FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976276572> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976276572 endingPage "22208" @default.
• W1976276572 startingPage "22204" @default.
• W1976276572 abstract "Protein carbonylation is an irreversible oxidative process leading to a loss of function of the modified proteins, and in a variety of model systems, including worms, flies, and mammals, carbonyl levels gradually increase with age. In contrast, we report here that in Arabidopsis thaliana an initial increase in protein oxidation during the first 20 days of the life cycle of the plant is followed by a drastic reduction in protein carbonyls prior to bolting and flower development. Protein carbonylation prior to the transition to flowering targets specific proteins such as Hsp70, ATP synthases, the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), and proteins involved in light harvesting/energy transfer and the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle. The precipitous fall in protein carbonyl levels is due to the specific reduction in the levels of oxidized proteins rather than an overall loss of chlorophyll and Rubisco associated with the senescence syndrome. The results are discussed in light of contemporary theories of aging in animals. Protein carbonylation is an irreversible oxidative process leading to a loss of function of the modified proteins, and in a variety of model systems, including worms, flies, and mammals, carbonyl levels gradually increase with age. In contrast, we report here that in Arabidopsis thaliana an initial increase in protein oxidation during the first 20 days of the life cycle of the plant is followed by a drastic reduction in protein carbonyls prior to bolting and flower development. Protein carbonylation prior to the transition to flowering targets specific proteins such as Hsp70, ATP synthases, the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), and proteins involved in light harvesting/energy transfer and the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle. The precipitous fall in protein carbonyl levels is due to the specific reduction in the levels of oxidized proteins rather than an overall loss of chlorophyll and Rubisco associated with the senescence syndrome. The results are discussed in light of contemporary theories of aging in animals. Endogenously generated reactive oxygen species, produced by the electron transport chains, react with different macromolecules in the cell and cause oxidative damage. Such oxidative damage accumulates over time during the life cycle of many organisms and has been suggested to be one possible cause of aging (1Stadtman E.R. Science. 1992; 257: 1220-1224Crossref PubMed Scopus (2374) Google Scholar, 2Sohal R.S. Agarwal S. Dubey A. Orr W.C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993; 90: 7255-7259Crossref PubMed Scopus (319) Google Scholar). Protein carbonylation is a widely used marker of protein oxidation, and sensitive methods for its detection have been developed by Stadtman and Levine (3Levine R.L. Garland D. Oliver C.N. Amici A. Climent I. Lenz A.G. Ahn B.W. Shaltiel S. Stadtman E.R. Methods Enzymol. 1990; 186: 464-478Crossref PubMed Scopus (4844) Google Scholar). Direct oxidative attack on Lys, Arg, Pro, and Thr or by secondary reactions via reactive carbohydrates and lipids on Cys, His, and Lys residues can lead to the formation of protein carbonyl derivatives (4Pantke U. Volk T. Schmutzler M. Kox W.J. Sitte N. Grune T. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999; 27: 1080-1086Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, 5Berlett B.S. Stadtman E.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 20313-20316Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2749) Google Scholar). Carbonylation of proteins inhibits or alters the activities of the proteins and increases their susceptibility to proteolytic attack (5Berlett B.S. Stadtman E.R. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 20313-20316Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2749) Google Scholar, 6Rivett A.J. Levine R.L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990; 278: 26-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar). In rats, aged flies, and senescing yeast and bacteria, this oxidation has been shown to be specific and targets enzymes of the Krebs cycle and other proteins, including stress proteins, Hsp70 chaperones, and translation elongation factors (7Dukan S. Nystrom T. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3431-3441Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar, 8Cabiscol E. Piulats E. Echave P. Herrero E. Ros J. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 27393-27398Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 9Nakamura A. Goto S. