FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1974174195> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1974174195 endingPage "75" @default.
• W1974174195 startingPage "66" @default.
• W1974174195 abstract "5 University of California San Diego, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, San Diego, California D ata collection, analysis, and presentation are key to the success of any hospital glycemic control initiative. Such efforts enable the management team to track improvements in processes and outcomes, make necessary changes to their quality improvement efforts, justify the provision of necessary time and resources, and share their results with others. Reliable metrics for assessing glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia are essential to accomplish these tasks and to assess whether interventions result in more benefit than harm. Hypoglycemia metrics must be especially convincing because fear of hypoglycemia remains a major source of clinical inertia, impeding efforts to improve glucose control. Currently, there are no official standards or guidelines for formulating metrics on the quality of inpatient glycemic control. This creates several problems. First, different metrics vary in their biases and in their responsiveness to change. Thus, use of a poor metric could lead to either a falsely positive or falsely negative impression that a quality improvement intervention is in fact improving glycemic control. Second, the proliferation of different measures and analytical plans in the research and quality improvement literature make it very difficult for hospitals to compare baseline performance, determine need for improvement, and understand which interventionsmay bemost effective. A related article in this supplement provides the rationale for improved inpatient glycemic control. That article argues that the current state of inpatient glycemic control, with the frequent occurrence of severe hyperglycemia and irrational insulin ordering, cannot be considered acceptable, especially given the large body of data (albeit largely observational) linking hyperglycemia to negative patient outcomes. However, regardless of whether one is an advocate or skeptic of tighter glucose control in the intensive care unit (ICU) and especially the non-ICU setting, there is no question that standardized, valid, and reliable metrics are needed to compare efforts to improve glycemic control, better understand whether such control actually improves patient care, and closely monitor patient safety. This article provides a summary of practical suggestions to assess glycemic control, insulin use patterns, and safety (hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia). In particular, we discuss the pros and cons of various measurement choices. We conclude with a tiered summary of recommendations for practical metrics No honoraria were paid to any authors for time and expertise spent on the writing of this article." @default.
• W1974174195 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1974174195 creator A5005006476 @default.
• W1974174195 creator A5035579369 @default.
• W1974174195 creator A5035736412 @default.
• W1974174195 creator A5081132781 @default.
• W1974174195 creator A5082131619 @default.
• W1974174195 date "2008-10-24" @default.
• W1974174195 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1974174195 title "Society of hospital medicine glycemic control task force summary: Practical recommendations for assessing the impact of glycemic control efforts" @default.
• W1974174195 cites W1967030476 @default.
• W1974174195 cites W1991659605 @default.
• W1974174195 cites W2062055324 @default.
• W1974174195 cites W2134129601 @default.
• W1974174195 cites W2161088630 @default.
• W1974174195 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.356" @default.
• W1974174195 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18951387" @default.
• W1974174195 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1974174195 type Work @default.
• W1974174195 sameAs 1974174195 @default.
• W1974174195 citedByCount "70" @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952012 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952013 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952014 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952015 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952016 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952017 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952018 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952019 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952020 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952021 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952022 @default.
• W1974174195 countsByYear W19741741952023 @default.
• W1974174195 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1974174195 hasAuthorship W1974174195A5005006476 @default.
• W1974174195 hasAuthorship W1974174195A5035579369 @default.
• W1974174195 hasAuthorship W1974174195A5035736412 @default.
• W1974174195 hasAuthorship W1974174195A5081132781 @default.
• W1974174195 hasAuthorship W1974174195A5082131619 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C2780358146 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C2780473172 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C2985871740 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C134018914 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C162324750 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C17744445 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C177713679 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C187736073 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C2775924081 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C2780358146 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C2780473172 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C2985871740 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C3116431 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C512399662 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C555293320 @default.
• W1974174195 hasConceptScore W1974174195C71924100 @default.
• W1974174195 hasIssue "S5" @default.
• W1974174195 hasLocation W19741741951 @default.
• W1974174195 hasLocation W19741741952 @default.
• W1974174195 hasOpenAccess W1974174195 @default.
• W1974174195 hasPrimaryLocation W19741741951 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W1974174195 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W2015670292 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W2110217064 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W2316059497 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W2530789867 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W2762039367 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W2981857729 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W3187999478 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W4243328821 @default.
• W1974174195 hasRelatedWork W4254665112 @default.
• W1974174195 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W1974174195 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1974174195 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1974174195 magId "1974174195" @default.
• W1974174195 workType "article" @default.