FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1977707890> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1977707890 abstract "This paper investigates any significant differences in levels of language ability in employing the test-taking strategies. It is an exploration for the application of proper strategies for the intended item types and the effects on the test scores. A list of test-taking strategies which was involved Reading and Test-management strategies (suggested by Cohen and Upton, 2006) in a test of reading comprehension of TOEFL iBT was employed. A total of 22 items, two computerized reading comprehension passages, were administered to undergraduate students (26 males and 40 females) majoring in English language and literature in a computer site at University of Tehran, IR Iran. The participants were asked to do the tests in no longer than 45 minutes and then specify the strategies that they employed in doing each reading comprehension item. Before administering the test, participants became generally familiar with the test procedures and test taking strategies in a pre-test session. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyze the collected data. The results showed that there is no significant difference among test-takers with respect to different language abilities. However, the comparison of the amount of usage among participants with various language proficiencies showed that the Low and Medium group were out-performed in comparison with the High group. The results revealed that language learners tend to make use of different test-taking strategies in test of reading comprehension- whether the correct strategies for the correct item types or vice versa- in any levels of language abilities. Furthermore, it is concluded that the use of strategies- either appropriate or inappropriate- espoused directly on the learner's scores. And if the use of strategies are not directed it may cause unsuccessful result in the exams. Subsequently, some purposeful teaching of related strategies is suggested." @default.
• W1977707890 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1977707890 creator A5073481299 @default.
• W1977707890 creator A5075043791 @default.
• W1977707890 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W1977707890 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1977707890 title "Are They Right Participants for the Right Strategies? A Case Study in the Role of Levels of Language Ability in Strategy Use in Reading Section of TOEFL iBT" @default.
• W1977707890 cites W1535495756 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W1904390819 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W1976429022 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W1976829137 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2007247383 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2016663226 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2020807755 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2032071689 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2037639020 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2044605728 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2052391847 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2054708649 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2072404599 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2074241103 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2103885788 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2106017801 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2128236486 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2164982547 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2166284420 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2169330552 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2253649454 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W2494666991 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W279178856 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W3009409874 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W391592474 @default.
• W1977707890 cites W612103563 @default.
• W1977707890 doi "https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.5.877-886" @default.
• W1977707890 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1977707890 type Work @default.
• W1977707890 sameAs 1977707890 @default.
• W1977707890 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1977707890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1977707890 hasAuthorship W1977707890A5073481299 @default.
• W1977707890 hasAuthorship W1977707890A5075043791 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C18563106 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C2780129039 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C2987496018 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C111919701 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C138885662 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C145420912 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C15744967 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C18563106 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C2780129039 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C2987496018 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C41008148 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C41895202 @default.
• W1977707890 hasConceptScore W1977707890C554936623 @default.
• W1977707890 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1977707890 hasLocation W19777078901 @default.
• W1977707890 hasOpenAccess W1977707890 @default.
• W1977707890 hasPrimaryLocation W19777078901 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W1151199228 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W1968776184 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W1971288970 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W2056081136 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W2057096963 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W2256758429 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W2912538575 @default.
• W1977707890 hasRelatedWork W3002841150 @default.
• W1977707890 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W1977707890 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1977707890 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1977707890 magId "1977707890" @default.
• W1977707890 workType "article" @default.