FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976526711> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976526711 endingPage "31883" @default.
• W1976526711 startingPage "31879" @default.
• W1976526711 abstract "Mammalian cells react to heavy metal stress by transcribing a number of genes that contain metal-response elements (MREs) in their promoter/enhancer region; this activation is mediated by metal-responsive transcription factor-1 (MTF-1). Well-known target genes of MTF-1 are those encoding metallothioneins, small, cysteine-rich proteins with a high affinity for heavy metals. The response to heat shock, another cell stress, is mediated by heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1), which activates a battery of heat shock genes. Little is known about the cross-talk between the different anti-stress systems of the cell. Here we report a synergistic activation of metal-responsive promoters by heavy metal load (zinc or cadmium) and heat shock. An obvious explanation, cooperativity between MTF-1 and HSF1, seems unlikely: transfected HSF1 boosts the activity of an Hsp70 promoter but hardly affects an MRE-containing promoter upon exposure to metal and heat shock. A clue to the mechanism is given by our finding that heat shock leads to intracellular accumulation of heavy metals. We propose that the known anti-apoptotic effect of heat shock proteins allows for cell survival despite heavy metal accumulation and, consequently, results in a hyperactivation of the metal response pathway. Mammalian cells react to heavy metal stress by transcribing a number of genes that contain metal-response elements (MREs) in their promoter/enhancer region; this activation is mediated by metal-responsive transcription factor-1 (MTF-1). Well-known target genes of MTF-1 are those encoding metallothioneins, small, cysteine-rich proteins with a high affinity for heavy metals. The response to heat shock, another cell stress, is mediated by heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1), which activates a battery of heat shock genes. Little is known about the cross-talk between the different anti-stress systems of the cell. Here we report a synergistic activation of metal-responsive promoters by heavy metal load (zinc or cadmium) and heat shock. An obvious explanation, cooperativity between MTF-1 and HSF1, seems unlikely: transfected HSF1 boosts the activity of an Hsp70 promoter but hardly affects an MRE-containing promoter upon exposure to metal and heat shock. A clue to the mechanism is given by our finding that heat shock leads to intracellular accumulation of heavy metals. We propose that the known anti-apoptotic effect of heat shock proteins allows for cell survival despite heavy metal accumulation and, consequently, results in a hyperactivation of the metal response pathway. The mammalian metal-responsive transcription factor-1 (MTF-1) 1The abbreviations used are: MTF-1, metal-responsive transcription factor-1; MT, metallothionein; ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; MRE, metal-response element; HSF1, heat shock transcription factor 1; Hsp, heat shock protein; HSE, heat shock element; CMV, cytomegalovirus; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.1The abbreviations used are: MTF-1, metal-responsive transcription factor-1; MT, metallothionein; ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; MRE, metal-response element; HSF1, heat shock transcription factor 1; Hsp, heat shock protein; HSE, heat shock element; CMV, cytomegalovirus; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. is a zinc finger transcription factor that regulates the transcription of target genes in response to heavy metals (1Lichtlen P. Schaffner W. Bioessays. 2001; 23: 1010-1017Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 2Giedroc D.P. Chen X. Apuy J.L. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2001; 3: 577-596Crossref PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar, 3Andrews G.K. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000; 59: 95-104Crossref PubMed Scopus (711) Google Scholar). The best characterized target genes of MTF-1 are those encoding metallothioneins (MTs), a family of small, cysteine-rich metal-binding proteins with roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis of heavy metals, radical scavenging, and maintenance of cellular redox state (4Vasak M. Hasler D.W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000; 4: 177-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (369) Google Scholar, 5Moffatt P. Denizeau F. Drug Metab. Rev. 1997; 29: 261-307Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 6Liu X.D. Thiele D.J. Methods (Duluth). 1997; 11: 289-299Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 7Kagi J.H. Schaffer A. Biochemistry. 1988; 27: 8509-8515Crossref PubMed Scopus (1139) Google Scholar). The expression of metallothioneins can be induced by a variety of physiological and environmental stresses such as heavy metals, oxidizing agents, hypoxia, phorbol esters, ultraviolet and ionizing radiation, glucocorticoid hormones, and infectious agents. MTF-1 activates metallothionein gene expression through MRE (metal response element) sequences of core consensus TGCRCNC; multiple MREs are present in the promoter regions of MT-I and MT-II genes (1Lichtlen P. Schaffner W. Bioessays. 