FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1974647159> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1974647159 endingPage "118" @default.
• W1974647159 startingPage "111" @default.
• W1974647159 abstract "ABSTRACT Background The General Level Framework (GLF) is a tool for evaluating pharmacists' performance, providing tailored feedback and training, and guiding professional development. Aim To ascertain the changes in pharmacists' workplace performance over time using the GLF and to describe pharmacists' views on the baseline evaluation process. Method The UK GLF was mapped against Australian pharmacy competency standards and practice guidelines. 61 of the 92 competencies from the Queensland Health version of the GLF representing core professional activities of Australian pharmacists were analysed. Trained evaluators used the adapted GLF to observe pharmacists from 18 Queensland public hospitals in their workplace (baseline and repeat) and rate the frequency with which competencies were completed to a defined standard. The evaluators then provided pharmacists with tailored feedback, encouraged self‐problem solving, and identified and addressed their training needs. Pharmacists' views of the baseline evaluation process was assessed using a 7‐point rating scale. Results 66 pharmacists from 18 Queensland hospitals underwent the evaluation. At baseline, pharmacists had a median of 3 (1 to 10) years hospital experience. A median of 14 (5 to 22) months lapsed between baseline and repeat observations. Of the 61 competencies analysed, 35 (57%) competencies showed a significant improvement from baseline to repeat observations (p = 0.05). Competencies that improved significantly from baseline included: aspects of medication history taking; medication management; identification, documentation and resolution of drug‐related problems; appraisal of therapeutic options; and communication with doctors and nurses. For 9 (15%) competencies, pharmacists were already performing at the maximum level (median score 4) at baseline and no change was recorded between observations. No competency demonstrated a decrease in performance between observations. When the mean scores with 95% confidence intervals for the clusters of competencies were compared over time all the mean scores except for discharge facilitation and medicines information/patient education/liaison showed a significant improvement. 52 pharmacists provided feedback on the baseline evaluation process and the majority found it a useful professional development tool. They considered the evaluation process fair and constructive but taxing. Conclusion The GLF tool assisted with the identification of pharmacists' training needs, which are integral to their professional development." @default.
• W1974647159 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5006636755 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5010923519 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5012874881 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5015580764 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5028155982 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5052015651 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5075522829 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5076877328 @default.
• W1974647159 creator A5082999612 @default.
• W1974647159 date "2010-06-01" @default.
• W1974647159 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1974647159 title "Improvement in Pharmacist's Performance Facilitated by an Adapted Competency‐Based General Level Framework" @default.
• W1974647159 cites W1569488152 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W195149570 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W1969299479 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W1970156476 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W1971061593 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W1991283062 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W1991635648 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2049745331 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2057086382 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2058546125 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2071526170 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2101577705 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2115173015 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2118443340 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2139001711 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2159747858 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2165725416 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W2344975681 @default.
• W1974647159 cites W4205862321 @default.
• W1974647159 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2055-2335.2010.tb00517.x" @default.
• W1974647159 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1974647159 type Work @default.
• W1974647159 sameAs 1974647159 @default.
• W1974647159 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592012 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592013 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592014 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592015 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592016 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592017 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592018 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592019 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592020 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592021 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592022 @default.
• W1974647159 countsByYear W19746471592023 @default.
• W1974647159 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5006636755 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5010923519 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5012874881 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5015580764 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5028155982 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5052015651 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5075522829 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5076877328 @default.
• W1974647159 hasAuthorship W1974647159A5082999612 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C12725497 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C164065428 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C2779457091 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C104863432 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C111368507 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C12725497 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C127313418 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C144133560 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C159110408 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C162853370 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C164065428 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C199360897 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C2779457091 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C41008148 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C509550671 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C512399662 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C56666940 @default.
• W1974647159 hasConceptScore W1974647159C71924100 @default.
• W1974647159 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1974647159 hasLocation W19746471591 @default.
• W1974647159 hasOpenAccess W1974647159 @default.
• W1974647159 hasPrimaryLocation W19746471591 @default.
• W1974647159 hasRelatedWork W2022079104 @default.
• W1974647159 hasRelatedWork W2052892900 @default.
• W1974647159 hasRelatedWork W2260182467 @default.
• W1974647159 hasRelatedWork W2323670552 @default.

• next