FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976899139> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976899139 endingPage "e19" @default.
• W1976899139 startingPage "e13" @default.
• W1976899139 abstract "Prescription of preoperatory imaging assessment prior to planned breast reconstruction surgery (reduction or augmentation mastoplasty, correction of congenital breast asymmetry) is poorly codified. The objective of this study was to analyze the attitudes of French radiologists and plastic surgeons with regard to prescription of preoperative imaging in the framework of non-oncologic breast surgery.This is a descriptive and comparative observational study involving two groups, one consisting of 50 plastic surgeons (P) and the other of 50 radiologists (R) specialized in breast imaging. A questionnaire was handed out to radiologists during a conference on breast imaging at the Institut Gustave-Roussy in Paris (France) held on 17th December 2012. The same questionnaire was handed out to plastic surgeons at the National Congress of the French Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (SOFCPRE) held on 19th, 20th and 21st November 2012, also in Paris (France). The questionnaire focused on prescription of preoperative and postoperative imaging evaluation for non-oncologic breast surgery in patients with no risk factors for breast cancer or clinically identified indications.Forty-six percent of the plastic surgeons considered an imaging exam to be recent when it had been carried out over the previous 6 months, while 40% of the radiologists set the figure at 1 year. Clinical breast density exerted no influence on 92% of the plastic surgeons and 98% of the radiologists. A majority of the plastic surgeons would prescribe a preoperative exam regardless of age (57% for breast reduction, 61% for breast implant placement and 61% for surgical correction of asymmetry) while the radiologists would prescribe exams mainly for patients over 40 years (50% for reduction, 44% for augmentation, 49% for asymmetry correction). The plastic surgeons would prescribe either ultrasound or mammograms (59% for reduction, 72% for augmentation, 66% for asymmetry correction) while radiologists would usually prescribe mammograms (64%, 57%, 64%). Most of the radiologists, along with the plastic surgeons, did not think that postoperative examination is justified (58% of P and 62% of R for reduction, 56% P and 68% of R for augmentation, 52% of P and 64% of R for asymmetry correction).In 2012, there existed no French consensus on prescription of a preoperative imaging assessment in the framework of non-oncologic breast surgery in patients without risk factors for breast cancer. Active cooperation bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons is likely to facilitate the harmonizing of their respective practices. In this paper, we propose guidelines that could help them to synchronize their efforts." @default.
• W1976899139 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5008587420 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5018056378 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5050333038 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5073954959 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5074807127 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5075116875 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5007035646 @default.
• W1976899139 creator A5039386578 @default.
• W1976899139 date "2014-04-01" @default.
• W1976899139 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1976899139 title "Preoperative imaging prior to breast reconstruction surgery: Benchmarking bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons. Proposed guidelines" @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1965601465 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1978096344 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1986704559 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1990693217 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1991064064 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1995361183 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2001483333 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2018854350 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2023761490 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2026812973 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2062967403 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2066105489 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2074221321 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2079678506 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2090556048 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2093274693 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2106285030 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2112437229 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2116082792 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2141656804 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W2147289521 @default.
• W1976899139 cites W1993602943 @default.
• W1976899139 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2013.07.010" @default.
• W1976899139 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24556529" @default.
• W1976899139 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1976899139 type Work @default.
• W1976899139 sameAs 1976899139 @default.
• W1976899139 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1976899139 countsByYear W19768991392015 @default.
• W1976899139 countsByYear W19768991392016 @default.
• W1976899139 countsByYear W19768991392021 @default.
• W1976899139 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5007035646 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5008587420 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5018056378 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5039386578 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5050333038 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5073954959 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5074807127 @default.
• W1976899139 hasAuthorship W1976899139A5075116875 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C116558999 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C137762411 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C2777704003 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C2778579461 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C2781001896 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C116558999 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C121608353 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C126322002 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C137762411 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C141071460 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C142724271 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C23131810 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C2426938 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C2777432617 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C2777704003 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C2778579461 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C2780472235 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C2781001896 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C530470458 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C61434518 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C71924100 @default.
• W1976899139 hasConceptScore W1976899139C98274493 @default.
• W1976899139 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1976899139 hasLocation W19768991391 @default.
• W1976899139 hasLocation W19768991392 @default.
• W1976899139 hasOpenAccess W1976899139 @default.
• W1976899139 hasPrimaryLocation W19768991391 @default.
• W1976899139 hasRelatedWork W1538607013 @default.
• W1976899139 hasRelatedWork W1976899139 @default.
• W1976899139 hasRelatedWork W2049593331 @default.
• W1976899139 hasRelatedWork W2067692762 @default.
• W1976899139 hasRelatedWork W2129523083 @default.
• W1976899139 hasRelatedWork W2885380201 @default.

• next