2001; 23: 1010-1017Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 8Radtke F. Georgiev O. Muller H.P. Brugnera E. Schaffner W. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23: 2277-2286Crossref PubMed Scopus (137) Google Scholar). In resting cells, MTF-1 resides in the cytoplasm and translocates to the nucleus in response to heavy metal exposure (9Smirnova I.V. Bittel D.C. Ravindra R. Jiang H. Andrews G.K. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 9377-9384Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (193) Google Scholar, 10Vanacore R.M. Eskew J.D. Morales P.J. Sung L. Smith A. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2000; 2: 739-752Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 11Saydam N. Georgiev O. Nakano M.Y. Greber U.F. Schaffner W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25487-25495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). Recently, we have shown that this translocation occurs not only after heavy metal stress but also after heat shock (11Saydam N. Georgiev O. Nakano M.Y. Greber U.F. Schaffner W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25487-25495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). Heat is another important stress condition that elevates, through HSF1, transcription of the genes for heat shock proteins (Hsps), which can maintain/restore cellular protein functions via chaperone activity (12Nollen E.A. Morimoto R.I. J. Cell Sci. 2002; 115: 2809-2816Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 13Jolly C. Morimoto R.I. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2000; 92: 1564-1572Crossref PubMed Scopus (867) Google Scholar, 14Morimoto R.I. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3788-3796Crossref PubMed Scopus (1526) Google Scholar, 15Parsell D.A. Lindquist S. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1993; 27: 437-496Crossref PubMed Scopus (1865) Google Scholar). The expression of heat shock proteins is also associated with pathological states, including inflammation, fever, infection, ischemia, and cancer (16Fuller K.J. Issels R.D. Slosman D.O. Guillet J.G. Soussi T. Polla B.S. Eur. J. Cancer. 1994; 30A: 1884-1891Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar, 17Wong H.R. Wispe J.R. Am. J. Physiol. 1997; 273: L1-L9Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 18Polla B.S. Bachelet M. Elia G. Santoro M.G. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998; 851: 75-85Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). Moreover, some Hsps, notably Hsp70, have been shown to protect cells against apoptosis (19Wei Y.Q. Zhao X. Kariya Y. Teshigawara K. Uchida A. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1995; 40: 73-78Crossref PubMed Scopus (177) Google Scholar, 20Mosser D.D. Caron A.W. Bourget L. Denis-Larose C. Massie B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997; 17: 5317-5327Crossref PubMed Scopus (866) Google Scholar, 21Buzzard K.A. Giaccia A.J. Killender M. Anderson R.L. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 17147-17153Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (268) Google Scholar, 22Beere H.M. Wolf B.B. Cain K. Mosser D.D. Mahboubi A. Kuwana T. Tailor P. Morimoto R.I. Cohen G.M. Green D.R. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000; 2: 469-475Crossref PubMed Scopus (1279) Google Scholar). In yeast cells, the CUP1 copper metallothionein gene is activated not only by excess copper but also by heat shock through the HSE sequences in the promoter (23Liu X.D. Thiele D.J. Genes Dev. 1996; 10: 592-603Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 24Pena M.M. Koch K.A. Thiele D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998; 18: 2514-2523Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). Conversely, in several species, cadmium induces heat shock genes as well as metallothionein genes (25Lee M.J. Nishio H. Ayaki H. Yamamoto M. Sumino K. Toxicology. 2002; 174: 109-117Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar, 26Liu J. Kadiiska M.B. Corton J.C. Qu W. Waalkes M.P. Mason R.P. Liu Y. Klaassen C.D. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002; 32: 525-535Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar, 27Tchounwou P.B. Ishaque A.B. Schneider J. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2001; 222: 21-28Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar). In mammalian cells, heat shock-induced nuclear translocation of MTF-1 has been shown to be insufficient to activate transcription from a metallothionein gene promoter (11Saydam N. Georgiev O. Nakano M.Y. Greber U.F. Schaffner W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25487-25495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). Consistent with this finding, we could not find any heat shock element (HSE) consensus sequence in the mouse metallothionein gene promoter. In this study, we report that a metallothionein promoter is hyperactivated in an MTF-1-dependent manner by a combined exposure to heat and heavy metals. This induction is associated with an accumulation of heavy metals in the cell during heat exposure. Unlike a similar hyperactivation of the heat shock 70 gene promoter by heat and cadmium where heat shock transcription factor HSF-1 plays a crucial role, HSF-1 is apparently not required for metallothionein promoter activation. Transient Transfections and Luciferase Assays—HEK293 (adenovirus-transformed human embryonic kidney) cells and HeLa (cervix carcinoma) cells were used for transient transfections. Reporter genes consisted of the firefly luciferase coding sequence driven either by a mouse metallothionein I promoter, a synthetic 4xMREd/TATA box promoter, or by the mouse Hsp70 promoter (kindly provided by Olivier Bensaude). References were β-galactosidase (CMV-LacZ) or Renilla luciferase (pRL-CMV) genes under the control of the ubiquitously active CMV promoter. Reporter and reference genes were transfected into cells by the calcium phosphate method (28Graham F.L. van der Eb A.J. Virology. 