early work failed to establish itself as the way to read Wittgenstein-at least, failed to do so for most Wittgenstein scholars. Baker and Hacker have taught me, through their early work, to have little sympathy for some views ascribed to Wittgenstein, and have provided a powerful way of interpreting his work in a unified, coherent fashion: namely, in terms of an articulation of a non-standard picture of meaning and understanding. I merely wish to argue that they must continue in that vein, and not take it back in their (justified) impatience with 'philosophical semantics'. But I.will not here seek to argue that Wittgenstein could not be interpreted in their new vein, merely that he should not. It is common ground to both parties that Wittgenstein's work is of central philosophical importance. So I shall content myself with arguing that the new interpretation renders Wittgenstein's work incoherent; a conclusion which I hope Baker and Hacker cannot accept." @default.
• W1974070172 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1974070172 creator A5003256131 @default.
• W1974070172 date "1981-01-01" @default.
• W1974070172 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1974070172 title "On the Interpretation of Wittgenstein" @default.
• W1974070172 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xc.360.592" @default.
• W1974070172 hasPublicationYear "1981" @default.
• W1974070172 type Work @default.
• W1974070172 sameAs 1974070172 @default.
• W1974070172 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1974070172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1974070172 hasAuthorship W1974070172A5003256131 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C2778828181 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C86844869 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C111472728 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C111919701 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C138885662 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C144024400 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C185592680 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C19165224 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C2778828181 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C2780876879 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C41008148 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C41895202 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C527412718 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C55493867 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C86844869 @default.
• W1974070172 hasConceptScore W1974070172C98184364 @default.
• W1974070172 hasLocation W19740701721 @default.
• W1974070172 hasOpenAccess W1974070172 @default.
• W1974070172 hasPrimaryLocation W19740701721 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W123307354 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W133369808 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W1480522421 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W178716961 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W1966428730 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2025219325 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2030942567 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2074394703 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2086478452 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2321770794 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2323193202 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2328524812 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2329632319 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2332820737 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2485250850 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2497783511 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2521120474 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W3211625598 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2176106615 @default.
• W1974070172 hasRelatedWork W2337248695 @default.
• W1974070172 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1974070172 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1974070172 magId "1974070172" @default.
• W1974070172 workType "article" @default.