Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976016645> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W1976016645 endingPage "647" @default.
- W1976016645 startingPage "642" @default.
- W1976016645 abstract "Background Surgeons are increasingly considering resection and primary anastomosis when treating left-sided colonic obstruction or perforation in preference to the more traditional staged procedures. Previous studies in the United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA) have suggested a greater interest in single-staged procedures amongst UK surgeons. This study was aimed to directly compare the treatment preferences between UK and US surgeons. Method A questionnaire, designed to determine the procedure of choice when faced with left-sided colonic emergencies in patients with good and poor anaesthetic risk, was sent to 500 surgeons in the UK and 500 surgeons in the USA. Results UK surgeons were more likely to perform resection, primary anastomosis and on-table colonic lavage in patients with sigmoid obstruction (good anaesthetic risk: P < 0.0001; poor risk: P < 0.01) and sigmoid perforation (good risk: P < 0.0001). In good-risk patients with sigmoid obstruction, US surgeons were more likely than UK to choose Hartmann’s procedure (P < 0.0001). US surgeons performing primary anastomosis were less likely to perform on-table lavage. Conclusion Single-stage procedures are widely accepted as viable treatment options in both the UK and the USA when dealing with left-sided colonic emergencies. British surgeons are more likely to favour single-staged procedures, particularly with on-table colonic lavage, when compared with US surgeons." @default.
- W1976016645 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1976016645 creator A5025109132 @default.
- W1976016645 creator A5047547724 @default.
- W1976016645 creator A5058905663 @default.
- W1976016645 creator A5088579099 @default.
- W1976016645 date "2009-07-01" @default.
- W1976016645 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W1976016645 title "Treatment of left-sided colonic emergencies: a comparison of US and UK surgical practices" @default.
- W1976016645 cites W1965571645 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W1972080250 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W1983230230 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2014010118 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2020075533 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2020911914 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2030139254 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2040198839 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2049321611 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2054868273 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2059299197 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2059505037 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2064390375 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2091142457 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2103525665 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W2162915800 @default.
- W1976016645 cites W4236434547 @default.
- W1976016645 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01631.x" @default.
- W1976016645 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18637938" @default.
- W1976016645 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W1976016645 type Work @default.
- W1976016645 sameAs 1976016645 @default.
- W1976016645 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452012 @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452013 @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452015 @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452016 @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452017 @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452019 @default.
- W1976016645 countsByYear W19760166452021 @default.
- W1976016645 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1976016645 hasAuthorship W1976016645A5025109132 @default.
- W1976016645 hasAuthorship W1976016645A5047547724 @default.
- W1976016645 hasAuthorship W1976016645A5058905663 @default.
- W1976016645 hasAuthorship W1976016645A5088579099 @default.
- W1976016645 hasBestOaLocation W19760166451 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C2776870353 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C141071460 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C191897082 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C192562407 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C2776870353 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C2778456384 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C2778527123 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C2781074409 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C61434518 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C71924100 @default.
- W1976016645 hasConceptScore W1976016645C8443397 @default.
- W1976016645 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W1976016645 hasLocation W19760166451 @default.
- W1976016645 hasLocation W19760166452 @default.
- W1976016645 hasOpenAccess W1976016645 @default.
- W1976016645 hasPrimaryLocation W19760166451 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2376769477 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2389680203 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2980476049 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W4376602029 @default.
- W1976016645 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W1976016645 hasVolume "11" @default.
- W1976016645 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1976016645 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1976016645 magId "1976016645" @default.
- W1976016645 workType "article" @default.