1973; 52: 456-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (6485) Google Scholar). 36 h post-transfection, cells were exposed to heat shock at 43 °C during the indicated time periods. Heavy metals, H2O2, serum, low pH (6.0), and cycloheximide were administered to the culture either during heat shock at 43 °C or at 37 °C as indicated. After heat treatments, cells were transferred to 37 °C and incubated for another 3 h to allow for the recovery of the reporter protein, luciferase (29Michels A.A. Kanon B. Bensaude O. Kampinga H.H. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 36757-36763Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar). Cells were harvested and analyzed by measuring luciferase activities according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Promega). Firefly luciferase units were normalized to either β-galactosidase values or Renilla luciferase values (30Ausubel F.M. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Publishing Associates/J. Wiley order fulfillment, Brooklyn, NY1987Google Scholar). Transcript Analysis by S1 Mapping—S1 nuclease mapping of transcripts was performed according to the standard procedure (31Weaver R.F. Weissmann C. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979; 7: 1175-1193Crossref PubMed Scopus (638) Google Scholar, 32Radtke F. Heuchel R. Georgiev O. Hergersberg M. Gariglio M. Dembic Z. Schaffner W. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 1355-1362Crossref PubMed Scopus (335) Google Scholar). OVEC-4xMREd promoter or OVEC-mMT-I promoter (10 μg/100-mm plate) and OVEC-reference driven by the CMV promoter (1 μg/100-mm plate) were transfected into 293 cells. Cells were treated with zinc, cadmium, heat, or heavy metal/heat shock combinations for the indicated times. Cells were then harvested and analyzed for the transcripts. Western Blot—HEK293 cells were transfected with a VSV-tagged MTF-1 expression vector (11Saydam N. Georgiev O. Nakano M.Y. Greber U.F. Schaffner W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25487-25495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar), and 36 h post-transfection cells were treated with either zinc (100 μm), cadmium (60 μm), and/or heat (42 °C, 1.5 h). After a 3-h recovery period of cells at 37 °C, nuclear extracts were prepared as described previously (33Schreiber E. Matthias P. Muller M.M. Schaffner W. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17: 6419Crossref PubMed Scopus (3913) Google Scholar). 30 μg of nuclear extracts was loaded onto an SDS-polyacrylamide gel (7.5%) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham Biosciences) using Transblot-SD Semi-dry Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad). Before blocking, the membrane was stained with Ponceau to verify the amount of proteins loaded into each well. Before incubation with the primary antibody, the membrane was incubated in blocking buffer (5% nonfat milk, 0.5% Tween 20 in 1× PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was then incubated with mouse anti-VSV antibody (1:10,000, Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing three times for 10 min each with washing buffer (0.5% Tween 20 in 1× PBS), the membrane was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the secondary antibody, anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-labeled (1:10,000, Vector Laboratories) in a buffer containing 2.5% nonfat milk, 0.5% Tween 20 in 1× PBS. After three washes of 15 min each, the horseradish peroxidase signal was detected using ECL Plus (Amersham Biosciences) following the manufacturer's instructions. Heavy Metal Determination in Cell Extracts—HEK293 cells were treated with 100 μm zinc or 60 μm cadmium (final concentration in DMEM culture medium containing 5% fetal calf serum), and left either at 37 °C or 42 °C for 1 h. The cells were scraped off with 5 ml of PBS ultra pure (137 mm NaCl, 2.7 mm KCl, 10 mm Na2HPO4,2mm KH2PO4). A total of 1 ml of cell suspension was diluted with 1 ml of 65% HNO3. All samples were microwave-digested (MLS Ethos 900, MLS, Leutkirch, Germany) at 210 °C and subsequently diluted with Milli Q water up to 10 ml before inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICN-MS) analysis. For analysis of metal concentrations, ICP-MS was performed using a HP4500 Series 300 ShieldTorch System instrument (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) in peak-hopping mode with a spacing at 0.05 atomic mass unit, 3 points/peak, 3 scans/sample, and an integration time of 300 ms/point. The rate of plasma flow was 15.5 liters/min