FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1975647570> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1975647570 endingPage "S7" @default.
• W1975647570 startingPage "S6" @default.
• W1975647570 abstract "OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy loss results in not only a loss of a potential baby but also a delay in resuming fertility treatment. Patients who do not pass the products of conception (POC) naturally must decide between medical & surgical management. The surgical option, a Dilatation & Curretage (D&C), provides possible karyotyping of POC, but is invasive and carries the risk of uterine scarring. Medical management with misoprostol presents a viable alternative, although it may delay subsequent fertility treatment. We compared the time to resumption of fertility treatment in patients treated with misoprostol vs. D&C.DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with misoprostol (800mg per vagina) from 2003-2010 were compared with a control group of patients undergoing D&C. Time to reach a negative serum βhCG and to the next fertility treatment were calculated. The rate of known retained POC was also analyzed. Student-t test and χ2 were used.Tabled 1D&C (n=44)Misoprostol (n=19)p valueTreatment to Negative βhCG37.2 ± 16.037.7 ± 15.0NSTreatment to Next Cycle54.5 ± 19.560.3 ± 42.4NSRetained POC2%26%<0.05Karyotype Obtained68%5%<0.05 Open table in a new tab CONCLUSION: We did not confirm a perceived benefit of faster return to fertility treatment for surgically managed patients. While medical treatment did not delay the average time, a significant number of patients suffered from retained POC and required a D&C. It is important for providers to discuss with their patients the benefits and risks associated with both treatments. Although a D&C is more likely to provide POC for karyotyping, medical management of miscarriage is a viable alternative in patients undergoing reproductive treatment. OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy loss results in not only a loss of a potential baby but also a delay in resuming fertility treatment. Patients who do not pass the products of conception (POC) naturally must decide between medical & surgical management. The surgical option, a Dilatation & Curretage (D&C), provides possible karyotyping of POC, but is invasive and carries the risk of uterine scarring. Medical management with misoprostol presents a viable alternative, although it may delay subsequent fertility treatment. We compared the time to resumption of fertility treatment in patients treated with misoprostol vs. D&C. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with misoprostol (800mg per vagina) from 2003-2010 were compared with a control group of patients undergoing D&C. Time to reach a negative serum βhCG and to the next fertility treatment were calculated. The rate of known retained POC was also analyzed. Student-t test and χ2 were used. CONCLUSION: We did not confirm a perceived benefit of faster return to fertility treatment for surgically managed patients. While medical treatment did not delay the average time, a significant number of patients suffered from retained POC and required a D&C. It is important for providers to discuss with their patients the benefits and risks associated with both treatments. Although a D&C is more likely to provide POC for karyotyping, medical management of miscarriage is a viable alternative in patients undergoing reproductive treatment." @default.
• W1975647570 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1975647570 creator A5013163192 @default.
• W1975647570 creator A5027557336 @default.
• W1975647570 creator A5032268660 @default.
• W1975647570 creator A5033242458 @default.
• W1975647570 creator A5044288812 @default.
• W1975647570 creator A5064970175 @default.
• W1975647570 date "2010-09-01" @default.
• W1975647570 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1975647570 title "Does surgical management of a missed abortion provide a more rapid return to fertility treatment than medical management in a fertility practice?" @default.
• W1975647570 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.024" @default.
• W1975647570 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1975647570 type Work @default.
• W1975647570 sameAs 1975647570 @default.
• W1975647570 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1975647570 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1975647570 hasAuthorship W1975647570A5013163192 @default.
• W1975647570 hasAuthorship W1975647570A5027557336 @default.
• W1975647570 hasAuthorship W1975647570A5032268660 @default.
• W1975647570 hasAuthorship W1975647570A5033242458 @default.
• W1975647570 hasAuthorship W1975647570A5044288812 @default.
• W1975647570 hasAuthorship W1975647570A5064970175 @default.
• W1975647570 hasBestOaLocation W19756475701 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C2777744392 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C2779199973 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C2780343435 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C518429986 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C131872663 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C141071460 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C2777744392 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C2778642596 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C2779199973 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C2779234561 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C2780343435 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C2908647359 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C29456083 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C518429986 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C54355233 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C71924100 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C86803240 @default.
• W1975647570 hasConceptScore W1975647570C99454951 @default.
• W1975647570 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1975647570 hasLocation W19756475701 @default.
• W1975647570 hasOpenAccess W1975647570 @default.
• W1975647570 hasPrimaryLocation W19756475701 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W1986162395 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2016048958 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2026040466 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2142386766 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2331503497 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2403050340 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2776949789 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2911223620 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W2921004047 @default.
• W1975647570 hasRelatedWork W4313644146 @default.
• W1975647570 hasVolume "94" @default.
• W1975647570 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1975647570 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1975647570 magId "1975647570" @default.
• W1975647570 workType "article" @default.