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 1996; 119: 768-774Crossref PubMed Scopus (150) Google Scholar, 10Das N. Levine R.L. Orr W.C. Sohal R.S. Biochem. J. 2001; 360: 209-216Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar). In contrast, little is known about the occurrence of and targets for protein oxidation during the life cycle of annual plants. The annual model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has a life cycle from seed to seed of about 6 weeks under optimal growth conditions. After germination, the above ground portion of the Arabidopsis plant initially develops two cotyledons and later a compressed rosette of leaves. All structures originate from the apical shoot meristem (11Clark S.E. Plant Cell. 1997; 9: 1067-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar, 12Kerstetter R.A. Hake S. Plant Cell. 1997; 9: 1001-1010Crossref PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar). Later the shoot apical meristem will undergo a transition to an inflorescence meristem. Under long day conditions this occurs when the plant has six to ten leaves, although this varies with the genetic background and the environmental conditions. Somewhat later, after the main stem has elongated and produced a complex of higher order branches, a transition to a flower meristem occurs, from which the reproductive organs develop. After fertilization and as the seeds mature, the somatic tissues of the whole plant become increasingly senescent. Leaf senescence is the final stage of leaf development that ultimately results in the death of the plant (reviewed in Ref. 13Bleecker A.B. Patterson S.E. Plant Cell. 1997; 9: 1169-1179Crossref PubMed Scopus (324) Google Scholar). During this final stage, the leaf cells undergo a programmed cell death process, referred to as the senescence syndrome (14Nooden L.D. Nooden L.D. Leopold A.C. Senescene and Aging in Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA1988: 1-50Google Scholar). The most widely used biomarker for the senescence syndrome is the loss of chlorophyll associated with the degeneration of chloroplast internal structures (15Thomson W.W. Plat-Aloia K.A. Thomson W.W. Nothnagel E.A. Huffaker R.C. Plant Senescence: Its Biochemistry and Physiology. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD1987: 20-30Google Scholar). Leaf senescence is an intrinsic age-dependent process and its onset appears to be regulated by the age of individual leaves (16Hensel L.L. Grbic V. Baumgarten D.A. Bleecker A.B. Plant Cell. 1993; 5: 553-564PubMed Google Scholar). We demonstrate here that the quantitative and qualitative pattern of carbonylation during progression through the life cycle of the plant A. thaliana is distinct from that of the yeast, fly, nematode, and mammalian model systems. Carbonylation first increases with the age of the plant, similar to animals and microbes, but drops abruptly prior to the vegetative to reproductive transition and does not coincide with leaf senescence. Proteomic identification of the major targets for protein carbonylation in the plant leaves indicates that proteins directly and indirectly linked to chloroplast activities exhibit special problems with respect to oxidative damage. The data highlight that there is no inevitable, stochastic, increase in protein oxidation in aging tissues of the plant A. thaliana. Culturing Conditions—Wild-type A. thaliana plants (ecotype Col-0) were grown on a mixture of 2:1:1 of soil:vermiculite:perlite in a greenhouse in a day/night temperature regime of 22/18 °C, an 18-h photoperiod, a photon flux density of 125 μmol m-2 s-1, and a relative humidity of 70%. Plants were watered twice a week with a nutrition solution as described (17Somerville C. Ogren W.L. Edelman M. Hallick R.B. Chua N.H. Methods in Chloroplast Biology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam1982: 129-138Google Scholar). Isolation of Cellular Proteins—Protein extractions and chlorophyll measurements were from leaf number 5 and 6, unless the extractions were from very young plants in which case the whole seedlings were used. Rosette leaves from different life stages were grinded in liquid N2 using a precooled mortar and pestle. The powder was resuspended in a buffer containing 250 mm Tris-Cl, pH 8.5, 0.5 mm EDTA, 2% lithium dodecyl sulfate, 10% glycerol, and 2 mm pefabloc (protease inhibitor, Roche Applied Science). The sample was heated for 5 min at 75 °C. Tubes were cooled and centrifuged at 20,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and the protein was acetone-extracted by addition of acetone to a final concentration of 80% (v/v) at -20 °C for 30 min and then centrifuged for 20,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature. After centrifugation and vacuum drying, the protein pellet was resuspended in the same buffer as above and stored at -20 °C after the protein concentration had been determined. The concentration of proteins was estimated using Pierce BCA protein quantification kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. The relative abundance of Rubisco 1The abbreviations used are: Rubisco, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase; DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone; DNPH, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine; TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)-ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic acid; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid. was determined using specific antibodies (from Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden) and Western blotting. As a secondary antibody, anti-chicken IgG from Sigma (product number A9046) was used. Carbonylation Assays—Detection of carbonylated proteins was performed using the chemical and immunological reagents of the OxyBlot™ Oxidized Protein Detection Kit (Intergen). The carbonyl groups in the protein side chains were derivatized to 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone (DNP) by reaction with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH). The chemiluminescence blotting substrate (ECLplus) was obtained from Amersham Biosciences and used according to instructions provided by the manufacturer. Immobilon-P polyvinylidene diflouride membrane was from Millipore Corp. As described above, crude protein extracts were obtained during the different life stages of the plant, the extracts were reacted with the carbonyl reagent, DNPH, dot-blotted onto polyvinylidene diflouride membranes, and oxidatively modified proteins were detected with anti-DNP antibodies. In general, 5 μg of protein were loaded into the slot-blot apparatus and 50 μg onto two-dimensional gels. Isolation of Mitochondria—All steps included in mitochondrial isolations were performed at 4 °C. Leaves (or whole seedlings) were harvested and immediately prepared. 