with an auxiliary flow of 1.0 liter/min. The radio frequency power was 1.18 kilowatts. The samples were introduced using a cross-flow nebulizer at a flow rate of 1.02 liter/min. The apparatus was calibrated using a 6.5% HNO3 multielement solution containing Cu2+ (1.95, 3.9, 19.5, 39, 97.5, and 195 ppb), Zn2+ (2, 4, 20, 40, 100, and 200 ppb), and Cd2+ (1.82, 3.64, 18.2, 36.4, 91, and 182 ppb) with 103Rh, the internal standard for all isotopes of Cu, Zn, and Cd. The transport of MTF-1 to the nucleus is induced not only by treatment with zinc and cadmium but also by a number of other stress conditions (11Saydam N. Georgiev O. Nakano M.Y. Greber U.F. Schaffner W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25487-25495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar), which led us to test whether any of these could synergize with heavy metal induction. A luciferase reporter gene driven by a natural mouse metallothionein-I promoter or a synthetic metal-responsive promoter with four copies of the MREd sequence (“4xMREd”) was tested in HEK293 cells. Although heat shock alone did not induce reporter gene transcription, strong synergistic activation of the 4xMREd promoter was observed with zinc (34-fold versus 3-fold with metal alone) and even more pronounced with cadmium (85-fold versus 1.6-fold) in the synthetic MTF-1-dependent promoter (Fig. 1A). A less pronounced but still impressive synergy was observed at the natural metallothionein promoter with zinc (8.7× versus 1.9×) and with cadmium (9.1× versus 2.5×) (Fig. 1B). By contrast, none of the other stress conditions, including hydrogen peroxide, low extracellular pH, and cycloheximide, or a high serum concentration, acted in synergy with heavy metal treatment; in some cases metal inducibility was even reduced (Fig. 1A). The synergistic activation of the MTF-1-dependent 4xMREd promoter by heat and heavy metal load was also observed in another human cell line (HeLa) (data not shown). To test whether the strong activation observed was perhaps a peculiarity of the luciferase reporter system, we repeated the experiment in HEK293 cells with the established OVEC reporter that measures RNA levels directly (34Westin G. Gerster T. Muller M.M. Schaffner G. Schaffner W. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987; 15: 6787-6798Crossref PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar). Again there was a clear synergy of heavy metal and heat shock treatment, particularly evident with cadmium (8-fold instead of 1.8-fold with zinc, and 52-fold instead of 1.4-fold with cadmium; Fig. 2A). One possible explanation for this boost of activity might have been an increased accumulation of MTF-1 in the nucleus upon a combined heat/metal treatment. This was, however, not the case; the amount of MTF-1 that became associated with nuclear structures was the same with both metals irrespective of heat shock (Fig. 2B).Fig. 2Synthetic metal-responsive promoter (4xMREd) is activated by heat shock/heavy metal treatment at the transcriptional level. 4xMREd-OVEC and CMV-OVEC-ref constructs were transfected into 293 cells. 36 h after transfection, cells were simultaneously treated with heavy metals and heat (43 °C) as indicated in the concentrations and time course. Cells were then collected and transcripts analyzed by S1 nuclease mapping. ct, correct transcripts of reporter gene; ref, reference gene transcripts. The basal level was taken as 1 to calculate the -fold activation (A). 293 cells transfected with a VSV-tagged MTF-1 expression vector were treated with heat (42 °C, 1.5 h) and heavy metals as above. After3hof recovery at 37 °C, nuclear extracts were prepared, and Western blot was performed. VSV-tagged MTF-1 was detected by anti-VSV antibody (B).View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Next we considered the possibility that the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), the major transcription factor involved in the heat shock response, was directly or indirectly participating in this synergy effect. HSF1 is conserved from yeast to humans and binds to so-called heat shock elements (HSEs) of consensus sequence nGAAnnTTCn (35Bienz M. Pelham H.R. Cell. 1986; 45: 753-760Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar, 36Bonner J.J. Ballou C. Fackenthal D.L. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 501-508Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 37McMillan D.R. Xiao X. Shao L. Graves K. Benjamin I.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 7523-7528Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (431) Google Scholar, 38Xiao X. Zuo X. Davis A.A. McMillan D.R. Curry B.B. Richardson J.A. Benjamin I.J. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 5943-5952Crossref PubMed Scopus (447) Google Scholar). Unlike the situation in yeast, where heat shock activates metallothionein (CUP1) expression via a heat shock response element, there are no obvious binding sites for HSF-1 in the mouse metallothionein-1 promoter, let alone the synthetic 4xMREd promoter; however, an indirect effect seemed also possible, e.g. with a cofactor-like binding of HSF-1 to MTF-1, rather than to DNA. To test this possibility, we cotransfected an expression plasmid for HSF1 together with the 4xMREd promoter. The effect of HSF1 on this promoter was at most marginal (Fig. 3). By contrast, activity of an Hsp70 promoter was strongly boosted by the combination of HSF1 and heavy metal (Fig. 4). (The poor inducibility by heat without transfected HSF1 can be explained by the relatively high basal activity of the Hsp70 promoter in HEK293 cells (39Williams G.T. McClanahan T.K. Morimoto R.I. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989; 9: 2574-2587Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar).)Fig. 4Expression of the Hsp70 promoter by cadmium and heat in presence or absence of HSF1. HEK293 cells were transfected with the Hsp70-Luc promoter-reporter construct, the CMV-LacZ reference construct, and the mouse HSF1 expression vector. 36 h after transfection, cells were treated with 100 μm zinc chloride or 60 μm cadmium chloride with or without heat shock at 43 °C for 1 h. Cells were collected, and reporter gene activities were determined by luciferase assay. The basal level was taken as 1 to calculate the -fold activation.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) From this data it still seems possible that, if not HSF-1 itself, at least some heat shock proteins might be involved in the hyperactivation of the 4xMREd promoter. Chaperones are known to facilitate formation of some transcriptional regulatory complexes, which in turn activate or repress transcription from certain promoters (40Galigniana M.D. Scruggs J.L. Herrington J. Welsh M.J. Carter-Su C. Housley P.R. Pratt W.B. Mol. Endocrinol. 1998; 12: 1903-1913Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar, 41Zou J. Guo Y. Guettouche T. Smith D.F. Voellmy R. Cell. 1998; 94: 471-480Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (933) Google Scholar, 42Whitesell L. Sutphin P.D. Pulcini E.J. Martinez J.D. Cook P.H. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998; 18: 1517-1524Crossref PubMed Scopus (190) Google Scholar, 43Minet E. Mottet D. Michel G. Roland I. Raes M. Remacle J. Michiels C. FEBS Lett. 1999; 460: 251-256Crossref PubMed Scopus (278) Google Scholar, 44Heid S.E. Pollenz R.S. Swanson H.I. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000; 57: 82-92PubMed Google Scholar, 45Lewis J. Devin A. Miller A. Lin Y. Rodriguez Y. Neckers L. Liu Z.G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 10519-10526Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (294) Google Scholar). First, to test if Hsp90 is involved in the transcriptional activation of MTF-1, we treated HepG2 cells with geldanamycin, which specifically blocks the ATP binding cassette of Hsp90 and thereby abolishes its chaperone activity (46Kang K.I. Meng X. Devin-Leclerc J. Bouhouche I. Chadli A. Cadepond F. Baulieu E.E. Catelli M.G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 1439-1444Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar). In our case, however, neither the transcriptional activity nor the nuclear translocation of MTF-1 was affected by geldanamycin (data not shown). In contrast to the role of chaperones in assisting the formation of transcription complexes, recent studies by Freeman and Yamamoto indicate that some chaperones, notably p23 and Hsp90, can interfere with transcription by disassembling regulatory complexes; this was revealed by tethering chaperone-Gal4 fusion proteins to a reporter promoter (47Freeman B.C. Yamamoto K.R. Science. 2002; 296: 2232-2235Crossref PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar). Along this vein of thought, it could be argued that, upon heat shock, such interfering hsps are titrated by unfolded proteins, which would boost the transcriptional response of some promoters. To test whether the molecular chaperones p23, Hsp90, and Hsp70 mediate disassembly of the MTF-1-containing transcriptional complexes, each of these proteins was fused to the DNA binding domain of Gal4 and tested on a luciferase gene driven by three Gal4 binding sites followed by four metal response elements (MREd). However, neither Gal4-p23, Gal4-Hsp90, nor Gal4-Hsp70 significantly affected basal or heat/heavy metal-stimulated levels of transcription from this reporter gene (data not shown). Because we could not observe any involvement of the key proteins of the heat shock response in the synergistic activation of MTF-1, we considered the possibility that MTF-1 was the principal effector of transcriptional activation, whereas heat shock somehow altered the cellular handling of heavy metals. This indeed appears to be the case, because determination of zinc and cadmium concentrations in HEK293 cells shows that heat stimulates the intracellular accumulation of these metals (Fig. 5). Recent work from our laboratory pointed to a relationship between MTF-1 and heat shock stress: not only heavy metals but also heat causes the translocation of MTF-1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Other conditions tested, such as low pH (6.0), H2O2, and high serum concentration, were also found to induce, at least to some extent, this translocation. However, none of these other conditions was able per se to activate MTF-1-dependent transcription under our assay conditions (11Saydam N. Georgiev O. Nakano M.Y. Greber U.F. Schaffner W. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25487-25495Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). Here we show that heat shock is ineffective by itself, but heat and heavy metals can synergize to hyperactivate metal-inducible promoters. A straightforward explanation for this effect, cooperative action of MTF-1 and heat shock transcription factor (HSF1), was ruled out. Unlike the mouse Hsp70 promoter, which is also synergistically activated by heat and cadmium and where transfected HSF1 potentiates the effect, the presence or absence of HSF1 had no influence on the 4xMREd promoter. Because zinc is the main physiological inducer of MTF-1 in mammalian cells, one could simply postulate that heat shock triggers a zinc release from cellular zinc stores, which in turn binds to MTF-1 allowing it to activate its target genes. However, zinc liberated by heat shock alone would be expected to activate MTF-1, which is not the case: transcription is only induced when exogenous zinc or cadmium is provided during heat shock. Interestingly, relatively low concentrations of these heavy metals, which by themselves hardly induce transcription, are sufficient for synergistic activation. We find that the amount of MTF-1 associated with nuclear structures is not increased by heat/metal treatment versus metal alone (Fig. 2B). Alterations in the phosphorylation state of MTF-1 have been invoked in the process of transcriptional induction (48LaRochelle O. Gagne V. Charron J. Soh J.W. Seguin C. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 41879-41888Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar, 49Saydam N. Adams T.K. Steiner F. Schaffner W. Freedman J.H. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 20438-20445Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar). It is unknown at present whether heat treatment results in additional modifications of MTF-1 and/or of a putative cofactor that remains to be identified. Taken together, the hyperactivation of the metallothionein promoter by heat and metal is best explained by the propensity of cells to accumulate heavy metal under heat shock. Indeed we find that at a given heavy metal concentration in the culture medium, heat shock resulted in 2.5- and 2.3-fold higher intracellular concentrations of zinc and cadmium, respectively. However, our attempts to achieve the same high level of activation by merely increasing extracellular heavy metal concentration at 37 °C were unsuccessful, invariably resulting in massive cell death (not shown). This finding of course raises the question why the cells did not die in the combination of metal and heat shock. It is well-documented that heat shock proteins, notably Hsp70, exert a strong anti-apoptotic effect (13Jolly C. Morimoto R.I. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2000; 92: 1564-1572Crossref PubMed Scopus (867) Google Scholar). Therefore, we propose that heat treatment not only results in heavy metal accumulation but also allows for survival at intracellular metal concentrations that could not be tolerated otherwise. Although cadmium is not a physiological trace element, zinc is essential for proper functioning of the immune system (50Rink L. Kirchner H. J. Nutr. 2000; 130: 1407S-1411SCrossref PubMed Google Scholar), and it is tempting to speculate that fever, a natural heat shock condition (51Hasday J.D. Singh I.S. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2000; 5: 471-480Crossref PubMed Scopus (118) Google Scholar), contributes to the defense against infectious agents by promoting zinc uptake, among other effects. Furthermore, upon infection stress, an increased production of MT (52Grider A. Kao K.J. Klein P.A. Cousins R.J. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1989; 113: 221-228PubMed Google Scholar, 53Schroeder J.J. Cousins R.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990; 87: 3137-3141Crossref PubMed Scopus (294) Google Scholar, 54Coyle P. Philcox J.C. Rofe A.M. Inflamm. Res. 1995; 44: 475-481Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar, 55Bruwer M. Schmid K.W. Metz K.A. Krieglstein C.F. Senninger N. Schurmann G. Inflamm. Res. 2001; 50: 289-293Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 56Zangger K. Oz G. Haslinger E. Kunert O. Armitage I.M. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 1303-1305Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar, 57Ghoshal K. Majumder S. Zhu Q. Hunzeker J. Datta J. Shah M. Sheridan J.F. Jacob S.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; 21: 8301-8317Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar) might also protect cells against the reactive oxygen species produced by the innate immune system. We are indebted to Dr. Gerd Multhaup and Andreas Simons (Heidelberg) for metal determinations. We also thank Drs. Olivier Bensaude (Paris) for the Hsp70 promoter construct, Didier Picard (Geneva) for Hsp90 expression vector and anti-Hsp90 antibody, Vincenzo Zimarino (Milano) for HSF1 expression vector, Ivor J. Benjamin (Dallas) for HSF1 knockout cells, Brian C. Freeman and Keith R. Yamamoto (San Francisco) for the Gal4-p23, Gal4-Hsp90, and Gal4-Hsp70 expression vectors, Fritz Ochsenbein for preparing the figures, and Jason Kinchen for critical reading of the manuscript." @default.
• W1976526711 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976526711 creator A5018514323 @default.
• W1976526711 creator A5030605671 @default.
• W1976526711 creator A5047979903 @default.
