FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1976985194> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1976985194 endingPage "790" @default.
• W1976985194 startingPage "786" @default.
• W1976985194 abstract "The purpose of this study was to compare an objective to a subjective method of tooth shade evaluation using the SP78 sphere spectrophotometer and human visual analysis. Twenty extracted fully developed human maxillary teeth had their L* values (lightness) read by the SP78 on day 1 and then again on day 14. Using a blind method, five human evaluators then attempted to match shade tabs from a six-tab experimental Vita shade guide to the same teeth on days 1 and 14. The SP78 L* values read for each tooth were evaluated for a match between those obtained on day 1 and those read on day 14. The results of human evaluation of tooth shade were compared among the evaluators and then between themselves over time. Finally, the ability of human evaluators to match tooth shade was compared with the results obtained with the SP78. The SP78 reproduced L* readings within the standard error of the machine (≤1.0) in 16 of 20 (80%) teeth. In contrast, interevaluator agreement expressed as majority agreement (3, 4, or 5 of 5 evaluators agreeing) was only 10 of 20 (50%) teeth on day 1 and 13 of 20 (65%) teeth on day 14. Intraevaluator agreement over the experimental period ranged from 20 to 60%. The results of this study confirm that human evaluation of tooth shade is unreliable and that the SP78 sphere spectrophotometer can provide a more predictable and accurate method of evaluating tooth shade in vitro. This finding opens up a new avenue of investigation for testing the effectiveness of materials and techniques in bleaching discolored teeth. The purpose of this study was to compare an objective to a subjective method of tooth shade evaluation using the SP78 sphere spectrophotometer and human visual analysis. Twenty extracted fully developed human maxillary teeth had their L* values (lightness) read by the SP78 on day 1 and then again on day 14. Using a blind method, five human evaluators then attempted to match shade tabs from a six-tab experimental Vita shade guide to the same teeth on days 1 and 14. The SP78 L* values read for each tooth were evaluated for a match between those obtained on day 1 and those read on day 14. The results of human evaluation of tooth shade were compared among the evaluators and then between themselves over time. Finally, the ability of human evaluators to match tooth shade was compared with the results obtained with the SP78. The SP78 reproduced L* readings within the standard error of the machine (≤1.0) in 16 of 20 (80%) teeth. In contrast, interevaluator agreement expressed as majority agreement (3, 4, or 5 of 5 evaluators agreeing) was only 10 of 20 (50%) teeth on day 1 and 13 of 20 (65%) teeth on day 14. Intraevaluator agreement over the experimental period ranged from 20 to 60%. The results of this study confirm that human evaluation of tooth shade is unreliable and that the SP78 sphere spectrophotometer can provide a more predictable and accurate method of evaluating tooth shade in vitro. This finding opens up a new avenue of investigation for testing the effectiveness of materials and techniques in bleaching discolored teeth." @default.
• W1976985194 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1976985194 creator A5039676993 @default.
• W1976985194 creator A5056530169 @default.
• W1976985194 creator A5065577159 @default.
• W1976985194 date "1998-12-01" @default.
• W1976985194 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W1976985194 title "Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade" @default.
• W1976985194 cites W185635285 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W1975616279 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W1979322538 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W1982425472 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W2031386229 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W2060476637 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W2060921046 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W2119408094 @default.
• W1976985194 cites W2431442068 @default.
• W1976985194 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(98)80002-2" @default.
• W1976985194 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10023254" @default.
• W1976985194 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W1976985194 type Work @default.
• W1976985194 sameAs 1976985194 @default.
• W1976985194 citedByCount "105" @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942012 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942013 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942014 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942015 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942016 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942017 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942018 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942019 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942020 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942021 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942022 @default.
• W1976985194 countsByYear W19769851942023 @default.
• W1976985194 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1976985194 hasAuthorship W1976985194A5039676993 @default.
• W1976985194 hasAuthorship W1976985194A5056530169 @default.
• W1976985194 hasAuthorship W1976985194A5065577159 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C193601281 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C2781112085 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C154945302 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C156887251 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C193601281 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C199343813 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C2776502983 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C2781112085 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C29694066 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C33923547 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C41008148 @default.
• W1976985194 hasConceptScore W1976985194C71924100 @default.
• W1976985194 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W1976985194 hasLocation W19769851941 @default.
• W1976985194 hasLocation W19769851942 @default.
• W1976985194 hasOpenAccess W1976985194 @default.
• W1976985194 hasPrimaryLocation W19769851941 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2033737334 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2062705468 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2069600530 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2393266462 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2395939126 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2580696615 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2800731157 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W2932278651 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W3165280650 @default.
• W1976985194 hasRelatedWork W4293221315 @default.
• W1976985194 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W1976985194 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1976985194 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1976985194 magId "1976985194" @default.
• W1976985194 workType "article" @default.