5–10 g w/w was homogenized in 50 ml of grinding medium (0.3 m sucrose, 25 mm tetrasodium pyrophosphate, 2 mm EDTA, 10 mm KH2PO4, 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone-40, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 20 mm ascorbic acid, pH 7.2) using a chilled mortar and pestle. The homogenate was filtered through a single layer of damp, chilled, fine filter cloth and centrifuged at 4500 rpm (Beckmann JA-21 centrifuge, JA-20 rotor, ∼3000 × g) at 4 °C for 5 min. Supernatants were kept and centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 rpm (∼17,000 × g). Pellets were collected and resuspended in a small volume of wash buffer (0.15 M sucrose, 10 mm TES, and 0.05% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.2) using a soft, small brush. The solution was combined into two tubes, which were filled up with wash buffer, and two centrifugation steps, as described above, were performed. Pellets containing the mitochondria were resuspended in a small volume of wash buffer and layered on top of a step Percoll gradient (gradient solution consisting of 0.75 m sucrose, 25 mm MOPS, 2.5 mm EDTA, and 0.5% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.2) at 21, 29, and 60%. The gradient was centrifuged for 40 min at 18 000 rpm (∼40,000 × g). The interface of the heaviest and the middle gradient densities contained the mitochondria. The band was collected by aspiration with a 1-ml pipetteman and diluted with wash buffer in a chilled 15-ml corex tube. This tube was centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 rpm (∼27,000 × g). Pellets were resuspended in wash buffer and centrifuged once as described above. The pellet containing the purified mitochondria was resuspended in a small volume of wash buffer. The protein content was quantified after acetone precipitation. Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis—Protein extracts were prepared and run on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels by the methods of O'Farrell (18O'Farrell P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1975; 250: 4007-4021Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) with modifications (7Dukan S. Nystrom T. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3431-3441Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar). Ampholines with a pH range of 3.5–10 from Amersham Biosciences AB were used. Gel electrophoresis was carried out using 11.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the gels were either stained with Coomassie Blue or immunoblotted according to standard procedures. Signal intensities in gels and blots were analyzed by the computer program PDQuest (Bio-Rad). This program detects the chemiluminescence signal contributed by each separate protein spot and divides it by the total chemiluminescence signal of the whole blot. The program also detects the intensity of the Coomassie spot contributed by each protein spot and divides it with the intensity of the total Coomassie intensity of the whole gel. By making a ratio of these parameters a relative measurement of carbonylation/amount of protein can be calculated (the oxidation index). Mass Spectrometry—Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight data were acquired on an [email protected] (Micromass, Manchester, UK) in reflectron mode and ESI data in mass spectrometry and mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry mode on a Q-Tof Ultima (Micromass, Manchester, UK). Protein identifications were done using MASCOT (available at www.matrixscience.com). Proteins were identified against the nr protein data base at NCBI, where a score of 74 corresponds to a 95% confidence level. All proteins were identified with scores above 95. Protein Oxidation Is Age-dependent—A. thaliana plants (ecotype Col-0) were grown in a photoperiod of 18 h of light and 6 h of darkness, and protein extractions were made from different life cycle stages, ranging from before bolting to 25% leaf senescence. As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, protein carbonyl levels per total protein first increases as the rosette leaves becomes chronologically older. However, this increase is followed by an abrupt decrease in oxidation levels around 20 days after planting. The carbonylation levels in the last stages of the life cycle of the plant did not change (not shown). To evaluate whether there was any difference in carbonylation status during the photoperiod (day) and the period of active mitochondrial respiration (night), total cellular protein was extracted from plants, either 4 h after the light was switched on or 5 h after the light was switched off. The carbonyl signal from these two conditions was quantified and demonstrated the same trend in terms of the kinetics of protein oxidation during the plant life cycle (Fig. 1B). The growth conditions used resulted in bolting between 23 and 26 days after planting. In parallel to carbonylation measurements, chlorophyll content was analyzed, which demonstrated that the drastic drop in protein carbonyl levels occurred prior to the loss of chlorophyll that occurs during leaf senescence. (Fig. 1, B and C). Chloroplast Proteins Are Major Targets for Protein Carbonylation—Protein carbonylation does not occur at random and is targeted to specific proteins in senescing and oxidatively stressed organisms (7Dukan S. Nystrom T. