FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976253963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976253963 endingPage "1680" @default.
• W1976253963 startingPage "1672" @default.
• W1976253963 abstract "Objective The aims of this study were to assess (1) the relationship between interocular suppression and visual function in patients with anisometropic amblyopia, (2) whether suppression can be simulated in matched controls using monocular defocus or neutral density filters, (3) the effects of spectacle or rigid gas-permeable contact lens correction on suppression in patients with anisometropic amblyopia, and (4) the relationship between interocular suppression and outcomes of occlusion therapy. Design Case-control study (aims 1–3) and cohort study (aim 4). Participants Forty-five participants with anisometropic amblyopia and 45 matched controls (mean age, 8.8 years for both groups). Methods Interocular suppression was assessed using Bagolini striated lenses, neutral density filters, and an objective psychophysical technique that measures the amount of contrast imbalance between the 2 eyes that is required to overcome suppression (dichoptic motion coherence thresholds). Visual acuity was assessed using a logarithm minimum angle of resolution tumbling E chart and stereopsis using the Randot preschool test. Main Outcome Measures Interocular suppression assessed using dichoptic motion coherence thresholds. Results Patients exhibited significantly stronger suppression than controls, and stronger suppression was correlated significantly with poorer visual acuity in amblyopic eyes. Reducing monocular acuity in controls to match that of cases using neutral density filters (luminance reduction) resulted in levels of interocular suppression comparable with that in patients. This was not the case for monocular defocus (optical blur). Rigid gas-permeable contact lens correction resulted in less suppression than spectacle correction, and stronger suppression was associated with poorer outcomes after occlusion therapy. Conclusions Interocular suppression plays a key role in the visual deficits associated with anisometropic amblyopia and can be simulated in controls by inducing a luminance difference between the eyes. Accurate quantification of suppression using the dichoptic motion coherence threshold technique may provide useful information for the management and treatment of anisometropic amblyopia. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. The aims of this study were to assess (1) the relationship between interocular suppression and visual function in patients with anisometropic amblyopia, (2) whether suppression can be simulated in matched controls using monocular defocus or neutral density filters, (3) the effects of spectacle or rigid gas-permeable contact lens correction on suppression in patients with anisometropic amblyopia, and (4) the relationship between interocular suppression and outcomes of occlusion therapy. Case-control study (aims 1–3) and cohort study (aim 4). Forty-five participants with anisometropic amblyopia and 45 matched controls (mean age, 8.8 years for both groups). Interocular suppression was assessed using Bagolini striated lenses, neutral density filters, and an objective psychophysical technique that measures the amount of contrast imbalance between the 2 eyes that is required to overcome suppression (dichoptic motion coherence thresholds). Visual acuity was assessed using a logarithm minimum angle of resolution tumbling E chart and stereopsis using the Randot preschool test. Interocular suppression assessed using dichoptic motion coherence thresholds. Patients exhibited significantly stronger suppression than controls, and stronger suppression was correlated significantly with poorer visual acuity in amblyopic eyes. Reducing monocular acuity in controls to match that of cases using neutral density filters (luminance reduction) resulted in levels of interocular suppression comparable with that in patients. This was not the case for monocular defocus (optical blur). Rigid gas-permeable contact lens correction resulted in less suppression than spectacle correction, and stronger suppression was associated with poorer outcomes after occlusion therapy. Interocular suppression plays a key role in the visual deficits associated with anisometropic amblyopia and can be simulated in controls by inducing a luminance difference between the eyes. Accurate quantification of suppression using the dichoptic motion coherence threshold technique may provide useful information for the management and treatment of anisometropic amblyopia." @default.
• W1976253963 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5013808307 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5031450974 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5046082086 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5055799653 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5060246701 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5064194001 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5077148923 @default.
• W1976253963 creator A5084537221 @default.
• W1976253963 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W1976253963 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1976253963 title "Quantitative Measurement of Interocular Suppression in Anisometropic Amblyopia" @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1964430966 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1975460162 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1979836815 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1984306071 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1985441534 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1990036655 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1991105185 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W1999316812 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2003621613 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2006316042 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2020091125 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2034673513 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2046941905 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2053083177 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2057809729 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2060803082 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2071299937 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2082401313 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2084146775 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2095696274 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2104220712 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2111456365 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2114937600 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2124038949 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2127442710 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2146933450 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2148916325 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2150952866 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2151465962 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2165555701 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2317792275 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W2326928796 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W281743393 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W4239259035 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W61193835 @default.
• W1976253963 cites W97765374 @default.
• W1976253963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.048" @default.
• W1976253963 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23622875" @default.
• W1976253963 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1976253963 type Work @default.
• W1976253963 sameAs 1976253963 @default.
• W1976253963 citedByCount "72" @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632014 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632015 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632016 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632017 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632018 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632019 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632020 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632021 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632022 @default.
• W1976253963 countsByYear W19762539632023 @default.
• W1976253963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5013808307 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5031450974 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5046082086 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5055799653 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5060246701 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5064194001 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5077148923 @default.
• W1976253963 hasAuthorship W1976253963A5084537221 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C168260308 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2776268601 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2780365402 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2780773893 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2781135284 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C2986805488 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C65909025 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C68537008 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C118487528 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C119767625 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C120665830 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C121332964 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C141071460 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C168260308 @default.
• W1976253963 hasConceptScore W1976253963C2776268601 @default.

• next