FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976885527> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976885527 endingPage "968" @default.
• W1976885527 startingPage "960" @default.
• W1976885527 abstract "Background Controlled trials support pancreatic-stent placement as an effective intervention for the prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Objective To perform a decision analysis to evaluate the most cost-effective strategy for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Design Cost-effectiveness analysis. Setting Patients undergoing ERCP. Interventions Three competing strategies were evaluated in a decision analysis model from a third-party–payer perspective in hypothetical patients undergoing ERCP. In strategy I, none of the patients had pancreatic-stent placement. Strategy II had only those patients identified to be at high risk for post-ERCP, and, in strategy III, all patients underwent prophylactic stent placement. Probabilities of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis and the risk reduction by placement of a pancreatic stent were obtained from published information. Cost estimates were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates. Main Outcome Measurements Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of different strategies. Results Strategy I was the least-expensive strategy but yielded the least number of life years. Strategy II yielded the highest number of years of life, with an ICER of $11,766 per year of life saved, and strategy III was dominated by strategy II. Limitations Indirect costs and pharmacologic prophylaxis were not considered in this analysis. Conclusions Pancreatic-stent placement for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients is a cost-effective strategy. Controlled trials support pancreatic-stent placement as an effective intervention for the prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in high-risk patients. To perform a decision analysis to evaluate the most cost-effective strategy for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients undergoing ERCP. Three competing strategies were evaluated in a decision analysis model from a third-party–payer perspective in hypothetical patients undergoing ERCP. In strategy I, none of the patients had pancreatic-stent placement. Strategy II had only those patients identified to be at high risk for post-ERCP, and, in strategy III, all patients underwent prophylactic stent placement. Probabilities of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis and the risk reduction by placement of a pancreatic stent were obtained from published information. Cost estimates were obtained from Medicare reimbursement rates. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of different strategies. Strategy I was the least-expensive strategy but yielded the least number of life years. Strategy II yielded the highest number of years of life, with an ICER of $11,766 per year of life saved, and strategy III was dominated by strategy II. Indirect costs and pharmacologic prophylaxis were not considered in this analysis. Pancreatic-stent placement for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients is a cost-effective strategy." @default.
• W1976885527 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976885527 creator A5025611396 @default.
• W1976885527 creator A5025700605 @default.
• W1976885527 creator A5055521032 @default.
• W1976885527 creator A5077042611 @default.
• W1976885527 date "2007-06-01" @default.
• W1976885527 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1976885527 title "Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis" @default.
• W1976885527 cites W1580691413 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W1966337454 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W1980187445 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W1987897255 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W1989222506 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W1994719819 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2011034929 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2017449390 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2017641574 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2023236421 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2024974112 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2029845357 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2030020455 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2042937625 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2043772350 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2043813971 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2043951092 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2045932891 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2052808930 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2055011751 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2064252525 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2070612576 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2071449669 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2089545523 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2092103192 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2095008137 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2116827291 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2118435622 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W2168046530 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W3122426397 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W3164468 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W4250051503 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W4250343134 @default.
• W1976885527 cites W82338767 @default.
• W1976885527 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.031" @default.
• W1976885527 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17331513" @default.
• W1976885527 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1976885527 type Work @default.
• W1976885527 sameAs 1976885527 @default.
• W1976885527 citedByCount "110" @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272012 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272013 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272014 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272015 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272016 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272017 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272018 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272019 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272020 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272021 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272022 @default.
• W1976885527 countsByYear W19768855272023 @default.
• W1976885527 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976885527 hasAuthorship W1976885527A5025611396 @default.
• W1976885527 hasAuthorship W1976885527A5025700605 @default.
• W1976885527 hasAuthorship W1976885527A5055521032 @default.
• W1976885527 hasAuthorship W1976885527A5077042611 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C2779703844 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C2779900020 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C515549039 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C112930515 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C141071460 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C160735492 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C162324750 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C168563851 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C177713679 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C2775967933 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C2778583881 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C2779703844 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C2779900020 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C3019080777 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C50522688 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C515549039 @default.
• W1976885527 hasConceptScore W1976885527C71924100 @default.
• W1976885527 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W1976885527 hasLocation W19768855271 @default.
• W1976885527 hasLocation W19768855272 @default.
• W1976885527 hasOpenAccess W1976885527 @default.

• next