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3431-3441Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar, 19Dukan S. Nystrom T. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 26027-26032Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar). To investigate whether protein oxidation is specific also in A. thaliana, we utilized a proteomic immunochemical approach to identify possible targets for protein carbonylation in aging leafs. We used the method described by O‘Farrell (18O'Farrell P.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1975; 250: 4007-4021Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) with the modifications described under “Experimental Procedures.” We analyzed the spectrum of carbonylated proteins in samples taken from plants during the day (light) period and night (dark) period. The most prominent carbonylated proteins of the aged (20 days) rosette leaves, e.g. Rubisco large subunit, Rubisco-activase, the β-subunit of ATP synthase, OEC33, and chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, are all residing in the chloroplast (Fig. 2A and Table I. Among these, all, except the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, were carbonylated both during the day and night (Table I). It is possible that the carbonylated Hsp70 chaperone identified also resides in the chloroplast, but the mass spectrometry data did not allow us to firmly distinguish between the different Hsp70s. A. thaliana has 14 members of the Hsp70 family (20Sung D.Y. Vierling E. Guy C.L. Plant Physiol. 2001; 126: 789-800Crossref PubMed Scopus (366) Google Scholar), targeted to different subcellular locations. They all share a very high degree of conservation, and therefore it was not clear which specific Hsp70 protein of the family was carbonylated. The identified carbonylated proteins of the chloroplasts are abundant plant proteins, but it is clear that many equally abundant proteins, such as the α-subunit of the ATP synthase or the small subunit of Rubisco, did not show any signs of being carbonylated. Thus, like in other model systems, carbonylation appear to be specific in the plant A. thaliana.Table IIdentities of the most carbonylated proteins of A. thaliana Protein from total cell extract was derivatized and run on two-dimensional gels. The gels were blotted to membranes, and the most carbonylated proteins were detected with antibodies. The corresponding Coomassie spots were cut out and subjected to mass spectrometry.Protein carbonylatedConditionSource, NCBI gi no.DayNightHsp70YesYesSeveral hitsRubisco-large subunitYesYes7525041β-Subunit of chloroplast ATPaseYesYes755040Rubisco-activase splice form 1YesYes7438143Rubisco-activase splice form 2YesYes7438144OEC, 33 kDaYesYes15230324Chlorophyll a/b-binding proteinNoYesSeveral hits Open table in a new tab Since Rubisco is a very abundant protein in the plant cell, it is possible that the total carbonylation signal obtained (Fig. 1B) simply follows age-dependent alterations in the abundance of Rubisco itself. However, this does not seem to be the case. Western blot analysis, using a specific antibody against Rubisco (Fig. 1C), demonstrated that Rubisco concentrations stay more or less constant during the time when carbonylation first increased gradually and subsequently dropped abruptly. In other words, the precipitous fall in protein carbonyl levels must be due to a specific reduction in the levels of oxidized proteins rather than an overall loss of Rubisco, for example, associated with the senescence syndrome. Carbonylation of Mitochondrial Proteins Is Specific—The relative abundance of some carbonylated proteins of the chloroplasts makes it difficult to detect carbonyl signals from other radical oxygen species-generating organelles, such as the mitochondria, in the crude cell extracts. Thus, to identify the most carbonylated proteins in the mitochondria, we isolated pure mitochondria from plants after 21 days of growth and applied immunochemical proteomics as described above. We found that the major targets for carbonylation in the mitochondria are glycine dehydrogenase (glycine cleavage system P-protein), a P-protein-like protein, the β-subunit of the ATP synthase, a glycine hydroxymethyltransferase-like protein, and aminomethyltransferase (glycine cleavage system T-protein) (Table II). Like in chloroplasts, some very abundant mitochondrial proteins, e.g. the mitochondrial F1 ATP synthase α-subunit, citrate synthase, and malate dehydrogenase, did not show any signs of carbonylation suggesting that carbonylation sensitivity is specific also in this organelle.Table IIIdentities of the most carbonylated proteins of the mitochondria Protein from isolated mitochondria was derivatized and run on two-dimensional gels. The gels were blotted to membranes, and the most carbonylated proteins were detected with antibodies. The corresponding Coomassie spots were cut out and subjected to mass spectrometry.Protein carbonylatedSourceNCBI gi no.Swissprot no.Glycine dehydrogenase (glycine cleavage system P-protein)O80988P-protein-like protein14596025Mitochondroial F1 ATP synthase β-subunit17939849Glycine hydroxymethyltransferase-like protein15235745Aminomethyltransferase (glycine cleavage system T-protein)O65396 Open table in a new tab Since targets for carbonylation have not been thoroughly examined in plants, many of the carbonylated proteins identified here denote new proteins on the list of oxidation-sensitive proteins. However, heat shock Hsp70 chaperones and F-type ATP synthases have been shown previously to be sensitive to oxidative attack both in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (7Dukan S. Nystrom T. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3431-3441Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar, 8Cabiscol E. Piulats E. Echave P. Herrero E. Ros J. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 27393-27398Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The identity of the other oxidized proteins of the chloroplast highlights key processes that appear to be targets for oxidative modification: specifically (i) photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and photorespiratory carbon oxidation (Rubisco, rubisco-activase), (ii) light-induced water oxidation at photosystem II (OEC33), and (iii) light harvesting and energy transfer at photochemical reaction centers (chlorophyll a/b-binding protein). Rubisco catalyzes the first step in net photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and photorespiratory carbon oxidation. The active site of Rubisco assumes a closed conformation with certain phosphorylated ligands, and in the absence of catalysis, conversion of Rubisco from the closed to the open conformation is extremely slow. Rubisco-activase facilitates this process by releasing the inhibitory sugar phosphates (reviwed in Refs. 21Portis Jr., A.R. J. Exp. Bot. 1995; 46: 1285-1291Crossref Google Scholar and 22Salvucci M.E. Ogren W.L. Photosynth. Res. 1996; 47: 1-11Crossref PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar). Rubisco-activase is an ATP-dependent AAA+ protein (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities), which includes a variety of proteins with chaperone-like functions (23Neuwald A. Aravind L. Spouge J. Koonin E. Genome Res. 1999; 9: 27-43Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Interestingly, Rubisco-activase is present in two isoforms (24Salvucci M.E. Werneke J.M. Ogren W.L. Portis Jr., A.R. Plant Physiol. 1987; 84: 930-936Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), differing only at the carboxyl terminus, which arise by alternative splicing of the gene transcript (25Werneke J.M. Chatfield J.M. Ogren W.L. Plant Cell. 1989; 1: 815-825Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar). The longer form is subjected to redox regulation via thioredoxin-f-mediated reduction of a pair of cysteine residues in the COOH-terminal extension (26Zhang N. Portis Jr., A.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 9438-9443Crossref PubMed Scopus (239) Google Scholar). Based on pI, molecular mass, abundance, and mass spectrometry data, we concluded that both forms of the activase are carbonylated, but the longer form (activase I; Fig. 2A) is significantly more oxidized. This is also supported by the oxidation index calculated by the computer program PDQuest (Fig. 2B). The OEC33 protein, together with OEC24 and OEC18, bind to the core of photosystem II at the lumenal surface to regulate the water oxidation process. Photosystem II is susceptible to damage caused by excess light, and the D1 protein of this system is a specific target for such photodamage. When damaged, D1 is rapidly degraded, and it has been suggested that OEC33 stimulates this degradation (27Yamamoto Y. Ishikawa Y. Nakatani E. Yamada M. Zhang H. Wydrzynski T. Biochemistry. 1998; 37: 1565-1574Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar). It would be interesting to elucidate whether the carbonylation of OEC33 affects D1 proteolysis and whether oxidation of OEC33 is, itself, a direct consequence of photodamage. Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding (Lhc) proteins are associated with the photosystems where they absorb energy through chlorophyll excitation and transfer the energy to photochemical reaction centers. In the case of higher plants, several reports have shown that the mRNA levels of cab transcripts fluctuate diurnally (reviewed in Ref. 28Millar A.J. Kay S.A. Plant Cell. 1991; 3: 541-550Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) with cab mRNA levels peaking in the late morning and reaching a minimum in the late evening. Interestingly, the carbonylation of this protein also fluctuated such that oxidation was mainly observed during the night (Table I). All of the proteins identified as carbonylated from the mitochondrial fraction (except for the β-subunit of the ATP synthase) play roles in the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle. Besides its carboxylse activity Rubisco has oxygenase activity, and therefore some ribulose-bisphosphate is converted to 2-phosphoglycolate, a compound that cannot be utilized by the Calvin cycle. 2-Phosphoglycolate is therefore salvaged by the C2 oxidative photosynthetic carbon cycle. In this process, two molecules of glyoxylate are joined to form glycine. Glycine moves into the mitochondrion and becomes oxidatively decarboxylated by the glycine decarboxylase complex. As shown here, several components of this complex are modified by carbonylation. This is in line with the data of Taylor et al. (29Taylor N.L. Day D.A. Millar A.H. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 42663-42668Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (151) Google Scholar) demonstrating that glycine decarboxylase activities in peas are exquisitely sensitive to oxidative stress. The “stochastic” as opposed to “programmed” view of aging states that aging results from random deleterious events, and oxidative damage has been suggested to be a major contributor to such stochastic degeneration of cells and organisms. It has been demonstrated that the levels of carbonylated proteins increase with age in a large variety of species, including mammals, nematodes, and flies, and that such oxidative modification plays havoc with the catalytic activity and structural integrity of the target proteins (2Sohal R.S. Agarwal S. Dubey A. Orr W.C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993; 90: 7255-7259Crossref PubMed Scopus (319) Google Scholar, 3Levine R.L. Garland D. Oliver C.N. Amici A. Climent I. Lenz A.G. Ahn B.W. Shaltiel S. Stadtman E.R. Methods Enzymol. 1990; 186: 464-478Crossref PubMed Scopus (4844) Google Scholar, 6Rivett A.J. Levine R.L. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990; 278: 26-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 7Dukan S. Nystrom T. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3431-3441Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar). The hypothesis is supported by experimental data demonstrating that the life span of fruitflies, for example, can be prolonged by overproducing antioxidants and that alleles that retard aging in yeast, flies, worms, and mice often boost the defense of the organism against oxidative damage (30Sun J. Tower J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999; 19: 216-228Crossref PubMed Scopus (385) Google Scholar, 31Feng J. Bussiere F. Hekimi S. Dev. Cell. 2001; 1: 633-644Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (470) Google Scholar) In plants, the concept of an individual, and therefore aging, is ambiguous. Nevertheless, the mechanisms that determine the life span of whole plants are obviously amenable to scientific examination and hypotheses aimed to explain plant longevity states that plant aging may be linked to resource allocation and competition between old and young tissues (e.g. Ref. 32Thomas H. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2002; 123: 747-753Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar). Specifically, it has been argued that older leaves are outcompeted by young tissues for “anti-aging” hormones (33Nooden L.D. Letham D.S. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1993; 20: 639-653Google Scholar), such as cytokinins (34Hwang I. Sheen J. Nature. 2001; 413: 383-389Crossref PubMed Scopus (706) Google Scholar). A variation on this theme is that young tissues seek to satisfy their demand for resources by exporting “death hormones” to older cells/tissues (35Wilson J. Physiol. Plant. 1997; 99: 511-516Crossref Google Scholar), and ethylene exhibits some characteristics of such hypothetical senescencepromoting substances (36Jing H.C. Sturre M.J. Hille J. Dijkwel P.P. Plant J. 2002; 32: 51-63Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar). These theories are, in part, analogous to some evolutionary models of senescence in animals, which propose that there is a trade-off, or antagonism, between reproduction activities and cellular maintenance and repair (37Kirkwood T.B. Nature. 1977; 270: 301-304Crossref PubMed Scopus (1312) Google Scholar, 38Williams G. Evolution. 1957; 11: 398-411Crossref Google Scholar). As an inevitable consequence, an optimal life history entails an imperfect ability of the soma to resist intrinsic stress, such as oxidative damage. With the above-mentioned theories in mind, we argued that old tissues, e.g. leaves, of an annual plant might loose their ability to defend themselves against intrinsically generated oxidative damage during transition to reproductive development. The results obtained did not support this notion. Instead, we found that old leaves rid themselves of oxidized proteins prior to bolting and flower development. At first glance, this suggests that the progression of oxidative damage in the life cycle of animals and plants is fundamentally different. Indeed, it clearly demonstrates that increased protein oxidation is not universally and inevitably related to the age of a biological tissue. However, one aspect of protein oxidation is similar in animals and plants, that is, production of offspring occurs at a time at which the overall oxidative damage in the organism is low. In animals this coincides with the early to middle stages of the life cycle of the organism, whereas in A. thaliana, it signifies the end point of its developmental progression. This begs the question of the physiological significance of the drastic drop in protein oxidation preceding flower development and to what extent this may affect the fitness of the offspring. In addition, it would be of interest to identify the temporal and molecular nature of the signals triggering the removal of damaged proteins and whether the elimination of such damage is a prerequisite for the transition to flowering. We thank Professor Elzbieta Glaser for all the help concerning isolation of mitochondria and Åsa Fredriksson for the artwork." @default.