• W1976526711 creator A5068134709 @default.
• W1976526711 date "2003-08-01" @default.
• W1976526711 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1976526711 title "Heat and Heavy Metal Stress Synergize to Mediate Transcriptional Hyperactivation by Metal-responsive Transcription Factor MTF-1" @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1901873593 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1942944342 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1965372133 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1965849506 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1967138582 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1967969993 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1969638997 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1973341497 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1977302081 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1984782455 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W1993168796 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2003471511 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2004731363 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2005334574 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2013150301 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2013640714 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2013751209 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2016730049 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2020103418 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2026093245 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2029301296 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2031793125 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2032458072 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2040566578 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2040808575 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2050443213 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2051432193 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2054990195 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2059524588 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2060971785 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2083890417 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2088732231 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2094736151 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2098237651 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2098407672 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2099302625 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2107358262 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2107789276 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2111858669 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2114259920 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2114920291 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2118296350 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2125847914 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2129091231 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2133253267 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2135468968 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2137819605 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2140561339 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2148573587 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2158290831 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W2313932305 @default.
• W1976526711 cites W4248215221 @default.
• W1976526711 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m302138200" @default.
• W1976526711 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12805380" @default.
• W1976526711 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W1976526711 type Work @default.
• W1976526711 sameAs 1976526711 @default.
• W1976526711 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112012 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112013 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112014 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112015 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112016 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112017 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112018 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112019 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112021 @default.
• W1976526711 countsByYear W19765267112022 @default.
• W1976526711 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976526711 hasAuthorship W1976526711A5018514323 @default.
• W1976526711 hasAuthorship W1976526711A5030605671 @default.
• W1976526711 hasAuthorship W1976526711A5047979903 @default.
• W1976526711 hasAuthorship W1976526711A5068134709 @default.
• W1976526711 hasBestOaLocation W19765267111 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C179926584 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C2778366672 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C2987418964 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C544153396 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C86339819 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W1976526711 hasConceptScore W1976526711C104317684 @default.

• next