FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976017890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976017890 endingPage "890" @default.
• W1976017890 startingPage "883" @default.
• W1976017890 abstract "This investigation aimed to examine the effects of word frequency and lexical neighborhood density on spoken word recognition of monosyllables and disyllables in Mandarin by normal hearing children and children with cochlear implants. The lexical characteristics were incorporated from the Neighborhood Activation Model (NAM), which suggests that words in the mental lexicon are organized into similarity neighborhoods. The difficulty of a listener's task is affected by the frequency of the target word and the density of the lexical neighbors from which that word must be identified. The Monosyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test and the Disyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test in Mandarin Chinese (Mandarin LNT and MLNT) were developed to take into account the effects of these linguistic and cognitive demands on speech perception performance.Three stages were conducted in this investigation. In the first stage, Mandarin words of monosyllables and disyllables were selected and their lexical properties were calculated from the CHILDES database. Four lexically easy and four lexically hard word lists in Mandarin LNT as well as two word lists across lexical properties among disyllables were determined based on their relative word frequencies and neighborhood densities. In the second stage, word stimuli were verified by 30 children of the NH group and 36 children from the CI group. In the third stage, the inter-list equivalency and test-retest reliability of word lists across lexical properties were determined, and the correlations of Mandarin LNT and MLNT with other measures and inter-rater reliability were also investigated.Word recognition scores were higher among disyllables than among monosyllables. Lexically easy disyllabic words were better recognized than their hard counterparts and the monosyllables among two groups of children. However, no lexical effects on word recognition of Mandarin monosyllables were observed for either group. No significant differences were found among word lists in each combination of syllable structure and lexical property. Inter-rater reliability, inter-list equivalency, and test-retest reliability were revealed. The Mandarin LNT and MLNT were found to be highly reliable measures of spoken word recognition (r = 0.84; p < 0.01) with acceptable equivalency between lists (r = 0.638-0.876).Lexical effects on Mandarin word recognition were only demonstrated among disyllabic words by NH and the CI children, while Mandarin homophones appearing in monosyllabic words were suggested. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition in Mandarin are not substantially demonstrated as in English, but the Mandarin LNT and MLNT provided reliable information on the spoken word recognition of pediatric CI users in the initial stage after implantation as well as in the rehabilitation progress." @default.
• W1976017890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976017890 creator A5048473844 @default.
• W1976017890 creator A5058990058 @default.
• W1976017890 creator A5071513239 @default.
• W1976017890 date "2010-08-01" @default.
• W1976017890 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1976017890 title "Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants" @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1802064772 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1964809037 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1968054595 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1971942174 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1973613824 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1982015909 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1984961290 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1998813010 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W1999260169 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2010906431 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2011691567 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2014089856 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2026744205 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2026992087 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2030345124 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2031350114 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2043210561 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2052395331 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2058494179 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2080287844 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2084716471 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2118960194 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2120359452 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2120681907 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2136722356 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2146737317 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2159157038 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2396436993 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2404296221 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W2414014569 @default.
• W1976017890 cites W4246869648 @default.
• W1976017890 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.05.005" @default.
• W1976017890 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20846499" @default.
• W1976017890 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1976017890 type Work @default.
• W1976017890 sameAs 1976017890 @default.
• W1976017890 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W1976017890 countsByYear W19760178902013 @default.
• W1976017890 countsByYear W19760178902015 @default.
• W1976017890 countsByYear W19760178902016 @default.
• W1976017890 countsByYear W19760178902020 @default.
• W1976017890 countsByYear W19760178902022 @default.
• W1976017890 countsByYear W19760178902023 @default.
• W1976017890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976017890 hasAuthorship W1976017890A5048473844 @default.
• W1976017890 hasAuthorship W1976017890A5058990058 @default.
• W1976017890 hasAuthorship W1976017890A5071513239 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C138954614 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C2776671715 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C2778121359 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C90805587 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConcept C99209842 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C138885662 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C138954614 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C15744967 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C169760540 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C204321447 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C26760741 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C2776671715 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C2778121359 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C41008148 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C41895202 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C548259974 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C71924100 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C90805587 @default.
• W1976017890 hasConceptScore W1976017890C99209842 @default.
• W1976017890 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1976017890 hasLocation W19760178901 @default.
• W1976017890 hasLocation W19760178902 @default.
• W1976017890 hasOpenAccess W1976017890 @default.
• W1976017890 hasPrimaryLocation W19760178901 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W2019792323 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W2067502238 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W2076000237 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W2372793594 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W2888133614 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W3016775004 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W3024604406 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W3164157819 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W4290851892 @default.
• W1976017890 hasRelatedWork W4310147365 @default.

• next