• W1976276572 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976276572 creator A5034625560 @default.
• W1976276572 creator A5041540706 @default.
• W1976276572 creator A5056190878 @default.
• W1976276572 date "2004-05-01" @default.
• W1976276572 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1976276572 title "Progression and Specificity of Protein Oxidation in the Life Cycle of Arabidopsis thaliana" @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1567614586 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1579748532 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1606423922 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1875835053 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1968718558 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1969330683 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W1993091967 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2000304699 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2001628753 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2019376387 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2023095530 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2023692919 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2046354919 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2047170573 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2048966030 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2049314027 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2068760724 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2072117025 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2073475312 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2077610727 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2086304683 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2088148809 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2089498663 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2104314673 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2107358212 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2107919301 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2122143647 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2133560060 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W2155985618 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W4246847438 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W4253408758 @default.
• W1976276572 cites W4256423729 @default.
• W1976276572 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m402652200" @default.
• W1976276572 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15070894" @default.
• W1976276572 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W1976276572 type Work @default.
• W1976276572 sameAs 1976276572 @default.
• W1976276572 citedByCount "155" @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722012 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722013 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722014 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722015 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722016 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722017 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722018 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722019 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722020 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722021 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722022 @default.
• W1976276572 countsByYear W19762765722023 @default.
• W1976276572 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976276572 hasAuthorship W1976276572A5034625560 @default.
• W1976276572 hasAuthorship W1976276572A5041540706 @default.
• W1976276572 hasAuthorship W1976276572A5056190878 @default.
• W1976276572 hasBestOaLocation W19762765721 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C143065580 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C2775988993 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C104317684 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C143065580 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C185592680 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C2775988993 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C55493867 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C59822182 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C86803240 @default.
• W1976276572 hasConceptScore W1976276572C95444343 @default.
• W1976276572 hasIssue "21" @default.
• W1976276572 hasLocation W19762765721 @default.
• W1976276572 hasOpenAccess W1976276572 @default.
• W1976276572 hasPrimaryLocation W19762765721 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W1987278458 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W2023271816 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W2047134548 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W2051673493 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W2085710752 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W2466001904 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W2981713487 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W3034472753 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W3042563890 @default.
• W1976276572 hasRelatedWork W3215139134 @default.
• W1976276572 hasVolume "279" @default.
• W1976276572 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1976276572 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1976276572 magId "1976276572" @default.
• W1976276572 workType "article" @default.